Author Topic: Thirty Days in the Boston Seminary (Read 95933 times)

OHCA · « **Reply #315 on:** November 09, 2015, 08:50:18 PM »

Quote from: Centroamerica

Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: TheRealMcCoy
You all do realize if the seminary gets 86ed the Chavez family loses their investment? The OLMC track record for ROIs is not real good.

And the investment I speak of is not just dollars.

What do you mean by "investment"?

The phrase "not just dollars" would imply a monetary investment. Not just dollas but also time, or not just dollars but also Euros. Not just dollars but also labor in the kitchen. In all of these "dollars" is included in the equation.

Pesos?

Matthew · « **Reply #316 on:** November 09, 2015, 09:44:40 PM »

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: Centroamerica
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: TheRealMcCoy
You all do realize if the seminary gets 86ed the Chavez family loses their investment? The OLMC track record for ROIs is not real good.

And the investment I speak of is not just dollars.

What do you mean by "investment"?

The phrase "not just dollars" would imply a monetary investment. Not just dollas but also time, or not just dollars but also Euros. Not just dollars but also labor in the kitchen. In all of these "dollars" is included in the equation.

Pesos?

Just FYI, in case you didn't realize it, the man behind the screen name "Manuel Chavez" is about as Hispanic as ...Mr. Rogers.

OHCA · « **Reply #317 on:** November 09, 2015, 10:17:30 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: Centroamerica
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: TheRealMcCoy
You all do realize if the seminary gets 86ed the Chavez family loses their investment? The OLMC track record for ROIs is not real good.

And the investment I speak of is not just dollars.

What do you mean by "investment"?

The phrase "not just dollars" would imply a monetary investment. Not just dollas but also time, or not just dollars but also Euros. Not just dollars but also labor in the kitchen. In all of these "dollars" is included in the equation.

Pesos?

Just FYI, in case you didn't realize it, the man behind the screen name "Manuel Chavez" is about as Hispanic as ...Mr. Rogers.

I wasn't sure about him. But I was thinking Pablo would enjoy getting pesos.

ManuelChavez · « **Reply #318 on:** November 10, 2015, 06:01:17 AM »

Quote from: Matthew

Quote from: OHCA
Quote from: Centroamerica
Quote from: ManuelChavez
Quote from: TheRealMcCoy
You all do realize if the seminary gets 86ed the Chavez family loses their investment? The OLMC track record for ROIs is not real good.

And the investment I speak of is not just dollars.

What do you mean by "investment"?

The phrase "not just dollars" would imply a monetary investment. Not just dollas but also time, or not just dollars but also Euros. Not just dollars but also labor in the kitchen. In all of these "dollars" is included in the equation.

Pesos?

Just FYI, in case you didn't realize it, the man behind the screen name "Manuel Chavez" is about as Hispanic as ...Mr. Rogers.

I am half Mexican, from my mother's side. I am also a bunch of other nationalities, which could make me a mutt of sorts, but Mexican is a strong part of my ethnic origins.

cebu · « **Reply #319 on:** November 10, 2015, 06:16:34 AM »

I have just managed to listen to the recording posted on the 30 Days in Boston. In between the snorting of Fr Pfeiffer (why does he do that ?), i was shocked that he clearly believes Mr Moran to be a totally valid priest and bishop. He even attacks Tony La Rosa by name for exposing the truth about this fake.

As a typical meglomaniac Father says that people are only attacking him because they want the 'seminary' closed down. He is even so deluded to say that they are continuing the work of Archbishop Lefebvre. I am sure the saintly Archbishop will be turning in his grave at that. Abp Lefebvre would not touch that cult with his crozier except to exorcise it if both the priests came to their senses and get rid of Paul Hernandez.

Croixalist · « **Reply #320 on:** November 10, 2015, 06:32:26 AM »

Quote from: cebu

I have just managed to listen to the recording posted on the 30 Days in Boston. In between the snorting of Fr Pfeiffer (why does he do that ?), i was shocked that he clearly believes Mr Moran to be a totally valid priest and bishop. He even attacks Tony La Rosa by name for exposing the truth about this fake.

As a typical meglomaniac Father says that people are only attacking him because they want the 'seminary' closed down. He is even so deluded to say that they are continuing the work of Archbishop Lefebvre. I am sure the saintly Archbishop will be turning in his grave at that. Abp Lefebvre would not touch that cult with his crozier except to exorcise it if both the priests came to their senses and get rid of Paul Hernandez.

