Author Topic: USA Hispanics from the SSPX (Read 28380 times)

Telesphorus · « **Reply #120 on:** January 22, 2012, 12:21:26 PM »

Quote from: nadieimportante

The color of their skin means nothing. If you are 100% white Norwegian homeless drunkard, and I'm a blue black man from Nigeria worth millions, who is superior?

Who would you rather be the father of your grandchildren?

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #121 on:** January 22, 2012, 12:27:49 PM »

Where would you rather be homeless? In Norway or Rhodesia [Present day in its messed up form]?

Lighthouse · « **Reply #122 on:** January 22, 2012, 01:37:59 PM »

Nadi:

Quote

To a Catholic, the number one would be who is living a life according to God's will. Who saves their soul in the end, is all that makes one superior, for you can't take any of the above things that make one superior in this world. what good does allthat "American white" do all those "superior" people in America? They are practically all going to hell.

That's pretty much the bottom line and you all should leave it at that.

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #123 on:** January 22, 2012, 02:37:48 PM »

Quote from: Lighthouse

Nadi:

Quote
To a Catholic, the number one would be who is living a life according to God's will. Who saves their soul in the end, is all that makes one superior, for you can't take any of the above things that make one superior in this world. what good does allthat "American white" do all those "superior" people in America? They are practically all going to hell.

That's pretty much the bottom line and you all should leave it at that.

It's not unreasonable to want to live in a place where you and your family are at home and reasonably secure.

nadieimportante · « **Reply #124 on:** January 22, 2012, 05:19:38 PM »

Quote from: Raoul76

nadieimportante said:
Quote
The world that I live in judges a man's superiority by their achievements (the order has no significance):

How much money they make, have.
How many toys they own, like house, cars, yacht etc. (not mortgaged or financed))

Quote
The color of their skin means nothing. If you are 100% white Norwegian homeless drunkard, and I'm a blue black man from Nigeria worth millions, who is superior?

He who loves the world hates me, ring any bells?

If a fiction writer came on this site trying to play the part of a Latin macho to irritate Tele, he couldn't have it done it any better, lol.

Strawman. Did you miss these two parts or did you just leave it out so you could slander me? Please explain.

The world that I live in judges a man's superiority by their achievements (the order has no significance): [/b][/u]
How much money they make, have.
How many toys they own, like house, cars, yacht etc. (not mortgaged or financed))

To a Catholic , the number one would be who is living a life according to God's will. Who saves their soul in the end, is all that makes one superior, for you can't take any of the above things that make one superior in this world.

Augstine Baker · « **Reply #125 on:** January 22, 2012, 05:51:08 PM »

There are other measures of success too, which include crime statistics, recidivism, disease, tendency for violent crime and other factors which can dramatically affect the kind of experience you have in an area, unless you're successful enough where you can live in a gated community and hire armed guards.

nadieimportante · « **Reply #126 on:** January 22, 2012, 06:58:35 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: nadieimportante
The color of their skin means nothing. If you are 100% white Norwegian homeless drunkard, and I'm a blue black man from Nigeria worth millions, who is superior?

Who would you rather be the father of your grandchildren?

This is one of those questions that if you had another chance I'm sure you would have deleted, right?

Raoul76 · « **Reply #127 on:** January 22, 2012, 07:02:15 PM »

nadieimportante said:

Quote

The world that I live in judges a man's superiority by their achievements (the order has no significance):
How much money they make, have.
How many toys they own, like house, cars, yacht etc. (not mortgaged or financed))

To a Catholic , the number one would be who is living a life according to God's will. Who saves their soul in the end, is all that makes one superior, for you can't take any of the above things that make one superior in this world.

I missed the second part, I apologize. But as I'm sure you'll understand, I had no way of knowing that you were negative towards "the world that you live in." It sounded like you were boasting about it.

nadieimportante · « **Reply #128 on:** January 22, 2012, 08:09:02 PM »

Quote from: Raoul76

nadieimportante said:
Quote
The world that I live in judges a man's superiority by their achievements (the order has no significance):
How much money they make, have.
How many toys they own, like house, cars, yacht etc. (not mortgaged or financed))

To a Catholic , the number one would be who is living a life according to God's will. Who saves their soul in the end, is all that makes one superior, for you can't take any of the above things that make one superior in this world.

I missed the second part, I apologize. But as I'm sure you'll understand, I had no way of knowing that you were negative towards "the world that you live in." It sounded like you were boasting about it.

No problem, thanks.

(By the way, calling a Latino a macho is not an insult. I think the idea that it's an insult comes from the emasculation of men by feminists in the USA and Europe.)

Quote

play the part of a Latin macho

Telesphorus · « **Reply #129 on:** January 22, 2012, 09:14:41 PM »

Quote from: nadieimportante

This is one of those questions that if you had another chance I'm sure you would have deleted, right?

Of course not.

Which would you prefer?

Do you think that woman Heidi Klum would have been better off married to a drunken homeless Norwegian?

Probably yes.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #130 on:** January 22, 2012, 09:25:39 PM »

And the same goes for the Elin Nordegren.

Augustinian · « **Reply #131 on:** January 22, 2012, 09:27:05 PM »

And Nicole Brown Simpson.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #132 on:** January 22, 2012, 09:36:00 PM »

I'll point out something else:

A good woman, by giving herself to a certain type of man, can make a huge difference in his life. But of course today, when women pairing off (and even then without permanent commitment) happens so late you are not likely to find the sort of woman who can help a man make something of himself (what was that proverb about a woman being behind a successful man? that sounds like meaningless cliche these days, but it must have meant something once). Just as you don't often see good men marrying young women and helping them to become mothers instead of what they are becoming these days.

Sigismund · « **Reply #133 on:** January 22, 2012, 09:37:01 PM »

Quote from: Telesphorus

Quote from: nadieimportante
The color of their skin means nothing. If you are 100% white Norwegian homeless drunkard, and I'm a blue black man from Nigeria worth millions, who is superior?

Who would you rather be the father of your grandchildren?

What a breathtakingly offensive comment. I want the fathers of my grandchildren to be Catholic. Thanks be to God, all of them are. I could not care less about their race. I certainly would not want you to be their father. But since my wife was not white, and my daughters are racially impure and over 22, I suppose you wouldn't want that either.

Telesphorus · « **Reply #134 on:** January 22, 2012, 09:40:05 PM »

Quote from: Sigismund

What a breathtakingly offensive comment.

Because black millionaires are supposedly good fathers and homeless Norwegian males who drink are inveterately bad and evil people? And because it's wrong to want one's grandchildren to look like oneself?

That's offensive? What is offensive is idea that the worth of fatherhood and heritable characteristics can be measured by money.