Ambrose reached out to Father Pfeiffer. Pablo did not find him, and neither did Father. The research on Ambrose's background was done before Ambrose was allowed to say Mass in September. They contacted the Eparchy in Toronto, and many other places, found eye witnesses, and more, and their information showed that the claims of Ambrose are accurate in three main points:

That Ambrose is Catholic, not Orthodox.
That he was was ordained.
That he was consecrated at least once. By eight bishops, who did this after the contentious consecration by Cardinal Slipjy, who also consecrated others during that time.

Those points are what we discussed today, after lunch.

Have you uploaded it yet? I've got my popcorn all ready for this bit of entertainment.  

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Ambrose reached out to Father Pfeiffer. Pablo did not find him, and neither did Father. The research on Ambrose's background was done before Ambrose was allowed to say Mass in September. They contacted the Eparchy in Toronto, and many other places, found eye witnesses, and more, and their information showed that the claims of Ambrose are accurate in three main points:

That Ambrose is Catholic, not Orthodox.
That he was was ordained.
That he was consecrated at least once. By eight bishops, who did this after the contentious consecration by Cardinal Slipjy, who also consecrated others during that time.

Those points are what we discussed today, after lunch.

Have you uploaded it yet? I've got my popcorn all ready for this bit of entertainment.  

Not yet, but I hope to do so tomorrow. Time is limited, and I have been busy. I will make time tomorrow. I am sorry for the delay, and I thank you for your patience.

Who are the two secret Bishops?

Drop us a quick line please.

Ambrose reached out to Father Pfeiffer. Pablo did not find him, and neither did Father. The research on Ambrose's background was done before Ambrose was allowed to say Mass in September. They contacted the Eparchy in Toronto, and many other places, found eye witnesses, and more, and their information showed that the claims of Ambrose are accurate in three main points:

That Ambrose is Catholic, not Orthodox.
That he was was ordained.
That he was consecrated at least once. By eight bishops, who did this after the contentious consecration by Cardinal Slipjy, who also consecrated others during that time.

Those points are what we discussed today, after lunch.

8 Bishops? at once? srsly? Were these Catholic or Orthodox (schismatic)?

Disneyland bishops as suggested by Fr C??

Ambrose reached out to Father Pfeiffer. Pablo did not find him, and neither did Father. The research on Ambrose's background was done before Ambrose was allowed to say Mass in September. They contacted the Eparchy in Toronto, and many other places, found eye witnesses, and more, and their information showed that the claims of Ambrose are accurate in three main points:

That Ambrose is Catholic, not Orthodox.
That he was was ordained.
That he was consecrated at least once. By eight bishops, who did this after the contentious consecration by Cardinal Slipjy, who also consecrated others during that time.

Those points are what we discussed today, after lunch.

Manuel, the above statement is confusing, at least to me. If Ambrose is Catholic, not Orthodox, then why the mountain of evidence, even from ecclesiamilitans.org that indicates that he was/is such? Also, what is the meaning of "he was consecrated at least once. By eight bishops, who did this after the contentious consecration by Cardinal Slipjy, who also consecrated others during that time." A valid consecration only requires that it be done once. Why by eight bishops? Does this mean Ambrose was repeatedly "consecrated" by various "bishops?"

I would be grateful for any clarification/explanation on this. Thank you in advance and God bless.

ManuelChavez believes everything Pablo says. No matter what he says. He is his Pope.
Dear Manuel Chavez if you do your prayers to get what you want or that a situation takes place, and it happen because God has listen to you. Who made it possible? Your prayers. And if a witch is making his job... moving mountains by bad forces... calling down to the Kentucky Resistance such a bishop.. who made it possible that this man comes? Who made it possible that this man had a privat conversation with Pablo in his headquarter? But no if it was witchcraft or not, Pablo is involved in this whole story. Believe what you want to believe. You are like a little child, without any blessing of Pablo you don't move and everything he says you believe. I pray for you and for your brother.

Manuel,

If Ambrose knows then the other two priests know.

Ask them at breakfast or lunch today, if you would.

Manuel,

The research on Ambrose's background was done before Ambrose was allowed to say Mass in September. They contacted the Eparchy in Toronto, and many other places, found eye witnesses, and more, and their information showed that the claims of Ambrose are accurate in three main points:

Hold on there, did not both Fathers in their sermons two weeks ago say that the investigation was ongoing and that he would be gone if they found out something in the negative?

And was this not after Ambrose had already been saying Mass? These two realities do not match.  If they are going to hold to this new narrative, they had better have the assistant pull those videos from you tube.