Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: SigismundThe SSPX does not routinely re-ordain priests ordained in the NO, do they?Under whose judgment should they "routinely re-ordain priests" anyway? If they were concerned with Christians' baptisms being invalid, would they "routinely re-baptize" Christians? Are you aware that both Baptism and Holy Orders are sacraments that cannot be repeated without grave sacrilege? Are you recommending that taking the chance of commission of grave sacrilege is a reasonable risk?
The SSPX does not routinely re-ordain priests ordained in the NO, do they?
Quote from: Neil ObstatQuote from: SigismundThe SSPX does not routinely re-ordain priests ordained in the NO, do they?Under whose judgment should they "routinely re-ordain priests" anyway? If they were concerned with Christians' baptisms being invalid, would they "routinely re-baptize" Christians? Are you aware that both Baptism and Holy Orders are sacraments that cannot be repeated without grave sacrilege? Are you recommending that taking the chance of commission of grave sacrilege is a reasonable risk? Absolutely not. I think NO ordinations and sacraments are valid, and I agree that repeating the unrepeatable ones would be objectively a sacrilege. I was simply asking if the SSPX thought so too.