:dancing-banana: :roll-laugh1:FYI- l spoke with Fr. Pfeiffer a few days ago. He showed no signs of demonic possession! Exactly who made this accusation, when and where, to whom? It sounds like a remark made in jest. Hope I'm right.
Like I said: Fr. LeRoux, Fellay, Rostand and others make the remarks regularly, and in no jest:
I keep hearing French SSPX priests accusing anyone that disagrees with them of being "possessed by the devil" or "it is from the Devil". The French Neo-SSPX priests like Fellay, Rostand, LeRoux and others are constantly using the phrases to describe the resistance people.
Is this something common in the French language?
( In the English language it sounds moronic. It is actually moronic, for that sword cuts both ways, and so it could be that it is they who are possessed by the devil.)
This is an interesting turn of events. I would append "..if true," but I don't doubt you, bowler. I just have not heard it myself, even while I can quite easily imagine them saying these things.
If you could provide some quotes from reliable sources that would help. Otherwise, are you talking about what you or others have heard spoken, but not what they have seen written? I suspect this is the case, as the Menzingen-denizens are generally careful not to put into writing things that can come back to them in the future. This is what makes the AFD of 2012, and the Six Conditions of the General Chapter of 2012, and the recorded and quoted interview of CNS where +F said 95% of Vat.II is acceptable -- things that stand out, because they can be identified and the
Menz-denzs can't deny them.
One of their favorite obfuscating canards is saying you shouldn't believe INTERNET RUMOUR, even while they have NEVER PROVIDED ANY EXAMPLES OF WHAT THEY MEAN BY "INTERNET RUMOUR." (Cf. TheRecusant in several editions over the past year)
.