No silly, we are talking about the type of Matter and Form you claim Christ instituted for the other five sacraments. May I have them and your source of reference.
The "sacred Tradition," meaning what is "handed down" from the Apostles to their successors, is the "reference," Boru. Sacred Tradition is considered to be "Divine Revelation" by the Roman Catholic Church.
You seem to mistakenly think that the Church just winged it and decided on olive oil because it was common in the Mediterranean region. But that is wrong. And the Church never has thought like that about the "substance of the Sacraments," as the quotes from Trent, et al. show.
Just as natural water (not salt water) is used exclusively to perform the cleansing in the Baptismal Rite, so the oil of the olive tree is used exclusively in anointing because it ties into both the Davidic kingship motif as well as the violent crushing that takes place to obtain the "glory of the olive," its oil. This juxtaposition of symbols represents Jesus, the King who is murdered by his own apostate people.
Olive oil, not palm oil or some other oil that had been in use by humans in the region of the Holy Land was chosen by Our Lord himself according to the factual, undeniable, exclusive usage by the Apostles to perform the Rite. Our "reference" is to simply look at that what the Church has always done.
Your position is if Sacred Scripture does not contain "proof" that it came from Jesus himself, then the tradition is a mere "tradition of men." This is a "sola scriptura," Protestantized mentality. Ironically, the godfather of "sola scriptura" is none other than Martin Luther, a man you accuse Sedes of following.