[SeanJohnson]

Anyone who has read my book is well informed about these fake “Dominicans.”

[Meg]

Fr. Gleize regularly opposes agreement with Rome in his articles and he’s still at Econe

Okay, but that's not what I asked about. I asked about Fr. Raymond and Fr. Thomas. Are they fine with the collaboration between the SSPX and conciliar dioceses around the world? Are they fine with the SSPX reconciling with Rome by littles?

[SeanJohnson]

Okay, but that's not what I asked about. I asked about Fr. Raymond and Fr. Thomas. Are they fine with the collaboration between the SSPX and conciliar dioceses around the world? Are they fine with the SSPX reconciling with Rome by littles?

I presume this is a rhetorical challenge to the OP, but the answer is an obvious and resounding “YES!”

[Meg]

I presume this is a rhetorical challenge to the OP, but the answer is an obvious and resounding “YES!”

I don't know much about them, but if they are fine with the SSPX reconciling with Rome, and they are fine with the SSPX collaborating with the conciliar dioceses, then they are not faithful to legacy and work Archbishop Lefebvre. They may have good intentions. But eventually, they will be conciliar Dominicans. And you know what that means. 

[Banezian]

Okay, but that's not what I asked about. I asked about Fr. Raymond and Fr. Thomas. Are they fine with the collaboration between the SSPX and conciliar dioceses around the world? Are they fine with the SSPX reconciling with Rome by littles?

I’d assume their view is the same as Fr. Albert’s
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwiFkc_hs-3lAhVEj1kKHUPhDIkQtwIwAHoECAkQAQ&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3D11NcXdacM18&usg=AOvVaw3fxT28WEkreng8FrzWbXxP
I brought up Fr. Gleize because the Resustance argues that any SSPX priest who opposes agreement with Rome is either silenced or kicked out. If that’s true, why is Fr. Gleize still Professor of ecclesiology at Econe? I mean heck, he’s the one they sent out to talk to Rome in 2012.