If you know or think you know of any non catholic beliefs that the st.pius is guilty of please just in easy to read point form (No long articles please) list them for housewives who are short on time but big on the truth.
Have you not read any of the threads here on the topic? They are abundant.
It depends on just how important this is to you, whether or not you give time to reading up (books are better for busy housewives, IMO).
Yes, important topics demand some time to understand. Just as the excuse, "I don't have time to read/understand/learn about it" would not be justified after things went haywire after Vatican II, busy or not busy, if it's important one has to take the time to look into it.
But if you want a soundbyte answer, I suppose we could start with the fact that
- Bishop Fellay accepted the hermeneutic of continuity,
- said that Vatican II enlightens certain doctrines of the Faith not yet formulated,
- that the New Mass was legitimately promulgated,
- and accepted that the religious liberty of Vatican II
"is reconcilable" with Catholic Tradition.
(see the doctrinal preamble)
He has not retracted any of this. Along with that, more and more SSPX priests saying that you have to accept the parts of the poisonous soup of Vatican II that aren't poison.