I hope the Resistance resists the temptation to attack Pope Pius XII or the Holy Laws of the Catholic Church as promulgated by him.
Agreed.
Most of what was accomplished under his nose was done by deception, rather than promotion.
He was also quite ill for the last several years, and therefore easy to take advantage of . . . He was taken advantage of.
You do realize, my good man, that this is the same line of bull-hoax they give about "Saint JPII."
YUK!
JPII's modernist writings are abundant, and span his entire career.
Pius XII has no modernist writings to support the contention he was a closet modernist, and intended to be a transitional pope.
Additionally, the biggest proof of his unquestionable orthodoxy was his refusal to call a Council, despite repeated pressure to do so by the modernists surrounding him (Bea, Antonelli, Montini, etc).
Yet, this would have been the easiest way for him to accomplish any secret modernist agenda.......just like his successors did.
As an aside, to continue down the path you are suggesting is a rabbit hole that leads all the way back to Peter:
1) Pius XII allowed an experimental breviary and revised the Holy Week, so we have to reject him as a modernist;
2) St. Pius X lowered the age for first communion, and endorsed frequent reception of communion (in addition to chopping down the Leonine Briviary), so we have to reject him as a modernist;
3) Leo XIII promulgated Rerum Novarum, and therefore (so they unjustly say), we have to reject him as being influenced by Marxism, and laying the groundwork for liberation theology.
4) and on and on and on....