.
This is a great Supplement!
TrueTrad.com has gone to great lengths for our edification and assistance, for those that is, who have eyes to see and ears to hear. Unfortunately, there will be those who remain impudently and culpably ignorant by way of just not wanting to know.
I find it ironic that the same "dialogue with the deaf" that ABL lamented is now going on between the XSPX and the Resistance to their errors. It is most ironic. But it goes to show how dangerous Modernism is, and this is why Pope St. Pius X warned that it would be the destroyer of all religion. We should take heed!
P 1- 3 ~ Demonstration of the overall principle that PRUDENCE is misunderstood
in Fr. Themann's presentation, and while this fact invalidates the entire work,
nonetheless, the rest of it will be assessed anyway for the benefit of the readers
(like me!).
"...your conference was completely inadequate as an explanation of the SSPX’s
recent conduct. However, we regret that this fact does not end the errors you
made during the conference nor the harm you are doing."
P 8 ~ +Fellay is still open to a 'deal' with unconverted Rome:
"Here is the typical way Bishop Fellay phrases the matter now to escape personal
responsibility: “we thank God, we have been preserved from any kind of
Agreement from last year [sic]”.10 Bishop Fellay talks as if the SSPX was spared
from the destruction of a hurricane, rather than spared from the destruction which
would have flowed from his own attempts to reach an agreement submitting the
SSPX to unconverted Rome.
Although Bishop Fellay indicates here that an agreement last year would have
turned out badly because Pope Francis became pope, this in no way forecloses a
future agreement with unconverted Rome when the terms are “favorable”. This
consideration leads us to the third reason, immediately below:"
~ ABL recognized his mistake and did something about it -- +F pretends that
ABL did not recognize it, nor that he did anything different to correct it.
~ ABL desired greatly to AVOID being corrupted by modernist Rome but +F is
showing no fear of being subject to heretics. It's as though he thinks it's a
good idea to place the entire Society under the episcopal thumb of Newrome.
P 9 ~ In as late as 2003, +F was critical of Campos, Brazil, for committing the
ѕυιcιdє of a practical agreement with unconverted Rome under the unclean spirit
of Vatican II (he calls it "the immense fuzziness, otherwise known as the spirit
of Vatican II").
P 10 ~ +F attempts to falsify the words of ABL where he said he retracted his
May 5th protocol, by saying that he did not "reject" it. We are reminded when
the Popes of old used to say they "say, declare, define, pronounce," and now we
know why. It's because there were XSPXHEBF-types even in those days, who
would dare to make a difference based on one word or one nuance.
This is remeniscent of Probate court!
P 12 ~ ABL shows how Newrome was demanding of him to abandon his 'errors' and
to come back to the 'truth' -- the so-called truth of Vatican II!
"Consequently, it is clear that the only truth that exists today
for the Vatican is the conciliar truth, the spirit of the Council, the spirit
of Assisi. That is the truth of today. But we will have nothing to do
with this for anything in the world!"
Operation Survival vs. Operation ѕυιcιdє
P 13 ~ This dialogue with the deaf continues. I have to say, that I appreciate
the efforts of TrueTrad.com and TheRecusant for reprinting this great work as
a supplement to the regular issue...
I find it ironic that the "dialogue with the deaf" that ABL lamented is now going on between the Resistance and the denizens of Menzingen. For some mysterious reason, God saw fit to hide this horror from the eyes of the Founder, who would have no doubt taken sure steps to avoid this scandal from the start.
Topic: The Recusant - Issue 12 - December 2013 (Supplementary) (Read 1047 times)