.
Oh ... OH! This reminds me. I was at a gathering with friends, and
I said, in the process of the discussion,
"The nαzι h0Ɩ0cαųst is
the dogma outside of which there is no
salvation!"
My friend, Charles, said, with a long and serious face, "You debase
the nαzι h0Ɩ0cαųst when you commercialize it!"
I replied, "Well then, what we should do is RAISE IT UP to a higher
level!" I raised my hands like I was lifting up a beach ball. Charles
nodded and smiled.
Then my other friend chimed in, "What do the Hollywood elite say
when they're in Israel? They say, 'There's no business like Shoah
business'!"
We had a good time with this.
At first glance I would say that he would not answer you, but then, all he really has to do is quote theologians and representatives of the Vatican who have said this, or something close to it. We live in the age where heretics can defer to papal pronouncements in order to defend their heresy.
Many of the Fellayites on IA showed that they are modernists on the issue of the Jєωιѕн covenant. Complete sellouts and frauds.
I've yet to encounter one Fellayite who isn't soft on the Jews.
N.B. -- My friends are not Accordistas.. We would never have had fun then!
And it's curious you'd mention this, SSS, because I've had the same
experience. It is always (so far) the question of the Jews, or, one could
almost say, "THE Jєωιѕн QUESTION," upon which the conversation turns.
We can be getting along fine regarding some nuance of Moral Theology,
for example, but the moment the discussion touches on the Jєωιѕн Question,
they turn against me, and the tension rises fast.
It's quite a phenomenon, and they are all (so far) prone to take sides
with +Fellay and his agenda of aggiornamento with apostate Rome.