This fraudulent good pope/bad pope story needs to die.
You're falsely attributing this notion to +Vigano out of your unbridled and insatiable contempt for him, and you're incapable of reading nuances. If +Vigano didn't spend 4 paragraphs frothing at the mouth about the heresies of Ratzinger, you interpret that to mean that he considered Ratzinger a "good pope". He's repeatedly criticized him and does so here as well, albeit gently, IMO TOO gently. But to suggest that he characterized him as a "good pope" is more of your slander campaing against +Vigano. You should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself, and you need to stop posting. But nothing is going to stop you. You need to pray that God is more gentle with you at your judgment than you are with +Vigano, in whom you apparently see nothing but evil.