Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??  (Read 1064 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cosmas

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 486
  • Reputation: +277/-141
  • Gender: Male
Since June 21, 2011, the Superior of the SSPX and Father Schmidberger have lodged a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor of Belgium against Father Paul Schoonbroodt, the last “excommunicated” living from the coronations of 1988.
Taking example on the former conciliar "bishop" of Liège, the current and former successors of Archbishop Lefebvre hysterically persecute the priest who founded the Carmel of Quiévrain with the help of Archbishop Lefebvre and who received the support of the archbishop to build his church, despite the civil persecutions he suffered from the Conciliar Church.
And it is according to the indications verbally provided to him by the gendarme who questioned Father Schoonbroodt that:
Three charges emerge insofar as Father Schoonbroodt was able to become aware of them in the absence of his possibility of access to the written docuмent of the complaint made against him:

Faced with these astonishing accusations from the two successors of Archbishop Lefebvre , Father Schoonbroodt makes a statement in which he vigorously rejects these accusations.
This incredible action by Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger, justified by their common desire to block the dissemination of the full version of Archbishop Lefebvre's sermons which they have kept hidden for 20 years, exposes in broad daylight that Archbishop Fellay and the Abbot Schmidberger now ride for the globalized and masonized Conciliar Church and for the apostate Abbot Ratzinger-Benedict XVI.
They thus publicly manifest their ulterior motives: Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger behave as real and determined enemies of Father Schoonbroodt while in the same direction, they seek to win the favors and friendship of the apostate Abbot Ratzinger - Benedict XVI . The Swiss bishop and the German priest, his guru, have clearly chosen their camp: that of the globalized and masonized Conciliar Church and of the rejection of Archbishop Lefebvre's fight against this apostate Conciliar Church to preserve the sacramentally VALID Catholic sacrificial Priesthood.

 


Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31200
  • Reputation: +27117/-494
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2021, 12:19:03 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Neo-SSPX continues to suppress the works of +ABL, because the founder's words of wisdom would condemn the recent moves of the SSPX. It's that simple.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline donkath

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1517
    • Reputation: +616/-116
    • Gender: Female
      • h
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #2 on: June 02, 2021, 01:15:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Source please?
    "In His wisdom," says St. Gregory, "almighty God preferred rather to bring good out of evil than never allow evil to occur."

    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 775
    • Reputation: +206/-137
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #3 on: June 02, 2021, 01:56:59 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Isn't Fr. Paul Schoonbroodt a sedevacantist? He was sued not just by Bishop Fellay and Fr. Schmidberger, but also by Fr. de Cacqueray. There seems to be more than meets the eye.

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #4 on: June 02, 2021, 11:05:48 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Correct.  There's a lot more to the story than meets the eye and that Bp. Fellay doesn't care to talk about it.:popcorn:





    +ABL's brother, Joseph Lefebvre collaborated with the Belgian Father Schoonbroodt and Louis Remy to publish +ABL's hard hitting sermons against newChurch.

    This neoSSPX intrigue includes the likes of Bp. Fellay, Fr. Schmidberger, Max Krah and possibly Father Schoonbroodt's masonic assassination.
    Father died from injuries of a mysterious hit & run driver in April 2012.



    Background on Father Schoonbroodt:
     

    Translation:

    Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger directly filed a criminal complaint against Father Schoonbroodt before the Public Prosecutor in Belgium.

    On June 21, 2011, the Superior of the SSPX, Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger filed a criminal complaint with the Public Prosecutor of Belgium, against Father Paul Schoonbroodt.  Note: Schoonbroodt was "excommunicated" in 1988 for supporting Archbishop Lefebvre's consecrations of four Bishops.

    Following the example of the former "bishop" Conciliar de Liège, these successors of Archbishop Lefebvre hysterically persecuted the Holy priest who founded the Caramel of Quiévrain with the help of Archbishop Lefebvre.  Father Schoonbroodt had received the support of Archbishop to build his church, despite the persecution he suffered from excommunication by the Conciliar Church.


    Instead of receiving a normal written complaint, a policeman read three SSPX charges to abbot Schoonbroodt:

    1. The office of St. Pius X office in Suresnes accused the abbot Schoonbroodt of theft of intellectual property owned by the SSPX.
    These were the public sermons of Archbishop Lefebvre.

    2. Bishop Fellay and Maximilian Krah accused the abbot Schoonbroodt of libel for referring to the financial association’s between Bishop and his business lawyer (Krah) in the joint management of several investment companies.

