Author Topic: Thirty Days in the Boston Seminary (Read 95187 times)

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #240 on:** November 06, 2015, 07:11:11 AM »

Quote from: Chiara

Manuel, another question. Doubtless, you've seen the thread stating that Fr. Hewko said OLMC will not be associated with Ambrose. Can you confirm, deny or elaborate on this? Is this Fr. Hewko's opinion/position or that of both priests?

I confirmed the conversation with Father Hewko.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #241 on:** November 06, 2015, 07:13:49 AM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: Chiara
Manuel, another question. Doubtless, you've seen the thread stating that Fr. Hewko said OLMC will not be associated with Ambrose. Can you confirm, deny or elaborate on this? Is this Fr. Hewko's opinion/position or that of both priests?

I confirmed the conversation with Father Hewko.

So does this mean that Fr. Hewko will leave that cult when Ambrose returns to offer "Mass"?

It seems clear to all that Fr. Pfeiffer charging full speed ahead. It's obvious to all that Fr. Hewko is deceived and confused. I doubt Ambrose is going away anytime soon.

Ecclesiae · « **Reply #242 on:** November 06, 2015, 07:16:12 AM »

What a disgusting blog http://30daysintheseminary.blogspot.com/2015/11/day-thirteen-highs-and-lows.html
It´s all about the Idol Pablo, a love hymn to pablo the Amateur Exorcist. Manuel has no problem dedicating his blog to help the Kentucky group and his best friend Pablo (but will not succeed). Why does he not write a love hymn to Christ or to God the Father...? Manuel C. why don´t you do something useful? Why don´t you invest your time in praising God instead of men? Pleas take care that you do not take the wide road that leads to...

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #243 on:** November 06, 2015, 07:59:15 AM »

Quote from: Ecclesiae

What a disgusting blog http://30daysintheseminary.blogspot.com/2015/11/day-thirteen-highs-and-lows.html
It´s all about the Idol Pablo, a love hymn to pablo the Amateur Exorcist. Manuel has no problem dedicating his blog to help the Kentucky group and his best friend Pablo (but will not succeed). Why does he not write a love hymn to Christ or to God the Father...? Manuel C. why don´t you do something useful? Why don´t you invest your time in praising God instead of men? Pleas take care that you do not take the wide road that leads to...

It is not all about Pablo, and it is not a love hymn. It seems that you wish to twist my words to attack me, as a means to attack Pablo, Father Pfeiffer and the seminary. If I am.wrong in this assumption, I would love to be corrected in this.

I have been fair, I have listened to others, I have brought the information to the attention of Fathers Hewko and Pfeiffer, which may have helped in their recent decision, as reported on this site earlier. I have not sought to do any injury to you or to anyone here.

I ask for the same level of courtesy, charity and patience, Ecclesiae. If you have an issue with me or with what I have written, please contact me directly, or post your questions or concerns here.

I am far from perfect, and I appreciate any charitable advice and corrections from fellow Catholics.

One piece of advice I have received was to write less about food on my blog. I admit that I wrote too much about what the seminarians ate, and not enough about the seminary functions.

This was good advice, something I can use to better myself.

As always, if you have any questions or comments, for myself or for the Fathers, I will do my best to get answers for you.

These are tough times, and they will only get harder. Please pray for me, and for all who are here in Boston, Kentucky.

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #244 on:** November 06, 2015, 08:07:21 AM »

Manuel, I'm confused.

Are you saying that Fr Pfeiffer will no longer allow Ambrose to service any Resistance mission and will not be invited back to OLMC in any capacity?

JPaul · « **Reply #245 on:** November 06, 2015, 08:09:31 AM »

Manuel,
It is admirable that you brought information to the Fathers and reported how their hard headedness was not going down very well out in the world.
But sadly they had more than enough information and pleading from friends and the pews for them to take stock and act long before the most serious damage was done. Willfull men sometimes do not listen and they have squandered the progress that God may have granted to them.

It is simply another step in the inevitable disintegration of the SSPX.

But in the end, this action is too little, too late. You can pass that on.

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #246 on:** November 06, 2015, 08:44:52 AM »

Quote from: TheRealMcCoy

Manuel, I'm confused.

