Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2

Author Topic: Time to red light the SSPX?  (Read 9342 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NotBishopFellay

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
  • Reputation: +23/-5
  • Gender: Male
Time to red light the SSPX?
« on: December 23, 2016, 04:11:28 PM »
  • Thanks!5
  • No Thanks!3
    • The SSPX should only be red lighted once they become a danger to our faith, right?

    Well get a load of this! My friend just sent me an e-mail about an SSPX priest at her parish.

    Quote
    "[my] priest said it's normal for boys this age to experiment [with unnatural vice]. A few years earlier it was reported that he said children should be exposed to sin, as they have to live in a world with it. As in, let them be exposed to things that children should NOT be exposed to. (I even read this in a thread on Cathinfo in ~2012-2013 I think, but unfortuntely I could never find it again)

    You won't believe this. That priest is now teaching moral theology at the new seminary in VA. In general, folks in the parish (the ones who are paying attention) always thought of him as a liberal or at least shaky theology, but again, I know that's a very general statement that means nothing on an internet forum.  But anyway, with a priest like him in charge of moral theology, I have no hope that the future SSPX priests will be well-formed in any way.  I wonder if he thinks it would be "normal" for seminarians to experiment with stuff like that?  When I read that he would be stationed at the seminary at all, I thought, oh no; hopefully he'll just be doing penance in the background or something.  But when I heard he would be teaching moral theology, aye yi yi."


    This is where the rubber hits the road. The liberalism is real, and it's coming to an SSPX parish near you. In particular, via the new younger crop of priests. Maybe we should only red light those SSPX chapels with newly ordained priests. Still, this is pretty big news.
    Logged

    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 791
    • Reputation: +818/-103
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #1 on: December 23, 2016, 06:18:34 PM »
  • Thanks!6
  • No Thanks!4
    • Without concrete names and dates this is just gossip.  Move along....nothing to see here folks!
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41860
    • Reputation: +23918/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #2 on: December 23, 2016, 07:01:38 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!4
    • Quote from: Ekim
    Without concrete names and dates this is just gossip.  Move along....nothing to see here folks!


    Agreed.
    Logged

    Offline RogerThat

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 70
    • Reputation: +64/-114
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #3 on: December 23, 2016, 08:55:42 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!9
    • In my opinion, priests of this "Resistance" must be "red-lighted" because they act without any moral/theological guidance, have no spiritual advisers. spread untruths about the validity of sacraments, and spread gossip about churchmen.
    Logged

    Offline songbird

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4670
    • Reputation: +1765/-353
    • Gender: Female
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #4 on: December 23, 2016, 09:59:31 PM »
  • Thanks!5
  • No Thanks!0
    • Lest we forget Post Falls.
    Logged

    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #5 on: December 23, 2016, 10:01:17 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: RogerThat
    In my opinion, priests of this "Resistance" must be "red-lighted" because they act without any moral/theological guidance, have no spiritual advisers. spread untruths about the validity of sacraments, and spread gossip about churchmen.
    Could you please expound in what "Resistance" you are referring to?
    Logged

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #6 on: December 23, 2016, 11:28:33 PM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: BishopFellay
    The SSPX should only be red lighted once they become a danger to our faith, right?

    Well get a load of this! My friend just sent me an e-mail about an SSPX priest at her parish.

    Quote
    "[my] priest said it's normal for boys this age to experiment [with unnatural vice]. A few years earlier it was reported that he said children should be exposed to sin, as they have to live in a world with it. As in, let them be exposed to things that children should NOT be exposed to. (I even read this in a thread on Cathinfo in ~2012-2013 I think, but unfortunately I could never find it again)


    Yes!  A big Red Light for STOP the experimenting!

    1. SSPX school boys... stop experimenting with sex.

    2. Bp. Fellay... stop experimenting with newChurch, Jansenism and fake dogmas, like implicit baptism.

    3. Fr, Wegner... stop experimenting with Usury... immediately.

    4. Fr. Albert and Bp. de Galaretta, stop experimenting with Dominican orders

    And on an on...








    Logged
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline Lighthouse

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 872
    • Reputation: +580/-27
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #7 on: December 24, 2016, 01:02:11 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: songbird
    Lest we forget Post Falls.



    Well, apparently just about everybody has.  Did that swamp ever get drained?
    Logged

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #8 on: December 24, 2016, 01:50:20 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: BishopFellay


    My priest said it's normal for boys this age to experiment [with unnatural vice]. A few years earlier it was reported that he said children should be exposed to sin, as they have to live in a world with it. As in, let them be exposed to things that children should NOT be exposed to. (I even read this in a thread on Cathinfo in ~2012-2013 I think, but unfortuntely I could never find it again)

    You won't believe this. That priest is now teaching moral theology at the new seminary in VA. In general, folks in the parish (the ones who are paying attention) always thought of him as a liberal or at least shaky theology


    The person you describe  should be identified as a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ, not a liberal. What he is teaching is not liberalism but aberrosɛҳuąƖity.
    Logged
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline mw2016

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +765/-544
    • Gender: Female
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #9 on: December 24, 2016, 09:48:04 AM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
    • Stop running cover for the wolves in sheep's clothing and speak plainly.

    Out a priest who says "kids should be exposed to unnatural vice." If he said this in public, or in the context of a scandal like Post Falls, it is on him - not on whoever is warning the public so they can protect their sons.


    Who's on staff at Dillwyn?


    http://stas.org/en/seminary-professors
    Logged

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41860
    • Reputation: +23918/-4344
    • Gender: Male
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #10 on: December 24, 2016, 09:50:40 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!3
    • Quote from: Ladislaus
    Quote from: Ekim
    Without concrete names and dates this is just gossip.  Move along....nothing to see here folks!


    Agreed.


    If this is true, then out with the name(s).
    Logged

    Offline mw2016

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +765/-544
    • Gender: Female
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #11 on: December 24, 2016, 09:59:27 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Their page says they've raised $36.2 million - good grief.

    https://www.newseminaryproject.org/donate/
    Logged

    Offline mw2016

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +765/-544
    • Gender: Female
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #12 on: December 24, 2016, 10:19:30 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • This one is a good reminder.

    SSPX seminarian expelled for calling out his professor for teaching error:

    http://www.ecclesiamilitans.com/2014/06/16/heresy-taught-at-the-sspx-seminary/
    Logged

    Offline mw2016

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1351
    • Reputation: +765/-544
    • Gender: Female
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #13 on: December 24, 2016, 10:21:54 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
    • In total, 2016 has seen 23 new
    priests ordained for the SSPX,
    bringing the total up to 613 who
    are aided by 117 brothers and 80
    oblate sisters. In its six seminaries
    across the world, 215 young men,
    as well as 40 pre-seminarians,
    were registered at the beginning
    of the academic year.


    http://www.dici.org/en/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/DICI347_english.pdf
    Logged

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7782
    • Reputation: +4577/-579
    • Gender: Female
    Time to red light the SSPX?
    « Reply #14 on: December 24, 2016, 02:52:13 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: Incredulous
     
    1. SSPX school boys... stop experimenting with sex.

    2. Bp. Fellay... stop experimenting with newChurch, Jansenism and fake dogmas, like implicit baptism.

    3. Fr, Wegner... stop experimenting with Usury... immediately.

    4. Fr. Albert and Bp. de Galaretta, stop experimenting with Dominican orders

    And on an on...




    Yes to all that!
    Logged
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.
    Pages: [1] 2
    « previous next »