    3. Bishop Fellay and Maximilian Krah also accused the abbot Schoonbroodt of racism and xenophobia.

    Faced with these startling accusations from the two successors of Archbishop Lefebvre, Father Schoonbroodt made a statement in which he strongly rejects these accusations.

    This unprecedented action of Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger, justified by their common will to block the release of the full sermons of Archbishop Lefebvre which they had kept hidden for 20 years. This action exposes Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger as now running with the globalized freemasonic Conciliar Church led by the apostate priest Ratzinger-Benedict XVI.

    It publicly exposes their ulterior motives: Bishop Fellay and Father Schmidberger behave as real enemies determined to get abbot Schoonbroodt while seeking to curry favor and friendship of Father Ratzinger apostate Benedict XVI.

    The bishop and the Swiss German priest, attorney Krah, have clearly chosen their side: that of the Conciliar Church globalized Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ.

    They reject of the battle of Archbishop Lefebvre against this apostate Conciliar church to preserve the Sacramentally valid sacrificial Catholic priesthood.


    http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php?a=topic&t=15187&f=4&min=60&num=10


    Here's a summary posted by Ethelred in 2016


    Well, that’s nearly unbelievable. So to sum up the three "charges" in own words :

    (1) Fr. Schoonbroodt publishes sermons of the good Archbishop Lefebvre and because of this he’s now persecuted by the "digital content industry" in Menzingen.

    (2) Fr. Schoonbroodt published the French translation of the famous Krahgate, which unmasks the Zionist Krah and his helpers, and is persecuted because of this.

    (3) Fr. Schoonbroodt is persecuted because of an alleged "racism" and "xenophobia". Well, there’s the usual Jєωιѕн ɠƖobaƖıst agenda again which brainwashes the west since decades. This one’s not worth one single comment.

    So Bp. Fellay, Fr. Schmidberger and their Zionist bloodhound Krah now use the anti-christian, communist EU states in order to persecute the old Fr. Schoonbroodt.

    The official SSPX leadership persecutes the propagation of Archbishop Lefebvre’s words. What we heard as theoretical talking so far we’ve got now in cold print  because of the "case Schoonbroodt".

    How many souls converted to the holy roman-catholic Church because of the intense word of Archbishop Lefebvre? I personally know several of them and they’re the most faithful catholics I know. The pseudo followers of the Archbishop however dare to choke off his important words which are just a tool of Good.

    I think it’s just to say that they’re out of their little minds because they do so and because they think they could ally with the anti-christian European states in order to reach their ignoble goals.

    It’s an act against God to hinder the free publication of the important words of the Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. There’s no "copyright" for these words — God alone owns them! So it’s a treachery against God and his servant Archbishop Lefebvre. For sure this won’t go unpunished.
    Obviously as a punishment for their unfaithfulness they’ve already lost all judgement. We see it now and we already saw it when Bp. Fellay, Fr. Pfluger and Fr. Schmidberger publicly defamed Bishop Williamson beginning with January 2009.

    This will soon drop back on them because the very same anti-christian states which they allied and now again ally with will persecute any christian and in particular any cleric. So will they join Bishop Williamson’s exile? Hardly, because what my local SSPX priests who know that Menzingen, Jaidhof and Stuttgart are living in a dreamland, tell me: "When the soon to come persecution of Christians starts we priest will be killed first…"

    Whilst I don’t overall agree with www.virgo-maria.org , I can repeat what a trustfully SSPX priest knowing him told me: Fr. Schoonbroodt is a devout catholic priest who follows Archbishop Lefebvre. The legal actions against him by Bp. Fellay and Fr. Schmidberger, executed by their Zionist Krah, are unjust.

    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline cosmas

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 486
    • Reputation: +277/-141
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #5 on: June 02, 2021, 11:09:05 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Trento, were you ever favored with two Eucharistic Miracles ?
    VIDEO 06: The Priest Paul Schoonbroodt recounts the two Eucharistic miracles of Steffeshausen from which he was favored
    Published on November 12, 2011
    The High Altar of the parish church of Steffeshausen (Belgium) where the two Eucharistic miracles of October 3 and December 12, 1971 took place, while Abbot Schoonbroodt was saying the Mass of St. Pius V.
    The last "excommunicated" living from the sacres of Écône in 1988, the priest Paul Schoonbroodt tells how consecrated hosts that he was going to distribute to the faithful appeared marked on their edges with a stain of fresh blood, as well as later the great host at the altar.
    During his solemn declaration of October 17, 2011, on the feast of Saint Marguerite-Marie Alacoque,seer of the apparitions of the Sacred Heart in Paray-Le-Monial, Mr. Curé Paul Schoonbroodt announced his next revelation of the Eucharistic miracles he witnessed. We are there.

