Here's is an article about Resistance priest Fr. "P" in Bordeaux, France from an abuse victim's website:
Abbot P.: A predator in freedom for nearly 30 years?
In a letter of July 2002 to Bishop Fellay, Abbot P. (censured by the FSSPX) himself acknowledges facts of morals dating back at least 1986. The SSPX has a good time to clear himself by saying that he Is no longer in its ranks but it was until the summer of 2014 and left of its own free will, without ever being excluded. This, though, for almost 30 years, many credible accusations of pedophilia have been made against him. In other words, the passivity of the SSPX superiors towards this individual raises many questions.
Active in the youth movements even before his priestly ordination, the Abbot P. (mention censured by the FSSPX) is not difficult to track: as in a Scout game, it is enough to follow his track, There is a principle of presumption of innocence, but when an individual is accused of the facts of the crime, The same type in many places, by people who do not know each other, and over many years, suspicions become very heavy. In such a case, every superior who is somewhat responsible, opens an in-depth investigation and, as a precaution, excludes the person concerned from any ministry with children. That this was not the case is all the more difficult to explain because, as we said above, Father P. (censured by the SSPX) had already confessed to the abbot the facts of pedophilia Schmidberger (Superior General of 1982-1994).
What, then, is gross negligence or complicity? In any case, the attitude of the hierarchy of the SSPX is simply scandalous. Abbot Aulagnier, then superior of the district of France, left Abbot P. (censured by the FSSPX) to take office in 1993 in Conflans-Pontoise and to take care of the youth movements when he was informed of Several pedophilia complaints. He described the mother as one of the "old crazy" victims. It must be said that the abbot P. (mention censured by the SSPX) is one of his great friends. Or how to cover "buddies" even in very serious cases. In his general superiorate (1982-1994), he used a denunciation of the most virulent terms to forbid ad vitam to the Abbot P. (censured by the SSPX) Continue to exercise an apostolate in youth movements ... to lift his own ban a few weeks later! How will Father Schmidberger explain this surrender to young people who complained about acts of pedophilia on the part of Abbe P. (censured by the SSPX)?
As for Bishop Fellay, it is even worse: he scuttled the only serious attempt to block the way for this individual. Abbé Laurençon, superior of the FSSPX district of France from 1996 to 2002, had also considered credible accusations of sɛҳuąƖ abuse of minors against Abbot P. (mention censured by the FSSPX) . He therefore decided to forbid him to any apostolate with young people. Abbot P. (censured by the FSSPX) complained to Menzingen ... and Bishop Fellay broke the decision of the superior of France. Since Abbe P. (censured by the SSPX) had already made a confession of pedophile facts to the Generalate, the conclusion is necessary: Bishop Fellay deliberately put at risk dozens of young people. Imagine that between the first written complaint concerning the continuation of the scouting activities of Abbe P. (censured by the SSPX) in Conflans and its effective "setting-up" in 2002, Five years ... It was time, a good fifteen years after the first known facts of the SSPX, that Abbe P. (censured by the SSPX) had confessed! Let us not forget that the Abbe P. (censured by the SSPX) was stationed at Mantes-la-Jolie at the time of the Perros-Guirec affair; That he was alone in dealing with the Scouts of Conflans-Ste-Honorine while his brother Cottard was in prison. We do not dare to imagine what will have happened during this time ... And all this, let us repeat it, while Bishop Fellay was aware of the "activities" of the Abbe P. (censured by the SSPX). It's amazing!
After all this, it is shameful that it is the mother of a victim who must react in May 1997 to finally take care of removing the burden of the youth movements to the abbot P. (mention censured by the SSPX ). Viviane Lambert was shocked when she learned that the Abbe P. (censored by the FSSPX) was still ministering to the Charles de Foucauld group and elsewhere in France. It must be said that the abbots Cottard and Camper, priors of Abbe P. (censured by the FSSPX) in Conflans-Pontoise, had not been informed of anything about his past. Other voices were also raised and the Abbot Laurençon finally issued a ban in 2000, broken as we said by Bishop Fellay. In 2002, shortly before Abbé de Cacqueray was handed over to Abbé de Cacqueray, the prohibition was confirmed and Father P. (censored by the FSSPX) was transferred. He initially had to be sent "in penance" to the Carmel of Eynesse but having understood that Menzingen was sensitive to his jeremiades he got to go to the nuns of Ruffec instead. We can get an idea of the seriousness of the application of the prohibition measures by simply visiting the site of Juventas Christi. It shows that he is a chaplain, organizes pilgrimages of young people, poses on the photos and signs chronicles in the newspaper of the association and that years after the alleged final ban of 2002. He was even Granted a sabbatical year in 2005-2006. This was exactly what the "very strict measures" referred to by Abbe Niklaus Pfluger were to a victim of Father P. (censured by the SSPX).
Bishop Fellay may try to clear himself by arguing that Abbot P. (censured by the SSPX) is no longer in the SSPX. Indeed, he left in 2014 but of his own free will. Bishop Fellay never excluded him and he only sued him canonically in 2012, and only after a complaint from a former victim in the Vatican. All in all, Abbot P. (censored by the FSSPX) was able to exercise his "activities" within the SSPX during ... 26 years before being really worried!
At present, Father P. (censured by the SSPX) is a "priest friend" * of "La Résistance" (vagus and not a member of anything: this formula offers much more freedom and is naturally sɛҳuąƖ pervers) and is protected by the abbot François Pivert, who refuses to listen to the slightest accusation against him. It will be noted that the oppositions between "La Résistance" and Bishop Fellay do not change anything in terms of pedophilia: it is in reality the "clan" reflexes that are decisive, each defending its tooth and nail its structure of power, its "box". In this power game, victims of pedophiles are victims again. In this field, the traditionalist world is hardly different from dioceses, congregations and communities, where the interests and "reputation" of each "chapel" often take precedence over justice and care for the victims. Traditionalists, who believe themselves to be very different from the "modernists," are, in fact, desperately like them. The purpose of this site is precisely to emphasize the importance of denouncing all negligences and complicities, all "chapels" combined, and to prioritize victims on the pharisaical interests of all currents and organizations.
Let us conclude this file P. (censured by the SSPX) with what is perhaps the most revolting: if Bishop Fellay opened a canonical trial against this priest very late in 2012, it is only because a victim, exasperated Of Menzingen's half-measures, complained to the section of "gravioribus delictis" of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Under pressure from Rome, Bishop Fellay was forced to act. In other words, the Superior General FSSPX does the housework only when he is constrained and forced. And as opportunism is always good to take, he then offers himself a pirouette: with the airs of "Mr. Clean", he judges an inferior whose complicity he facilitated his sinister work for years. Let us be sure that the newly instituted canonical court to judge guilty bishops or accomplices of pedophilia will soon have a new case to deal with.
* This page of the site cristiadatradicinalista.blogspot.com is no longer available for registered users only (are there things to hide?) But we have made a screenshot
Topic: The video everyone here should watch (Read 6226 times)