Author Topic: Tissier de Mallerais Interview (Read 9504 times)

LordPhan · « **Reply #20 on:** June 15, 2012, 02:23:56 AM »

http://www.cfnews.org/page10/page37/page37.html

CFN now has the Interview up.

Ethelred · « **Reply #21 on:** June 15, 2012, 02:39:54 AM »

Quote from: Antony

Quote from: AntiFellayism
They need to find a way to KICK Bishop Judas Fellay out !

Be careful of that one. You and I may not agree with him. But to call him a Judas is very wrong.

That's true.

When I recently had the chance to go to confession to an experienced SSPX priest in Austria who's wonderfully loyal to the Faith and hence to Archbishop Lefebvre, the good father advised me not to call Bishop Fellay a "Judas", but just a "follower of Judas".

Because that's much more precise.

JPaul · « **Reply #22 on:** June 15, 2012, 04:00:10 PM »

Quote from: Ethelred

Quote from: Antony
Quote from: AntiFellayism
They need to find a way to KICK Bishop Judas Fellay out !

Be careful of that one. You and I may not agree with him. But to call him a Judas is very wrong.

That's true.

When I recently had the chance to go to confession to an experienced SSPX priest in Austria who's wonderfully loyal to the Faith and hence to Archbishop Lefebvre, the good father advised me not to call Bishop Fellay a "Judas", but just a "follower of Judas".

Because that's much more precise.

He seems to be a profoundly confused and misled man at this point.

SeanJohnson · « **Reply #23 on:** June 17, 2012, 01:55:27 PM »

"But Pope Benedict XVI, while he is the pope, remains a modernist. His speech Program of December 22, 2005 is a profession of the evolution of the truths of the faith according to the dominant ideas of each era. Despite his favorable gestures, his real intention in integrating us into the conciliar orb can only be to lead us back to Vatican II. He told it himself to Bishop Fellay in August 2005 and in a confidential memo by himself, illicitly published, has recently confirmed that."

Comment:

1) Certainly the most damning statement to come out against Bishop Fellay since the peace process stepped up the pace in 2009;

2) How can Bishop Fellay and his minions look us in the face and tell us everything will be OK if we sign a practical deal, when according to TDM, the pope has announced his intentions frankly to Bishop Fellay to the contrary?!?

3) And more then this, if Bishop Fellay already knows the SSPX will be destroyed through reintegration into Conciliarism, why does he push forward?

4) Is there any other explanation other than a desire to destroy the SSPX, when one knowingly leads it into the hands of an enemy who has made his intention known and clear?

5) All of the sudden, the "infiltrator" theory does not seem so far fetched; words I would not have spoken before reading TDM's words in this interview.

JPaul · « **Reply #24 on:** June 17, 2012, 04:39:58 PM »

Quote from: Seraphim

"But Pope Benedict XVI, while he is the pope, remains a modernist. His speech Program of December 22, 2005 is a profession of the evolution of the truths of the faith according to the dominant ideas of each era. Despite his favorable gestures, his real intention in integrating us into the conciliar orb can only be to lead us back to Vatican II. He told it himself to Bishop Fellay in August 2005 and in a confidential memo by himself, illicitly published, has recently confirmed that."

Comment:

1) Certainly the most damning statement to come out against Bishop Fellay since the peace process stepped up the pace in 2009;

2) How can Bishop Fellay and his minions look us in the face and tell us everything will be OK if we sign a practical deal, when according to TDM, the pope has announced his intentions frankly to Bishop Fellay to the contrary?!?

3) And more then this, if Bishop Fellay already knows the SSPX will be destroyed through reintegration into Conciliarism, why does he push forward?

4) Is there any other explanation other than a desire to destroy the SSPX, when one knowingly leads it into the hands of an enemy who has made his intention known and clear?

5) All of the sudden, the "infiltrator" theory does not seem so far fetched; words I would not have spoken before reading TDM's words in this interview.

Infiltration is indeed a reality. Krah is one agent. An old maxim of a sucessful negotiation when one wants to get another to do something is to lead them to believe that you are offering something to them that they want.

It seems to fit this series of events. It may be that Bishop Fellay is convinced that he is going to get something good from this process. In the end I would think that they will hand him his head on a "dossier".