From the mailbag:
On 02/28/2016 10:19 AM, ______ wrote:
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
> I was reading your Cathinfo forum and was curious about the one on Pablo because he almost sounds as if he were possessed. Out of curiosity I googled his name to see if anything came up. You may have seen this lengthy article on Paul Hernandez dated 2001 but I thought I would forward it to you anyway. (This has to be the same Hernandez as it mentions Fr. Pfeiffer’s name). This has to explain ‘Pablo’s’ and Fr. Pfeiffer’s really weird relationship . After reading this article below I can only conclude that indeed he, Pablo, (and for that matter maybe even Fr. Pfeiffer)may very well be possessed. Lay people should positively never ever be messing around with the demonic as he seems to have done for a very long time.
>
> Very sad situation in Boston, KY.
>
> God Bless,
>
>
>
>
http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/the-devil-and-mr-hernandez-6418725>
> "Hernandez says he's never discussed exorcism directly with Our Lady of Sorrows' current pastor, Joseph Pfeiffer, but believes Pfeiffer supports his work. In a New Times interview, however, Pfeiffer says he's never performed an exorcism himself, and demonstrates a skeptical attitude about the practice."
Yes, as a matter of fact when this article came to light a couple years ago it made me decide to ban Pablo for the good of the Resistance. There was no emotional falling out or anything like that.
I decided that A) Pablo's
sensus Catholicus was in hopeless shape (dabbling in the demonic, superstition, etc.), and B) Pablo was a liability to the Resistance. I had to take away his "platform" for fame, at least insofar as it lay within my power. I had to do what I could to remove him from the spotlight.
He also was known for bombastic exaggeration and fomenting confusion, for example when one of the Pfeiffer buildings burnt down, he said, "The only thing left is the mailbox." and many people thought the whole ranch (including the main house Mr. & Mrs. Pfeiffer live in) burnt down. He causes confusion, and is way too sensational and emotional to be put in charge of the successor to the SSPX -- the Resistance -- which is the best hope of people keeping the Faith during this Crisis.
You might find it interesting to note that Pablo totally "owned" this story. He had no problems with it, when confronted with it. Which is quite telling, since this story really shows what Pablo is made of: insanity. I mean, waiting up for the devil with a boom box and a deck of playing cards? For a third party, not for yourself -- and yourself being a LAYMAN?
As I've often said, there's a REASON Catholics say that dabbling in the devil is bad news.
If it was just "scary to hear about" or "unpleasant" but had no practical consequences, how could you say Catholics must avoid it? No, it's to be avoided because one could become obsessed or possessed. And it's scary that Pablo was this involved with the devil 13 years ago. Where would that unhealthy fascination take him? Well, just look at the man today. He wears black, his other favorite color is red (color of fire, warning), he talks foul, divides, threatens violence, has corrupted Fr. Pfeiffer (convincing him to fight other priests/bishops) and through Fr. Pfeiffer has caused countless souls to stop attending Mass on a regular basis, he himself doesn't attend Mass anymore (for years), he slanders the best Resistance priests, foments hatred and enmity, etc.
And let's not forget: He constantly uses the devil's tactics, also used by the devil's minions the Communists and Freemasons. Namely: character assassination, propaganda, lies, slander, projection of one's faults onto one's enemies (the boldest lying and slander).
I would be willing to believe the devil is involved, yes.
Matthew