I recently warned the blinded SSPX that they would not be exempted from the recent Roman decrees incorporating new “saints” and Novus Ordo prefaces into the 1962 Missal (effectively making it a 2020 Missal) in two articles available here:

http://tradcatresist.blogspot.com/2020/03/two-excellent-articles-by-sean-johnson.html?m=1

Some tried to argue that the new decrees were only optional.

Yet I rebutted that argument by noting the Roman modus operandi has remained the same since Vatican II:

Stress the optional nature to dissipate resistance, then later make the measures mandatory.

Now Rorate Coeli is reporting that Rome is sending a survey to all the bishops of the world, asking pointed questions about how Summorum Pontificuм has been implemented in their respective dioceses:

https://rorate-caeli.blogspot.com/2020/04/breaking-important-summorum-under.html#more

With the PCED dissolved into the CDF (ie., the Commission being largely obsolete, with the SSPX already largely regularized), and the new hybrid missal just promulgated (optional for now, but not for long), it isn’t difficult to see where this is going:

Rome is laying the groundwork for abrogating SP, which, once the new 2020 hybrid Missal becomes mandatory, will be completely obsolete:

The 1962 Missal having disappeared, the raison d’etre for the motu proprio serves no purpose.

And just like that, the SSPX will have lost the 1962 Missal (which like their former PCED brothers, was pretty much the only thing they had been allowed to retain).

Some people never learn.

Introducing new "saints", especially if they were morally and spiritually dreck like JPII, is a way to ensure that people leave the SSPX permanently.

Introducing new "saints", especially if they were morally and spiritually dreck like JPII, is a way to ensure that people leave the SSPX permanently.

What about people like Padre Pio?

And what makes you think the SSPX would use this “hybrid Missal”? 

Unfounded speculation is key to just about  everything you say

And what makes you think the SSPX would use this “hybrid Missal”?

Unfounded speculation is key to just about  everything you say

Hardly unfounded speculation. I still hold out some hope that the SSPX will turn away from the direction they are heading. As for the “hybrid Missal”, you do know that the mass that most SSPX priests celebrate is a hybrid?

With Francis and his likes in charge, this is expected.

And the mere suggestion they would have doubtfully ordained conciliar priests perform marriages for their faithful in SSPX or Novus Ordo churches is equally preposterous!!

They are in total capitulation mode!

If Rome has announced nobody can refuse to say the NOM Mass and still be in Union with Rome, the SSPX will go quite a bit further than the hybrid Missal (a la Campos concelebrating the NOM).  They just need to be patient so useful idiots like you can pretend there have been no changes!

You are a blatant lying troll, and I can’t believe you are tolerated here:

Divine Mercy pics st the altar is “unfounded speculation!”

Divine Mercy devotions popping into devotional books, websites, and Facebook pages is more “unfounded speculation.”

Read this and shut up
https://stas.org/en/news-events/news/letter-superior-general-friends-and-benefactors-n-89-55521

So how can you say Francis( who was ordained in the New Rite) is the Pope but then doubt the ordinations of N. O priests in general?

You should ask Archbishop Lefebvre, Bishop Tissier, Fr. Peter Scott, Fr. Calderon, or read SSPX articles from prior to the election of BXVI (all of whom/which cast doubts upon the validity of the new rites, and particularly the new rite of episcopal consecration).

They didn’t seem to draw the same implications as you do (but the SSPX hasn’t changed!).

Ps: Francis was ordained by Archbishop Castellano (who was himself consecrated according to the old Rite in 1946), so the concern regarding invalid ordination due to invalid episcopal consecration does not arise; the concern in validity of the new rite of priestly ordination due to defect in form is much weaker than that regarding defect of form in the new rite of episcopal consecration.