It's really a summary of why the Resistance must exist and be supported.

In the SSPX chapels, various evils are called "good", while countless goods are called "evil".

I hold that it doesn't get any more fundamentally screwed up than calling good "evil" and evil "good". Once a person/chapel/organization/nation embraces that behavior, ANYTHING IS POSSIBLE eventually, even blasphemy, child sacrifice (abortion?) and devil worship. All sins are fundamentally lies, or exaggerating minor goods and downplaying/ignoring great evils -- such as offending God. Calling self or concupiscence "good" and God "something bad".

Examples of this in the SSPX are too numerous to mention.

My premise: a valid Mass is heavily tainted when it comes with this fundamental poison as an add-on. What good is having access to confession, if you are trained to call evil "good" and good "evil"? Once a person has thus violated Truth, one's confessions will eventually become invalid anyhow -- a valid priest is only part of the equation for making a good (or valid) confession. The same with Holy Communion -- what good is receiving Our Lord every Sunday if one has no love for goodness or the Truth? Eventually such a person will fall into mortal sin anyway, and then such weekly Communions will become sacrilegious -- tickets to Hell instead of Heaven.

Traditional Catholic parents concerned about their sons, or the friends of their sons, engaging in consensual sodomy at Immaculate Conception Academy in Post Falls, ID are called "evil" and vilified.
https://www.cathinfo.com/sspx-resistance-news/sodomy-scandal-in-post-falls-id-sspx-immaculate-conception-academy/

Priests holding fast to Tradition, to what they were taught in the Seminary, to the wisdom of Archbishop Lefebvre, are called "evil", while those who have grown closer to the world and Vatican II are called "good".

Bishop Williamson who is the most faithful successor of Abp. Lefebvre (some Trads, especially some sedevacantists, might criticize him -- but we're talking about SSPX-attending Catholics here. They claim to revere Abp. Lefebvre!) is called evil.

Bishop Fellay, who secretly attempted to transform the SSPX into "FSSP part 2" and embraced Freemasonic tactics all-around, is called "good".

Brave priests full of Fortitude, faithful to what they were taught, and truth-tellers are called evil, while cowardly priests who "keep their head down" are called good.

Public consecration of bishops for the assured continuation of Tradition, without attempting to confer jurisdiction -- in short, exactly the same situation as +ABL's consecrations in 1988 -- is called "evil" just because those bishops support the Resistance. I'm speaking of the consecration of Bishops Faure, Thomas Aquinas, and Zendejas.

Modernist, Conciliar bishops are called "good" and get red carpet treatment, while Bishops Williamson and Zendejas (in particular) are called "evil" and are actively persecuted by SSPX clergy -- even when such persecution causes actual damage to Traditional Catholic souls. Preventing the opening of a retreat center, for example. The SSPX's hatred for these good prelates is so consuming, that they don't even care about the welfare of Traditional Catholic souls anymore. Their PRIMARY and MAIN concern is the bottom line of SSPX, Inc. -- its power and wealth.

Based on their actions, which can't be denied, I can conclude that the superiors in the SSPX would rather have $200 million in yearly income and 4000 souls enter heaven, than $199 million in yearly income and 4200 souls enter heaven. They aren't content with souls being saved outside SSPX, Inc. They would rather have 1 more parishioner than allow "someone else" to save the souls of 10 or 15 parishioners. They are completely selfish. That is not a Christ-like attitude.

For example: it is EVIL to try to αssαssιnαtҽ a priest. It's MORE EVIL to go ahead and attempt assassination of a priest, even if 100 innocent traditional Catholics will certainly die in the attempt.

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE?

The SSPX isn't my hope -- much less my Messiah or my God. The SSPX might own hundreds of millions of dollars in real estate, but they do not own the Kingdom of Heaven.

There is most certainly salvation outside the SSPX. The strange thing is, many SSPX priests and laity seem to act and speak as if they disagree with that statement. They certainly think they have a monopoly on Tradition. They have more tolerance for the Conciliar Church than they do for "other Trad groups" not affiliated with them.

Very good ecclesiological points. Alas the problem of Mammon when it comes to the the Society of Bishop Saruman, er , Fellay of many colours.
It is easier for a camel to learn to play Beethoven's violin concerto op 61 than it is for a rich prelate to even grace the Gates of Heaven.

I avail myself of sacramental home visits by an SSPX priest as chronic illness prevents regular attendance.I happen to know the priest before he was ordained and he appears to be rock solid, thus far.  It helps to have this between my visits to the nearest Resistance parish, that being of  Father Girouard (one hour by jet plus to and from airports). Deo gratias for cheap flights.

Kazimierz,

Since you attend Fr. Girouard's chapel on occasion, what is the best way to try to find out where the chapel is located, and when Mass is offered? Should I write to Father at his P.O. box? I think it's provided here on the forum. That's probably the best way. 

The SSPX chapel that I attend doesn't have any of the usual problems, that I know of, at this time, since it's a mission chapel with no resident priests. But just in case, I'd like to try to attend Fr. Girouard's chapel once a month or so, since it's two hour drive from where I live (I had thought it was a lot farther). I just have to go over the U.S./Canadian border to get there. 

Father prefers that you mail him first. He will provide you with the information you seek. :)

Thanks. I'll do that.  :)

Matthew:
In other words, they need to follow the advice of H.E., who has been saying essentially the same thing since he was ejected from the Society.  I could not agree more.

Heck, he was saying this ... much more subtly ... about 30 years ago, well before all this transpired.  He was always opposed to the notion that the SSPX had some kind of monopoly on Tradition as if it were synonymous with the Church herself.

Lad:
Well, Ok, I concede the point.  However, I don't think that +W was telling folks how essentially corrupt the Society is 30 years ago.

Not exactly.  But he was rather prophetic in hinting that the SSPX would disintegrate after the death of +Lefebvre.  Absent an actual Church authority and then having lost the undisputed moral leadership of a +Lefebvre, he was all but certain that the SSPX would eventually break up.

Yes, I can recall a sermon where BW told us in his inimitable style ' You know the wheels can come off the SSPX wagon' never a truer word spoken....