Validity isn’t everything. A black Mass if officiated by a valid priest is valid. It doesn't mean Catholics should partake!

Valid clergy were saying the Latin Mass right up to, during and right after Vatican II, therefore the Latin Mass is not going to "fix everything" as some seem to think.

It just hit me. It's so obvious, so clear, but no one ever mentions this.

I've often talked about how finding a validly ordained priest is important, but it's not the only thing.

Well, here's the drop-dead killer argument: how many souls lost the Faith after decades of Vatican II and its Conciliar Church? How many lost belief in important dogmas, gave up countless Catholic practices, and became de-facto protestant in their thinking, beliefs, morals, and habits? What men pushed this agenda upon the Catholic laity?

VALID PRIESTS.

How many priests were valid, at the close of Vatican II? ALL OF THEM.
Who pushed the New Mass and the New Conciliar Religion upon the majority of Catholics? Valid priests!

Even if the New Rite of Ordination were 100% invalid, it would take SOME TIME for those invalid priests to work their way into the Conciliar parishes and join their VALIDLY ORDAINED BRETHREN in the wide-scale destruction of Catholicism.

Moral of the story: validity IS NOT EVERYTHING.  You could go to a valid priest, attend a valid Mass, and yet absorb so much modernism, bad example, bad teaching, and bad milieu that you end up losing the Faith and all Catholic sense. BEWARE.

Absolutely.
Michael Davies made the point that it was not the out-and-out modernists who were predominantly responsible for the collapse of the Church after Vatican II -the faithful would never have followed them- but the good parish priests who had the confidence of their flock, who advised them to 'stay with the Holy Father' and follow the gradual changes.
We need to know ourselves and we need to know our priests, and we need to know the fight that we are in. More than ever, Catholics need to read and educate themselves about the Faith and the Revolution.
We also need to be careful of the other extreme of becoming 'home aloners' just because no group or priest shares all our opinions on every detail of the crisis. That is a trap that has also shipwrecked many souls.

Well, all those priests who went along with VII, didn't have internet back then plus the vague language of the modernists has taken decades to sift through. 
Most priests probably hadn't even heard of Archbishop Lefebrve.
It even took an expert in canon law like Fr Hesse years to come around. 
It's similar in some respects to the Moon landing and other hoaxes like the Shoahbusiness. 
Because man has naturally been endowed with an obedience to hierarchy/authority whatever it decrees
as reality is assumed to be fact. Most men lack the natural curiosity, discernment or have a thirst for truth to
question what is spoonfed to them.  
The average person sincerely trusts that the government is essentially a benevolent thing looking out
for its best interests, even though nearly 100% of the time it's operating against their interests and well being.
Sometimes I will see older gentlemen wearing a hat indicating they are a proud Veteran of some war another
the empire waged for the banksters. If you were to question one of these men about the origins of the war they
fought in they would likely only be able to provide very superficial and nonsensical answers, defaulting to 
platitudes about "defending your freedom"
I often wonder how nearly half the population can look at someone as loathsome like Kamala hαɾɾιs and not
have a visceral reaction of disgust. Instead they see someone funny, sincere, and competent. 
It's nice to believe priests or policemen or soldiers are different from the rest of us, have a higher standard of
ethics or more courage...NOPE. 
Broad is the path of destruction for everyone, regardless of their vocation.