[SeanJohnson]

I’d assume their view is the same as Fr. Albert’s
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiFkc_hs-3lAhVEj1kKHUPhDIkQtwIwAHoECAkQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D11NcXdacM18&usg=AOvVaw3fxT28WEkreng8FrzWbXxP
I brought up Fr. Gleize because the Resustance argues that any SSPX priest who opposes agreement with Rome is either silenced or kicked out. If that’s true, why is Fr. Gleize still Professor of ecclesiology at Econe? I mean heck, he’s the one they sent out to talk to Rome in 2012.

Was it your intention to derail your own thread (ie., make your announcement about the apostate “Dominicans,” then quickly divert the thread so that criticism is avoided, while the announcement and link stand unmolested)?

[Banezian]

Was it your intention to derail your own thread (ie., make your announcement about the apostate “Dominicans,” then quickly divert the thread so that criticism is avoided, while the announcement and link stand unmolested)?

I answered your criticism. There have been threads on the subject before, so I wanted to update the forum on the situation. You will answer to God for hurling charges of apostasy at priests you probably don’t even know

[SeanJohnson]

I answered your criticism. There have been threads on the subject before, so I wanted to update the forum on the situation. You will answer to God for hurling charges of apostasy at priests you probably don’t even know

Au contraire:

The charge of apostasy is made by their legitimate superiors in Avrillé (multiple times) in the Steffeshausen Memmorandum.

They have no right to even wear the Dominican habit, much less submitting their obedience to the SSPX.

This situation would have horrified Lefebvre, but not an SSPX who contrived for many, many years to break Avrillé (ever since it announced back in 2001 that it would not follow the SSPX into liberal doctrinal pluralism).

[Banezian]

Au contraire:

The charge of apostasy is made by their legitimate superiors in Avrillé (multiple times) in the Steffeshausen Memmorandum.

They have no right to even wear the Dominican habit, much less submitting their obedience to the SSPX.

This situation would have horrified Lefebvre, but not an SSPX who contrived for many, many years to break Avrillé (ever since it announced back in 2001 that it would not follow the SSPX into liberal doctrinal pluralism).

Believe what you want to old boy

[SeanJohnson]

Believe what you want to old boy

Do you dispute the notion that Lefebvre rejected the idea of the exempt religious orders submitting to him, or of him taking control of them?