Perhaps I can leverage my complaint into some
constructive critism.
Excuuuse me!  Thanks for creating or perpetuating so much [expletives deleted] confusion!  [At least for] those readers among us who [....] have never been SSPX insiders, and thus not privy to whom in [expletives deleted] these names identify, and why we should give a [expletives deleted]?
I'm guessing that practically all the regular C.I. readers among us realize that it's
extremely important to
traditionl Catholicism that the work of FSSPX as founded & developed by Abp. Lefebvre be faithfully continued, even if circuмstances regrettably require abandoning the
institutional  FSSPX of Bp. Fellay.
He posted this on his website- [/color] yesterday, March 4th.
"
He" being the "
Tony La Rosa" whose name on that Web site is indeed linked to the site's own page <
/author/ecclesia-militans/>.
Upon further review, I suppose I should give "SeanGovan" some credit for a quick reply to himself that appears to be a belated attempt to compensate for an
original posting that consisted entirely of an
unsourced apparently-
complete-copy of someone
else's words that had been posted
elsewhere (i.e., outside C.I.).
That
original posting was especially
confusing when considering:
· 
first-person singular pronouns in important sentences;
· posting under an apparent personal name "SeanGovan" that was
not the "Tony La Rosa" obviously meant by at least some of the
first-person singular pronouns;
· 
absence of any clearly presented
quoting; and
· 3-to-4-line gaps inserted between paragraphs, which an Internet-forum newbie might have somehow assumed would adequately delimit changes in authorship back-&-forth between "La Rosa" and "Govan"--whoever they are.
C.I.'s highly worthwhile
quoting feature (i.e., "[quote] .... [/quote]") just ain't that hard to use properly [×], e.g.:
Concerning Fr. Joseph Pfeiffer and Fr. David Hewko
4 March 2017
I want to preface what I am about to state that I, Tony La Rosa, speak only for myself.
[....]
Finally, to Fr. Pfeiffer and Fr. Hewko, I am sorry for the grief I have caused you. I hope you will forgive me.  I will make reparation by promoting your work on the Ecclesia Militans website.
Something like the clearly delimited
quoting immediately above, plus some brief text above or below the quote identifying its source, e.g., "Tony La Rosa via ecclesiamilitans"
- [/color], would've avoided creating frustrating confusion among some C.I. readers. Especially those among us who are trying to keep up with doings in the FSSPX Resistance, but without making nearly a life's work of memorizing all the actors, their nom(s?) de plume, their Web addresses, and their personal & ecclesiastical histories, e.g.: "Tony La Rosa" and "Ecclesia Militans"
- .
The very next post was from today, announcing Father Pfeiffer's next Mass in Ontario.
Aha!  In the
Canadian province named
Ontario (its most populous,
eh?).
It was not at all obvious to me whether "Govan" offered his
original posting as defiant admiration, or as a target for criticism & ridicule. So I couldn't rule out its possible explanation as an odd exercise in
sock-puppetry.
-------
Note
@: The most obvious naïve
domain name, except for it being a "
.com". I suppose that'll have to suffice for C.I. readers, because I fear that C.I. is configured to block|delete the exact Web address if I type it. Owner-moderator Matthew posted 4 replies among the first 7 postings in the topic, so if he wanted to provide the offending site's Web address (e.g., so other readers could judge for themselves the original and verify the accuracy & completeness of its quoting by SeanGovan), he certainly had enough opportunities to do so.
Note ×: Explaining how to use the C.I.
quoting feature, which is simplified by a pale-gray simulated "[ Quote ]" button that works on mouse-or-
pointer-selected text,
even on the "
Creating Topic" page, is waaay outside the scope of this reply.
Note #: A name that I continue to confuse with that of a guy who's geographically
much closer, and was banned from C.I. last year. But that's best left for its own topic at some other time.