    Watch the video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sb3ukmzba1w
     
    In 1971, just after his installation as parish priest in Steffeshausen, Curé Schoonbroodt was favored by a double Eucharistic miracle. The last "excommunicated" living from the sacres of 1988, M. le Curé Paul Schoonbroodt recounts his installation in his parish church in 1971 in Belgium in Steffeshausen, then the double Eucharistic miracle of October 3 and December 12, 1971, which, forty years before his public revelation, now confirms him in his fight for the preservation of the sacramentally valid Catholic Priesthood and against the generalization of a false clergy invalid in the Conciliar Church since 1969, following the total abandonment on June 18, 1968 of the episcopal consecration rite of Latin rite twice millennia of the Church following the Liturgical Reformation resulting from Vatican II. Steffeshausen, Belgium, October 2011.
    Video on YouTube (English version)

    See the video on YouTube (English version): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdCi2-urbN8
     
    In 1971, just after his installation as parish priest in Steffeshausen, Father Schoonbroodt was " favoured " with a double eucharistic miracle.
    Last " excommunicated " priest still alive (after the 1988 consecrations), Father Schoonbroodt relates his installation in his parish church of Steffeshausen (Belgium) in 1971 and the double Eucharistic miracle of 3d October and 12th December 1971. These miraculous events – which took place fourty years before being publicly disclosed – confirms him in his fight for the preservation of the sacramentally valid Catholic Priesthood and against the generalization of a false and invalid clergy in the Newchurch since 1969, following the total relinquishment on the 18th of June 1968 of the two thousand-year old Latin rite of episcopal consecration due to the reforms stemming of Vatican II. Steffeshausen (Belgium), October 2011-10-30.

     

    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 775
    • Reputation: +206/-137
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #6 on: June 02, 2021, 11:29:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Any supposed miracles need to be investigated or else we risk falling in to the same errors as Medjugorje etc.

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #7 on: June 03, 2021, 09:49:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Any supposed miracles need to be investigated or else we risk falling in to the same errors as Medjugorje etc.

    True, but who would investigate it? Surely not the leaders in the conciliar church. And not the leadership of the SSPX, who have disdain for Fr. Schoonbroodt.

    I'm not a fanatic about eucharistic miracles by any means, but this Fr. Schoonbroodt seems legit, at least on first glance. And the big difference between him and the nutty Medj people is that the nutty Medj people are, for the most part, Charismatics. That doesn't appear to be the case with Fr. Schoonbroot, though I don't know enough about it to speculate further. This is the first I've heard of it, or taken time to read about it. But I'd like to know more about it.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline trento

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 775
    • Reputation: +206/-137
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #8 on: June 04, 2021, 01:49:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • True, but who would investigate it? Surely not the leaders in the conciliar church. And not the leadership of the SSPX, who have disdain for Fr. Schoonbroodt.

    I'm not a fanatic about eucharistic miracles by any means, but this Fr. Schoonbroodt seems legit, at least on first glance. And the big difference between him and the nutty Medj people is that the nutty Medj people are, for the most part, Charismatics. That doesn't appear to be the case with Fr. Schoonbroot, though I don't know enough about it to speculate further. This is the first I've heard of it, or taken time to read about it. But I'd like to know more about it.
    Do check out who approved Akita which is also endorsed by Bp. Williamson and the SSPX in general.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #9 on: June 04, 2021, 05:59:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • How was this Father Schoonbroodt "excommunicated" in 1988?  Only +Lefebvre, +de Castro Mayer and the consecrands were excommunicated.

    Or was he excommunicated for some other reason?

    Offline Meg

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6173
    • Reputation: +3147/-2941
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #10 on: June 04, 2021, 06:55:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do check out who approved Akita which is also endorsed by Bp. Williamson and the SSPX in general.

    I'm actually okay with Akita, but I don't think that a definitive judgment has been made by the conciliar church (conciliar Holy See) as to the authenticity of Akita.

    My point was that the conciliar church is not likely to investigate any supposed miracle at a trad chapel.
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 41908
    • Reputation: +23946/-4345
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Why is Bishop Fellay afraid to release the Archbishop's Sermons ??
    « Reply #11 on: June 04, 2021, 09:39:50 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • True, but who would investigate it? Surely not the leaders in the conciliar church. And not the leadership of the SSPX, who have disdain for Fr. Schoonbroodt.

    Why do the SSPX have a disdain for Fr. Schoonbroodt?  I'm missing some of the back story here.  Was it just for publishing the sermons?