Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing  (Read 3199 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Quo Vadis Petre

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1234
  • Reputation: +1208/-6
  • Gender: Male
Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
« on: May 16, 2012, 10:35:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing

    By Cindy Wooden
    Catholic News Service



    Bishop Bernard Fellay, superior of the Society of St. Pius X, delivers a blessing during an early morning Mass at the society's headquarters in Menzingen, Switzerland. (CNS/Paul Haring)

    VATICAN CITY (CNS) -- Reconciliation talks between the Vatican and the Society of St. Pius X have not reached their conclusion but will continue, the Vatican said May 16, after members of its doctrinal congregation examined the latest communication from the head of the breakaway traditionalist group.

    "Some observations were formulated which will be kept in mind in further discussions," said Jesuit Father Federico Lombardi, Vatican spokesman, following a meeting of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

    Those observations regarded the SSPX's official response to a "doctrinal preamble," prepared by the Vatican in September, outlining "some doctrinal principles and criteria for the interpretation of Catholic doctrine necessary to guarantee fidelity" to the formal teaching of the church, including the teaching of the Second Vatican Council.

    The response was submitted in April by Bishop Bernard Fellay, the society's superior general. While Bishop Fellay has been generally positive about the possibility of reconciliation with Rome, leaked letters show that the society's three other bishops have had serious reservations about the process.

    "In consideration of the positions taken by the three other bishops of the Society of St. Pius, their situation will have to be treated separately and individually," Father Lombardi said in a statement.

    In addition to the hesitancy of the three bishops to support fully Bishop Fellay's efforts, Father Lombardi said, Bishop Richard Williamson's public denials of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and anti-Semitic statements also would require discussions separate from those of reconciliation with the SSPX as a whole.

    "It is not that this is a process that necessarily will reach a solution that embraces all the positions" found among all the SSPX members, Father Lombardi said.

    Even if the SSPX as a whole is reconciled with Rome, he said, "the individual bishops each must make a commitment" to full communion with Rome. "It's not as if there will be one solution that automatically extends to all."

    Many observers of the process had expected the May 16 doctrinal congregation meeting to mark the penultimate step in the reconciliation talks. It appeared that congregation members would review Bishop Fellay's response and forward their opinions about it to Pope Benedict XVI for his final action.

    Father Lombardi, however, said officials at the doctrinal congregation informed the pope of the results of the day's meeting but did not believe the reconciliation process was nearing its end.

    "Obviously, the decision is in the pope's hands" and he can act when and how he wants, "but despite how it may have seemed -- that we were talking about a brief amount of time -- it is a process that continues," Father Lombardi said.

    "It would be premature to guess when the process will end," he added.

    Pope Benedict's latest efforts to bring about reconciliation with the traditionalist group began when he lifted the excommunications imposed on Bishop Fellay and other SSPX bishops after they were ordained without papal permission. The pope also established a Vatican committee for doctrinal talks with society representatives in 2009, and drafted the "doctrinal preamble" to explain the "minimal, essential" elements on which the society would have to agree for full reconciliation, Father Lombardi had said.
    "In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics." -St. Pius X

    "If the Church were not divine, this


    Offline Quo Vadis Petre

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1234
    • Reputation: +1208/-6
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #1 on: May 16, 2012, 10:39:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Notice how they always go back to the "sacrosanct dogma" of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and "anti-Semitism." Poor Bishop Williamson, being subjected to this outrage after just winning his case in Germany, forcing his opponents to pay him for the charges!
    "In our time more than ever before, the greatest asset of the evil-disposed is the cowardice and weakness of good men, and all the vigour of Satan's reign is due to the easy-going weakness of Catholics." -St. Pius X

    "If the Church were not divine, this


    Offline Diego

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1277
    • Reputation: +4/-1
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #2 on: May 16, 2012, 10:48:54 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre
    Notice how they always go back to the "sacrosanct dogma" of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and "anti-Semitism." Poor Bishop Williamson, being subjected to this outrage after just winning his case in Germany, forcing his opponents to pay him for the charges!


    Let there be no doubt then that the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan is firmly in control of the Vatican.

    As for Krah and the rest of his inner circle... " But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?" Luke 18:8.

    Or will the SSPX be just one more gaggle of h0Ɩ0h0αxers?

    Offline justso

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 24
    • Reputation: +125/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #3 on: May 16, 2012, 11:53:26 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    "In consideration of the positions taken by the three other bishops of the Society of St. Pius, their situation will have to be treated separately and individually," Father Lombardi said in a statement.

    In addition to the hesitancy of the three bishops to support fully Bishop Fellay's efforts, Father Lombardi said, Bishop Richard Williamson's public denials of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and anti-Semitic statements also would require discussions separate from those of reconciliation with the SSPX as a whole.


