Author Topic: The Seer Responds to Bishop Fellay (Read 19301 times)

Centroamerica · « **Reply #10 on:** November 04, 2015, 03:20:07 PM »

Quote from: Matthew

Hollingsworth has been banned for that little outburst (and the other one earlier today).

Combine that with his starting to "rib" me publicly like we're old friends a few days ago -- I was cutting him some slack there, for the sake of his long membership here. I know that everyone can have a bad day once in a while.

Apparently this crisis is starting to get to him. I'm sure emotions are running high, especially frustration, among many Catholics involved.

I PMed him yesterday about one of his posts I had to moderate, giving him a decently long explanation. In other words, "I tried".

Yikes, I must be somewhere on that list.

Colombiere · « **Reply #11 on:** November 04, 2015, 04:53:18 PM »

The best thing is to have so many rosary crusades as possible and to do them all in reparation for the sins committed against the Immaculate Heart and for all of the intentions of the Immaculate Heart. That way the intentions are always right. I like to be surprised!

curioustrad · « **Reply #12 on:** November 04, 2015, 05:27:02 PM »

I found the original link went to the "Non Possumus" website. I saw that that it was posted September 15 over there (at least that is what I think it says at the end of the entry).

I'm just musing aloud here but one question springs to mind: is there a connection between + Faure's visit and the sudden reappearance of Mrs Anderson?

I also was particularly taken with the claim that her spiritual director was moderating her for 9 years before and during all the events to which she alludes. Thus, I am wondering why it might take a spiritual director that long to determine the credibility or otherwise of alleged apparitions?

Clearly from the Menzingen letter + Fellay has nixed her but then + Williamson does not - here something more is going on than meets the eye.... probably not just ill will between them (this is an important point not to be overlooked - please notice in all the time that has elapsed, + Williamson has not publicly commented so far).

Oddly an SSPX priest who is famous in these USA confirmed to me privately the truth that Mrs A. had been to see + Fellay once but I am astounded at the claim of multiple visits - here I must admit a sense of confusion - why the claim of multiple visits and the admission of only one?

Finally, why does Mrs. A. wait 10 months to issue a public letter in reply to one that was only private and clearly addressed as an internal matter to the SSPX priests (of which her spiritual director was / is one).

With these facts in place... more realistic comments (i.e. ad rem) are invited...

richard · « **Reply #13 on:** November 04, 2015, 05:54:31 PM »

Quote from: covet truth

Quote from: hollingsworth
I believe this woman, Mrs. Anderson.

So do I.

So do I.

Centroamerica · « **Reply #14 on:** November 04, 2015, 06:13:25 PM »

Quote from: richard

Quote from: covet truth
Quote from: hollingsworth
I believe this woman, Mrs. Anderson.

So do I.

So do I.

I haven't given a lot of thought to the matter, but I think her claims are credible. I am unsure if she is saying that this is a set of apparitions or some sort of vision in a dream that is of divine origin. I don't know her story enough, but I don't discredit it automatically.