Both Hewko and Pfeiffer are infinitely worse than Pablo at this point. Nothing the Mexican could possibly do would be on the same level as a priest permitting sacrilege on the scale that these two have. They deserve to be defrocked for this.

Recusant Sede · « **Reply #321 on:** November 10, 2015, 08:13:53 AM »

This does not look good at all.

Croixalist · « **Reply #322 on:** November 10, 2015, 08:35:28 AM »

On his seventeenth day at Boston, Manuel did send to me...

Seventeen sordid scandals,
Sixteen shortchanged students,
Fifteen fractious confreres,
Fourteen faked photo albums,
Thirteen thwarted theories,
Twelve devils delving,
Eleven Pablos preaching,
Ten leaps of logic,
Nine loan sharks leering,
Eight minds a-melting,
Seven shills a-shilling,
Six priests vacating,
Five folding chairs!
Four scolding words,
Three henchmen,
Two troubled tweets,
and a Pfeiffer in a fig tree!

stgobnait · « **Reply #323 on:** November 10, 2015, 08:36:18 AM »

Understatement.

cathman7 · « **Reply #324 on:** November 10, 2015, 09:30:55 AM »

At the roughly 26:30 mark Fr. Pfeiffer says that Ambrose was never part of the Orthodox church. Yet he went on to explain before that Ambrose was for many years part of various Orthodox groups. Bizarre....

cathman7 · « **Reply #325 on:** November 10, 2015, 09:37:54 AM »

The talk makes my head spin. None of it changes the fact that Fr. Pfeiffer lacked great discernment in even bringing Ambrose to his seminary.

Matthew · « **Reply #326 on:** November 10, 2015, 09:46:00 AM »

For those who want to listen to Fr. Pfeiffer's recent 1 hour 45 minute conference on Ambrose for the seminarians, I have it here:

http://www.cathinfo.com/Fr-Pfeiffer-Ambrose.mp3

I made it much louder, and compressed it into a roughly 100 megabyte MP3 file.

I could have made it even smaller if I was willing to endure some distortion (you know, the whole "sounds like he's underwater" effect). But I went with 128 Kbps, which is plenty of bandwidth for speech.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #327 on:** November 10, 2015, 09:49:47 AM »

Thanks Matthew!

I was just gonna post about this. I haven't looked at his site for a few days so I didn't know about this dropbox conversation. Thankfully somebody uploaded it. I'm gonna listen to it now.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #328 on:** November 10, 2015, 09:56:47 AM »

Quote from: cebu

I have just managed to listen to the recording posted on the 30 Days in Boston. In between the snorting of Fr Pfeiffer (why does he do that ?), i was shocked that he clearly believes Mr Moran to be a totally valid priest and bishop. He even attacks Tony La Rosa by name for exposing the truth about this fake.

As a typical meglomaniac Father says that people are only attacking him because they want the 'seminary' closed down. He is even so deluded to say that they are continuing the work of Archbishop Lefebvre. I am sure the saintly Archbishop will be turning in his grave at that. Abp Lefebvre would not touch that cult with his crozier except to exorcise it if both the priests came to their senses and get rid of Paul Hernandez.

I noticed the snorting that he does a few years ago. I have met someone with a mild form of tourettes that frequently did this. It was different, but resembled this that he is doing. The symptoms are worse when the person is not speaking. This would explain the relief he gets in being long-winded.

ultrarigorist · « **Reply #329 on:** November 10, 2015, 10:05:35 AM »

Just as well Fr. Pfeiffer's discussion is posted here, because Manuel already flushed his down the memory hole! That's journalism at it's absolute worst Manuel..

Fr. claims it's indisputable that Moran is a priest and bishop, and 4 days later they ditched him. What exactly is OLMC's "truth"?

It's very interesting. Fr Pfeiffer says Tony Larosa(?) confirmed the fraudster's incardination in Toronto, but if I recall correct, Tony was the one who got docuмented confirmation from the Toronto Eparchy that "Archbishop" Moran's claim is fraudulent, he was never incardinated in Toronto.
It's also interesting how fast Fr. dismissed the claims of Papal Privilege and Universal Jurisdiction when a questioner brought them up. Obviously Fr. was already picking and choosing from Billy Moran's Buffet of Baloney. He sure wasn't swallowing all of it, even himself!!!