    And here we see again a dogma of the one world religion: thou shalt not question the h0Ɩ0cαųst.

    I suppose since this has been raised to an article of the faith, which is the bar of determination for who is "in" the Church, we should expect a revised Credo soon from the USCCCP?

    Cardinal Foxman must be pleased.





    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3722/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #4 on: May 16, 2012, 12:30:53 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    In addition to the hesitancy of the three bishops to support fully Bishop Fellay's efforts, Father Lombardi said, Bishop Richard Williamson's public denials of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and anti-Semitic statements also would require discussions separate from those of reconciliation with the SSPX as a whole.



    Folks, just who do think is behind the curtain pulling the strings?


    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3722/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #5 on: May 16, 2012, 12:34:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Diego
    Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre
    Notice how they always go back to the "sacrosanct dogma" of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and "anti-Semitism." Poor Bishop Williamson, being subjected to this outrage after just winning his case in Germany, forcing his opponents to pay him for the charges!


    Let there be no doubt then that the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan is firmly in control of the Vatican.

    As for Krah and the rest of his inner circle... " But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?" Luke 18:8.

    Or will the SSPX be just one more gaggle of h0Ɩ0h0αxers?


    Yes and here before us we see the plan of how to divide and destroy the SSPX from within.  This looks like the end if it takes place.

    Offline PereJoseph

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1411
    • Reputation: +1978/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #6 on: May 16, 2012, 02:05:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: J.Paul
    Quote from: Diego
    Quote from: Quo Vadis Petre
    Notice how they always go back to the "sacrosanct dogma" of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and "anti-Semitism." Poor Bishop Williamson, being subjected to this outrage after just winning his case in Germany, forcing his opponents to pay him for the charges!


    Let there be no doubt then that the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan is firmly in control of the Vatican.

    As for Krah and the rest of his inner circle... " But yet the Son of man, when he cometh, shall he find, think you, faith on earth?" Luke 18:8.

    Or will the SSPX be just one more gaggle of h0Ɩ0h0αxers?


    Yes and here before us we see the plan of how to divide and destroy the SSPX from within.  This looks like the end if it takes place.


    This is actually great for us, ultimately :  Like in the ancient days of the Apostles, our battle against the devil and his agents will be clear and robust.  No more will false ambiguity and smokescreens will be able to obscure the still clear battle line between the Kingship of the Sacred Heart of Our Lord Jesus Christ and the Enemy, with his ѕуηαgσgυє, who "maketh themselves adversaries to all men" unto the rule of Mammon in this world.  We have the great honour and privilege, therefore, of clean association with our devout ancestors in the Faith, of fighting and perhaps dying like true Soldiers of Christ for the glory of the Holy Name of God against all manner of wickedness in this, the blackest of all ages yet.  :incense:

    Offline TKGS

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5767
    • Reputation: +4620/-480
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #7 on: May 16, 2012, 02:08:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: justso
    Quote
    "In consideration of the positions taken by the three other bishops of the Society of St. Pius, their situation will have to be treated separately and individually," Father Lombardi said in a statement.

    In addition to the hesitancy of the three bishops to support fully Bishop Fellay's efforts, Father Lombardi said, Bishop Richard Williamson's public denials of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and anti-Semitic statements also would require discussions separate from those of reconciliation with the SSPX as a whole.


    And here we see again a dogma of the one world religion: thou shalt not question the h0Ɩ0cαųst.

    I suppose since this has been raised to an article of the faith, which is the bar of determination for who is "in" the Church, we should expect a revised Credo soon from the USCCCP?

    Cardinal Foxman must be pleased.


    You haven't been to a Novus Ordo service in a while.  I'm sure that if you listen to their recitation of the Creed at the Novus Ordo you'll distinctly hear:

    "I believe in the h0Ɩ0cαųst, the holy catholic church..."   :wink:


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15064
    • Reputation: +9980/-3161
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #8 on: May 16, 2012, 04:15:39 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Rome is smart.

    The longer they wait to brng these discussions to a conclusion, the more division will be sown within the SSPX.

    Unless Bishop Fellay call off the discussions, we can expect further fragmentation in the SSPX.
    Rom 5: 20 - "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3722/-293
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #9 on: May 17, 2012, 08:13:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    "In consideration of the positions taken by the three other bishops of the Society of St. Pius, their situation will have to be treated separately and individually," Father Lombardi said in a statement.






    " behold Satan hath desired to have you, that he may sift you as wheat"

    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3821
    • Reputation: +2664/-26
    • Gender: Female
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #10 on: May 17, 2012, 11:03:49 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: justso
    Quote
    "In consideration of the positions taken by the three other bishops of the Society of St. Pius, their situation will have to be treated separately and individually," Father Lombardi said in a statement.