Are you saying that Fr Pfeiffer will no longer allow Ambrose to service any Resistance mission and will not be invited back to OLMC in any capacity?

It may be so, until the issues brought up on this site and others have been thoroughly investigated.

Two of these issues are the doctored photograph and the claims of being consecrated by Cardinal Slipjy.

This is my understanding of the events, based on my conversations with Fathers Pfeiffer and Hewko:

Father did an initial, five-month investigation, which concluded that Ambrose was a priest, and Catholic Bishop. This was done before Ambrose was allowed to visit and say Mass.

When other information came forth, it became clear that the investigation had to be reopened, specifically because of the photograph and the first consecration.

I do not believe that his ordination was in doubt, nor the second consecration, as the paperwork came not from Ambrose, but from the Eparchy of Toronto and other reputable sources.

Still, it has been questioned, and those questions need answers. The investigative work done here needs to be addressed, and this is what I believe is going on now, and why Father Hewko responded as such yesterday.

As always, I would love to forward any questions or concerns to the Fathers.

Thank you for your patience with me, and with my blog. God bless.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #247 on:** November 06, 2015, 09:02:13 AM »

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: TheRealMcCoy
Manuel, I'm confused.

Are you saying that Fr Pfeiffer will no longer allow Ambrose to service any Resistance mission and will not be invited back to OLMC in any capacity?

It may be so, until the issues brought up on this site and others have been thoroughly investigated.

Two of these issues are the doctored photograph and the claims of being consecrated by Cardinal Slipjy.

This is my understanding of the events, based on my conversations with Fathers Pfeiffer and Hewko:

Father did an initial, five-month investigation, which concluded that Ambrose was a priest, and Catholic Bishop. This was done before Ambrose was allowed to visit and say Mass.

When other information came forth, it became clear that the investigation had to be reopened, specifically because of the photograph and the first consecration.

I do not believe that his ordination was in doubt, nor the second consecration, as the paperwork came not from Ambrose, but from the Eparchy of Toronto and other reputable sources.

Still, it has been questioned, and those questions need answers. The investigative work done here needs to be addressed, and this is what I believe is going on now, and why Father Hewko responded as such yesterday.

As always, I would love to forward any questions or concerns to the Fathers.

Thank you for your patience with me, and with my blog. God bless.

Manuel, I am going to make an assumption. My assumption is based on what I have observed going on for the past couple of years. The most compelling of these is the fact that last year Fr. Pfeiffer gave a conference in Canada where he and the laity are "smashing" Bishop Williamson. In this conference he makes it very clear that "God will provide", and that "God will send us a Catholic bishop". Apparently, Fr. Chazal was 'hip' to this because in his video he says "not this one, not this time, this one isn't from God". He made a clear reference to this quote from Fr. Pfeiffer. This is a clear sign that Fr. Pfeiffer was searching or at least hoping for a bishop. Then miraculously, around this same time a magical "bishop" calls him up. Thats's a good story for children, but I'm not buying it. I have no scruple with publicly saying that I do not believe Fr. Pfeiffer was sought out by this "gift from God". I don't believe it for a second. A lie such as this is certaibly grave and seems to indicate apostasy. But you know what, if you are a 'brother' when this Ambrosian Mickey Mouse returns, the chances of you staying and going along with the whole thing are a lot greater. Do you really think Fr. Pfeiffer has not considered and estimated his losses for continuing in the Mickey Mouse line? Certainly he has. Right now he is trying to soften that loss, and you are the vehicle he is using to do that. When this "bishop" returns, maybe you'll remember what I said and shake the dust from your feet.

JPaul · « **Reply #248 on:** November 06, 2015, 09:05:57 AM »

Will the Fathers enlighten us as to who the two secret Bishops are?

Something here does not add up, They were investigating him from before, during , and now after his arrival and again after his departure, and yet he was allowed access to the souls in their care throughout this process.

What is that all about?

And, don't forget, the two secret Bishops.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #249 on:** November 06, 2015, 09:09:27 AM »

Quote from: J.Paul

Will the Fathers enlighten us as to who the two secret Bishops are?

One more lie probably. He seems to be a pathological liar.

JPaul · « **Reply #250 on:** November 06, 2015, 09:12:46 AM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Quote from: J.Paul
Will the Fathers enlighten us as to who the two secret Bishops are?

