Author Topic: ELEISON COMMENTS Number CDXLI (441) Dec 26,2015 A.D. (Read 2381 times)

Meg · « **Reply #15 on:** December 27, 2015, 04:21:33 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Bishop Williamson is suggesting that the Vicar of Christ can also be the head of a false religion. What *is* he thinking?

Well, he's not thinking like a sedevacantist, so for that he'll receive no end of criticism here.

The Dominicans of Avrille have written about the same topic here, but in a different way, though I think that few here will be interested in reading it:

http://www.dominicansavrille.us/is-there-a-conciliar-church/

2Vermont · « **Reply #16 on:** December 27, 2015, 04:28:52 PM »

Quote from: Meg

Quote from: 2Vermont

Bishop Williamson is suggesting that the Vicar of Christ can also be the head of a false religion. What *is* he thinking?

Well, he's not thinking like a sedevacantist, so for that he'll receive no end of criticism here.

The Dominicans of Avrille have written about the same topic here, but in a different way, though I think that few here will be interested in reading it:

http://www.dominicansavrille.us/is-there-a-conciliar-church/

Actually, he isn't thinking if he can even suggest that the Vicar of Christ is also the head of a false religion...unless he really doesn't believe that the Novus Ordo religion is false.

McCork · « **Reply #17 on:** December 27, 2015, 04:35:18 PM »

Quote from: 2Vermont

Quote from: Meg
Quote from: 2Vermont

Bishop Williamson is suggesting that the Vicar of Christ can also be the head of a false religion. What *is* he thinking?

Well, he's not thinking like a sedevacantist, so for that he'll receive no end of criticism here.

The Dominicans of Avrille have written about the same topic here, but in a different way, though I think that few here will be interested in reading it:

http://www.dominicansavrille.us/is-there-a-conciliar-church/

Actually, he isn't thinking if he can even suggest that the Vicar of Christ is also the head of a false religion...unless he really doesn't believe that the Novus Ordo religion is false.

Saying "the pope is the head of a false religion" is PRECISELY equivalent to saying he is a "manifest heretic". You only have to look at the books since 1870 to see what it means when a pope becomes a manifest heretic. Intriguing, y'all?

Meg · « **Reply #18 on:** December 27, 2015, 04:37:02 PM »

Quote from: McCork

Quote from: 2Vermont
Quote from: Meg
Quote from: 2Vermont

Bishop Williamson is suggesting that the Vicar of Christ can also be the head of a false religion. What *is* he thinking?

Well, he's not thinking like a sedevacantist, so for that he'll receive no end of criticism here.

The Dominicans of Avrille have written about the same topic here, but in a different way, though I think that few here will be interested in reading it:

http://www.dominicansavrille.us/is-there-a-conciliar-church/

Actually, he isn't thinking if he can even suggest that the Vicar of Christ is also the head of a false religion...unless he really doesn't believe that the Novus Ordo religion is false.

Saying "the pope is the head of a false religion" is PRECISELY equivalent to saying he is a "manifest heretic". You only have to look at the books since 1870 to see what it means when a pope becomes a manifest heretic. Intriguing, y'all?

Did you read what he wrote in its entirety, and try to understand it? Did you read the Avrille article? Or are you just reacting without really trying to understand?

Miseremini · « **Reply #19 on:** December 27, 2015, 05:33:00 PM »

Bishop Williamson wrote paragraphs one, five and six.
A recent convert to tradition wrote paragraphs two, three and four which it appears many are attributing the His Excellency.
I think paragraph 5 & 6 explain it well if read and understood.

In paragraph 5 there is a very important word "But"