Author Topic: Thirty Days in the Boston Seminary (Read 97695 times)

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #330 on:** November 10, 2015, 10:15:18 AM »

Quote from: ultrarigorist

Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #331 on:** November 10, 2015, 10:25:31 AM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

Wow, he comes out swinging on Tony La Rosa for trying to foster a rebellion. At about 20 minutes he affirms most authoritatively and repetitively that Ambrose is a valid priest, a valid bishop, and a true Catholic.

At 28 minutes he says something extremely suspect to me. He claims that if you were ever once Catholic and leave to join some Protestant 'church' or Orthodox 'church' you remain Catholic, though you have sinned against your Faith. I would have to listen again, but I am asking if someone can help me understand what he is saying here.

Apparently, it's not over until the fat lady sings and she ain't singing anytime soon.

1st Mansion Tenant · « **Reply #332 on:** November 10, 2015, 11:20:08 AM »

Good thing I got up in the middle of the night with a bout of insomnia or I would have missed it-- taken down already, really?

Fr sounded tired and stumbled over many of the various names, dates and titles, and the whole thing was rather convoluted- which is excusable considering the labyrinthine nature of the whole tangled affair- but the gist seems to be that he still believes Ambrose to be a valid and Catholic priest and bishop.

PS- How do you get *8* bishops together for a formal function without it being a huge deal that has lots of photos and a reception afterward, and plenty of witnesses and docuмentations?

Matthew · « **Reply #333 on:** November 10, 2015, 11:27:07 AM »

Quote from: 1st Mansion Tenant

Good thing I got up in the middle of the night with a bout of insomnia or I would have missed it-- taken down already, really?

PS- How do you get *8* bishops together for a formal function without it being a huge deal that has lots of photos and a reception afterward, and plenty of witnesses and docuмentations?

Don't worry, it's still here on CathInfo, in two different places. In fact, it's even better than the original. The copy here has been made louder, and compressed to MP3 form taking 1/2 the size.

http://www.cathinfo.com/Fr-Pfeiffer-Ambrose.mp3

Regarding your second point -- yes, that would be like a minor conclave!

Bishop Faure is coming to Houston on the 29th of this month, and I guarantee you it will be a much bigger deal than Sunday Mass. Just for starters, there will be a conference and potluck afterwards, but I also know that people are coming from hundreds of miles around (myself included). That's ONE bishop.

Could you imagine the turnout, if Bishops Williamson and Faure announced they were going to consecrate another bishop? And maybe +de Mallerais was joining as well? Even 4 trad Bishops in one place, you'd have people flying in from other countries to be there, plus coming from ALL OVER the U.S.A. no matter where the event was being held.

It's not that outlandish either -- +Williamson has promised to consecrate more bishops in the future. I certainly look forward to that day! And who knows where +de Mallerais will end up, once his precious SSPX makes a deal with Rome.

Croixalist · « **Reply #334 on:** November 10, 2015, 11:54:09 AM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

We can always depend on you taking one step forward and two steps back.

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #335 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:03:27 PM »

Quote from: Croixalist

Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

We can always depend on you taking one step forward and two steps back.

I was asked anout the recording by Tony La Rosa, who has given me permission to report this much back to all here. I offered to remove the audio recording, and so I did. This is not two steps back. It is honoring a personal request, one I felt was justified.

It is about moving forward.

richard · « **Reply #336 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:12:45 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: Croixalist
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

We can always depend on you taking one step forward and two steps back.

I was asked anout the recording by Tony La Rosa, who has given me permission to report this much back to all here. I offered to remove the audio recording, and so I did. This is not two steps back. It is honoring a personal request, one I felt was justified.

It is about moving forward.

Did Tony Larosa ask you to take it down?

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #337 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:22:57 PM »

Quote from: richard

Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: Croixalist
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

We can always depend on you taking one step forward and two steps back.

I was asked anout the recording by Tony La Rosa, who has given me permission to report this much back to all here. I offered to remove the audio recording, and so I did. This is not two steps back. It is honoring a personal request, one I felt was justified.

It is about moving forward.

Did Tony Larosa ask you to take it down?

I took it down after I asked Tony La Rosa if he would like me to take it down, after a brief exchange of emails. I am not at liberty to give his reasons, though I believe it is the best decision.

Matthew · « **Reply #338 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:23:46 PM »

Well it's just too bad for him.

It's none of his concern. This is between Fr. Pfeiffer, the seminarians, the Resistance, and the good of the Catholic Church.

This conference to the seminarians has no bearing on Tony La Rosa personally. What, did Father mention some rash Tony la Rosa has or something? Give me a break.

OHCA · « **Reply #339 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:26:53 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

To call you a hack would be more flattery than you deserve.

PAT317 · « **Reply #340 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:28:57 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

This conference to the seminarians has no bearing on Tony La Rosa personally. What, did Father mention some rash Tony la Rosa has or something? Give me a break.

Matthew · « **Reply #341 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:30:17 PM »

Tony La Rosa is the one who "wouldn't draw any conclusions" about the faked Ambrose docuмent (which he posted a few days ago on his blog). Remember this from a few days ago?

Now that his ONE issue with Fr. Pfeiffer has been resolved (i.e., Ambrose), I think he wants to STAY on good terms with Boston, KY from this point forward.

Hence his animosity with this conference, which makes Fr. Pfeiffer look bad.

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #342 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:33:36 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

To call you a hack would be more flattery than you deserve.

Why do you feel the need to insult me? What have I done that has offended you so?

Matthew · « **Reply #343 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:35:51 PM »

Tony La Rosa is in TORONTO --

Toronto is where the comment came a few years ago, "If you guys would red light the SSPX like we are, maybe God would bless you and you'd get Mass more often..."

Now look at them -- jumping from the warm water of the frog pot (SSPX) into the blazing fire.

OHCA · « **Reply #344 on:** November 10, 2015, 12:45:56 PM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: richard
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: Croixalist
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: ultrarigorist
Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!

I removed it upon a personal and private request, which I felt I should honor.

We can always depend on you taking one step forward and two steps back.

I was asked anout the recording by Tony La Rosa, who has given me permission to report this much back to all here. I offered to remove the audio recording, and so I did. This is not two steps back. It is honoring a personal request, one I felt was justified.

It is about moving forward.

Did Tony Larosa ask you to take it down?

I took it down after I asked Tony La Rosa if he would like me to take it down, after a brief exchange of emails. I am not at liberty to give his reasons, though I believe it is the best decision.

Sounds like you really learned how things are done in your four semesters of jewrnalism.