Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Which priests are being transferred?  (Read 19953 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Sienna629

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 345
  • Reputation: +363/-5
  • Gender: Female
Which priests are being transferred?
« Reply #45 on: June 24, 2013, 04:24:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
    Why the constant musical chairs? We have had 4 priests in 3 years.


    Not us. Same one for 8 years now.


    They must feel he is keeping the lid on pretty good, and not embarrassing them by observing aloud that "the Emperor has no clothes".

    Offline Raphaela

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 267
    • Reputation: +361/-23
    • Gender: Female
    Which priests are being transferred?
    « Reply #46 on: June 24, 2013, 05:10:36 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Does anyone know who the replacements for Fr. Kimball and Fr. Clifton in England are?


    Offline Neil Obstat

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 18177
    • Reputation: +8277/-692
    • Gender: Male
    Which priests are being transferred?
    « Reply #47 on: June 24, 2013, 05:51:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Sienna629
    Quote from: MaterDominici
    Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant
    Why the constant musical chairs? We have had 4 priests in 3 years.


    Not us. Same one for 8 years now.


    They must feel he is keeping the lid on pretty good, and not embarrassing them by observing aloud that "the Emperor has no clothes".



    This seems to be one of the closely guarded secrets even
    of the diocese bishops - they move parish priests around like
    game pieces on a playing board and they do not give any
    reason for the moves.  When someone asks, even if it's the
    priest himself, they say, pretty much, "none of your beeswax."



    Yours is not to question why.

    Yours is but to do or die.





    They have their reasons, and they're not telling.  Why not?
    Well, they're not telling that either.  

    So we are left to our reason and common sense.  If telling
    their reasons could be made to appear as though it supports
    their agenda and does not make trouble for their demands of
    blind obedience (they're not honest enough to use that term),
    then they would tell their reasons.  But they do not tell their
    reasons, therefore, we are left to surmise that the opposite
    must be the case.  

    Telling their reasons must be problematic because there
    would be no way of doing so convincingly, and other
    questions would arise inevitably, such that their all-important
    agenda would be at risk.

    Once we have that principle in mind, we can presume to
    follow the logic trail from there.  Invariably, it is the identity
    of their all-important agenda that is at stake.  And it would be
    their agenda itself that they are trying to keep from being
    exposed for what it is.  In the case of the Menzingen-
    denizens, it is their push toward an updating to Vat.II and
    the New Code and false ecuмenism and a one-world church
    that is what they do not want to admit is the truth.  

    But whatever you do, do not believe Internet rumours.  

    Oh, but they'll never define what they mean by that.  They
    leave it up to you to think you're smart by imagining what
    they mean, and that way, the same ambiguous message
    can mean different things to different people, and
    everyone's own subjective reality can be their own fantasy,
    even while the leadership continues its specific course of
    action only without having to bother with accountability.

    Hey, it's worked for the Obamanation for 5 years, why not
    the Menzingen-denizens?  



    .--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.