The Secular Re-Branding of the Society

It was recently revealed by pro-Resistance priest Fr. Girourd that Menzingen hired a secular “PR firm” several years ago, which specializes in “branding” companies. The reason behind this “PR firm” was to attempt to change the outlook of the Society and make it more popular amongst the masses. This was revealed to Fr. Girourd by Neo-SSPX priest Fr. Wegner, who was even fond of these liberal changes to the Society.

This secular PR firm explains why we’ve witnessed changes in the Society’s Angelus Press, Regina Caeli Report, and in their entire outward appearance. It all ties in with Maximilian Krah and GREC as to why these changes are occurring. Secularism has overtaken the SSPX. And the corruption goes all the way to the top.

The pro-Fellay crowd dismisses this as no big deal, something that doesn’t negatively affect the Society. However, it really is a big deal. This is an absolute bombshell, and is the biggest news since the leaking of the Doctrinal Preamble. Allow me to explain why.

The motive behind the hiring of this PR firm is to make the SSPX “more popular”. Think of it as a secular corporation trying to make its brand more appealing to a wider audience. What I am left wondering is, why the heck does the SSPX care what the modern world thinks of them? The modern world is anti-Christian, so we shouldn’t strive to be granted their seal of approval. I actually fear for anyone that the modern world does approve of, because it means they are doing something wrong. You cannot serve two masters, it is simply impossible to please both the satanic secular world and to please God at the same time. You are either friends with the secular world and an enemy of Christ, or you oppose the secular world and choose Christ as your King. The SSPX is trying to have it both ways, which is not possible. Archbishop Lefebvre wouldn’t have tried to make the Society more appealing to the world, so why is Bishop Fellay trying it? It is not only a betrayal of the mission of the Archbishop, it is a betrayal of Christ and His Catholic Church.

I discovered a few days ago that the Society’s US District Website has a new look. When I first looked at it, I found the site to be modern and ugly.. After the news of the PR firm was released, the new look of their website began to make more sense. Everything about the Society today is more modern. Not only do their sites all have a more modern look, but their very positions have now become modern. Softness on Jєωs, softness towards modernist Rome, softness towards Vatican II and the New Mass, etc. These new positions are all modern and all appeal to a wider crowd.

In a recent Asian conference, Bishop Williamson dropped another bombshell. He revealed that the Society’s France District Superior, Fr. de Cacqueray, was ordered by Menzingen to punish a priest who wrote a book, the contents of which are 90% quotes from Archbishop Lefebvre. Fr. de Cacqueray, who has previously shown that he isn’t even a friend of the Resistance, refused to punish this priest and has allowed the book to remain in SSPX chapels. This is great news. Combined with the letter from the 37 anonymous French SSPX priests earlier this year, it seems that the SSPXers in France are starting to wake to what is going on. If Bishop Fellay loses support from France, then the momentum would begin to tremendously shift towards the Resistance. It will be interesting to watch what happens to Fr. de Cacqueray next after refusing to punish the priest who wrote the book.

This is not the first time that Bishop Fellay has forbidden a book to be circulated within the Society. He once banned a book (I can’t recall who wrote it) that was written to refute atheism because it was “too extreme”.

It is yet another example of how the Society is desperately attempting to appeal to a wider crowd. Apparently, they are so desperate that they’re willing to shun their own founder and his words in order to gain more approval. It is truly sickening. Let us keep Fr. de Cacqueray and the author of that book, Fr. Pivert, in our prayers.

In the meantime, let us continue to shout the truth from the mountain tops. We should be arming ourselves with the truth often, by listening to the sermons and conferences of the Resistance priests (especially those of Fr. Hewko and Fr. Pfeiffer), and of course, the ones given by Bishop Williamson. When it appeared that the Resistance may be losing momentum, they came back swinging with these two incredible announcements. Bishop Fellay must be squirming in his seat trying to figure out how he’s going to explain these things away.

What it shows is that Bishop Fellay is a traitor; a traitor of the mission of Archbishop Lefebvre and traitor of Catholic Tradition. He has proven beyond doubt that his mind is infected with liberalism, as he desires the approval of the secular world and the approval of God. He is trying to have the best of both worlds. Again, however, one cannot serve two masters. May God Bless the Holy Resistance for their work in exposing +Fellay’s Neo-SSPX for what it is.

God Bless.

http://traditionalcatholicremnant.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/the-secular-re-branding-of-the-society/

How much longer will anyone still tow the Menzingen party-line? I don't know...but pride infects people...The people who were defending Bp Fellay for the past yr are going to have a hard time admitting they were wrong.. Yes, even after the AFD...the re-branding of the No longer SPX...Fellay's lawyer is a Mossad connected zionist Jєω....Yeah, just mention that on angelqueen and that only proves to the neo-con "catholics" that you're "anti-Jєωιѕн...incredible..you become the center of their attention, NOT the zionist Jєω...Expelling and persecuting good priests for telling the truth....Oh, he's got to go..

But it's okay for ExSPX priests to lie, so long as they're repeating
the lies of the SG.  

Therefore, it is preferred for ExSPX priests to lie than to tell the truth.

"What?"

It is preferred for ExSPX priests to lie than to tell the truth.  

"Oh.  That's what I thought you said."

I think people started calling Krah a Jєω because they suspected that he was a Jєωιѕн infiltrator.

I agree with you, Raphaela (I like your username, by the way), that because we have no proof that he is, it is not necessary to label him a Jєω. Nevertheless, he is certainly a liberal Judaizer (meaning someone who kisses up to Jєωs).

I remember when it first came up on this site - someone said "Is K r a h  a Jєωιѕн name?" The answer is no - he comes from an East German Catholic family - but the rumour still spread all over the place.

Which rumour? I recall a Veritas1961 using Cardinal Lustiger as an example and Krah never denied being Jєωιѕн.

Could you cite who called Max a Jєω?

Should I appear in court  all is prepared and it would be a very memorable day out.There will be some comedy in it.  

I remember when it first came up on this site

It didn't last long on AQ or IA and good people were mocked.

In the past two years, we've heard knowledgeable input from our German CI members who state that "Krah" is not a German surname ?

Rather, "Krah" is more typical of a made-up name which the Jєωs are notorious for.

A few minutes googling shows that K r a h  is a fairly widespread German surname, with plenty of Catholic Christian names. Xaver K, Therese K, even a Bernadette K. It may be dialect, but not "made-up" and doesn't seem to be Jєωιѕн. Perhaps what sounds odd in one part of Germany is common in another.  

If you insist on not referring to Maxie as a Jєω, because of implied racial malice, then I must insist on calling him a Zionist, which is must worse and cannot be denied.

"If I insist" - "implied racial malice" - This language is what I mean by using propaganda. Instead of "Is it true or is it not true?" We have no evidence that it is.

Also - if the K r a h family had even a small Jєωιѕн connection, it would have been pointed out to them in the Third Reich, and no doubt we would have heard about it on M K's own blog

here

Useful ammunition against Bishop Williamson!

But no mention.

If you're trying to get a kosher brand for what you claim is the salt of the earth, then the salt has lost its savor.