    In addition to the hesitancy of the three bishops to support fully Bishop Fellay's efforts, Father Lombardi said, Bishop Richard Williamson's public denials of the h0Ɩ0cαųst and anti-Semitic statements also would require discussions separate from those of reconciliation with the SSPX as a whole.


    And here we see again a dogma of the one world religion: thou shalt not question the h0Ɩ0cαųst.

    I suppose since this has been raised to an article of the faith, which is the bar of determination for who is "in" the Church, we should expect a revised Credo soon from the USCCCP?

    Cardinal Foxman must be pleased.






    The "h0Ɩ0cαųst" is the replacement for the true sacrifice of the Cross. Nothing, not even if all 6 billion people in the world were sacrificed by the antichrist, could quench the thirst for the justice of sin in the world, except for the Precious Blood of Jesus, and His Adorable Body.

    The Jєωs are trying to make the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" a "new crucifixion."

    We read in the Chiesa Viva where the Freemasonic plan is laid out, how the Sign of the Cross will be outlawed. Will the replacement be some "sign of the h0Ɩ0cαųst" instead? The infamous "mark of the beast?"

    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/A-Chiesa-Viva-worth-reading


    "Antipope conferred the greatest power to choose their successors. Order to all, under pain of excommunication, and as soon as possible, referral to "secular arm" to take the "mark of the Beast. " But, of course, do not call it that. The sign of Cross should not be done either on persons, or through them. It should not be blessed anymore. Making the sign of the cross must be considered (a) heinous act of idolatry and disobedience."
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,


    Offline justso

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 24
    • Reputation: +125/-0
    • Gender: Male
    Vatican says Reconciliation Talks with SSPX still Ongoing
    « Reply #11 on: May 17, 2012, 11:18:16 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: parentsfortruth
    The Jєωs are trying to make the "h0Ɩ0cαųst" a "new crucifixion."


    Indeed.

    Here are some excerpts from "The Jєωιѕн Faction" by Joseph Sobran.
    Link to Original

    It's a tremendous read.


    ...The organized Jєωιѕн faction is what I call the Tribe. It’s a bit more specific than “the Jєωs”; but it includes most Jєωs, who, as many opinion polls show, overwhelmingly support the state of Israel and, furthermore, overwhelmingly favor “progressive” causes like legal abortion, “sɛҳuąƖ freedom,” and “gαy rights.”

    ...Within the Tribe, one of the worst sins a Jєω can commit is to become a Christian, as witness Jєωιѕн hostility to Jєωs for Jesus. An irreligious or atheist Jєω may claim Israeli citizenship at any time, but a Jєω who has converted to Christianity may not. This antagonism is so predominant that the Tribe opposes not only government endorsements of Christianity, but even the public exaltation of the Old Testament (as in displays of the Ten Commandments on public property) because Christians have adopted it too. The “Judaeo-Christian tradition” is a sentimental myth, treasured by many Christians but by very few Jєωs.

    ...As Rabbi Jacob Neusner has observed, for most Jєωs today Auschwitz has replaced Sinai as the definitive moment in the Jєωιѕн past. And Auschwitz is projected all the way back to Calvary.

    ...May I utter here, in the privacy of my own newsletter, the dark and reactionary suspicion that the perpetually plaintive Tribe was actually content to live in Christian lands? Even today, more Jєωs choose to live in Christian America than in the state of Israel, typically attacking Christians for supposed bigotries they harbor instead of thanking Christians for their long record of tolerance and benevolence.

    Again, the Tribe seems, by its own account, to have a long and puzzling tradition of migrating to anti-Semitic countries. Or rather, “anti-Semitism” is the explanation it gives for its own perpetual unpopularity, and at the root of anti-Semitism, it insists, is Christianity (though a new explanation has to be found for its unpopularity in the Muslim world).

    Enough already. It’s time to face the possibility that Jєωιѕн problems are sometimes due to Jєωιѕн attitudes and Jєωιѕн behavior. My father once remarked to me that the Jєωs are disliked everywhere they go because of “their crooked ways.” Though, as I later learned, Dad had been an altar boy, he said nothing about Christ-killing; he’d long since left the Church and he didn’t particularly care who had killed Christ. As a matter of fact, he didn’t particularly dislike Jєωs; but he did think it was their ethics, not their biblical record, that had earned them their low reputation.

    ...At any rate, Christians knew from the start how the Tribe felt about them, and nothing has changed since then except that today’s Christians have become remarkably naive about it. Christ tells us to forgive our enemies, but he doesn’t ask us to pretend that they are our friends. He predicted persecution as the natural price of discipleship; hence we are to be “wise as serpents, but harmless as doves.” Christians have often failed on both counts, but the guidelines are clear enough.