One more lie probably. He seems to be a pathological liar.

His lies were easily and continually accepted by the priests.

Croixalist · « **Reply #251 on:** November 06, 2015, 11:06:40 AM »

On his thirteenth day at Boston, Manuel did send to me...

Thirteen thwarted theories,
Twelve devils delving,
Eleven Pablos preaching,
Ten leaps of logic,
Nine loan sharks leering,
Eight minds a-melting,
Seven shills a-shilling,
Six priests vacating,
Five folding chairs!
Four scolding words,
Three henchmen,
Two troubled tweets,
and a Pfeiffer in a fig tree!

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #252 on:** November 06, 2015, 12:20:52 PM »

test

Quote

Martin clearly demonstrates that they are not finished with this guy. They are "still investigating." The Weasel can pop back up at any time - say somewhere around February 2nd to confer the tonsures.

Notice that OLMC is still speaking through anonymous internet posters and their friendly blogger. They are not man enough and priestly enough to address the public directly, nor are they willing to completely renounce their association with Ambrose. They are saving him for later - shelving him for now - so that they can keep what few supporters they still have.

Furthermore, Martin has communicated to us an untruth.

Fr. Pfeiffer told him to report that certain "other information came forth" after they did their initial investigation; and that this information was not known to them before "Ambrose was allowed to visit and say Mass." [Forget about the fact that they let him do even more damage the week of October 25th after scads more damning evidence came to light.]

Here are some pertinent facts:

I learned Ambrose's name on Thursday, September 10, 2015. I immediately did a google search and found the Gregory of Denver information, plus some blog entries, which clearly indicated that Ambrose belonged to the schismatic groups. That very night, I sent both Pfeiffer and Hewko an email with the links. Hewko responded the same night. I have these emails and can reproduce them if necessary.

The following day I had a face to face meeting with Fr. Pfeiffer. We discussed my research. He told me that Greg Taylor had been looking into this for the past two months, and had come across the same information. Fr. Pfeiffer showed me the photoshopped picture with Slipjy, and we discussed it. He argued that it was not photoshopped. The picture was downloaded to his computer.

Fr. Pfeiffer allowed Ambrose to say the Sunday Mass that weekend with full knowledge of the fake picture and the schismatic associations.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #253 on:** November 06, 2015, 12:44:19 PM »

Quote from: TheRealMcCoy

test
Quote
Martin clearly demonstrates that they are not finished with this guy. They are "still investigating." The Weasel can pop back up at any time - say somewhere around February 2nd to confer the tonsures.

Notice that OLMC is still speaking through anonymous internet posters and their friendly blogger. They are not man enough and priestly enough to address the public directly, nor are they willing to completely renounce their association with Ambrose. They are saving him for later - shelving him for now - so that they can keep what few supporters they still have.

Furthermore, Martin has communicated to us an untruth.

Fr. Pfeiffer told him to report that certain "other information came forth" after they did their initial investigation; and that this information was not known to them before "Ambrose was allowed to visit and say Mass." [Forget about the fact that they let him do even more damage the week of October 25th after scads more damning evidence came to light.]

Here are some pertinent facts:

I learned Ambrose's name on Thursday, September 10, 2015. I immediately did a google search and found the Gregory of Denver information, plus some blog entries, which clearly indicated that Ambrose belonged to the schismatic groups. That very night, I sent both Pfeiffer and Hewko an email with the links. Hewko responded the same night. I have these emails and can reproduce them if necessary.

The following day I had a face to face meeting with Fr. Pfeiffer. We discussed my research. He told me that Greg Taylor had been looking into this for the past two months, and had come across the same information. Fr. Pfeiffer showed me the photoshopped picture with Slipjy, and we discussed it. He argued that it was not photoshopped. The picture was downloaded to his computer.

Fr. Pfeiffer allowed Ambrose to say the Sunday Mass that weekend with full knowledge of the fake picture and the schismatic associations.

Communicatio in sacris.

TheRealMcCoy · « **Reply #254 on:** November 06, 2015, 02:09:34 PM »

BTW I typed test because I was having problems posting. It's not related to the post contents itself. Sorry for the confusion.