So, no updates for 3 months, no Mass schedule for this month. No issue for the New Year, seems to be all over for the Recusant.

Never mind Christmas pudding, a large piece of humble pie was prescribed ... Mea culpa ... Now where for them?

Judging by the comments somewhere else, the recusant's been busy kick in' it with Pablo the Chicano.

It is a good publication of the Resistance highlighting the anti-Modernist stance of Archbishop Lefebvre and various priests. Hope it continues and pushes for unity among those supporting the Resistance.

It is clear that you do not enjoy his commentary. So why are you asking for more?

Why should he be casting pearls before swine, to use a rather common metaphor?

The thought that teachers are busy at this time of year has not crossed your mind?

Most of the content is the work of others, until recently not even the editorial was his, and his other half does the layout. And as others have pointed out, he's found time for forum posting.

To think he could dictate to Bp. Williamson who he could/couldn't say Mass for. Do you really think the bishop is going to stand for that? Well now there's competition:
https://respicestellam.wordpress.com/2015/01/12/the-second-mass-in-earlsfield/

The problem is he thinks this is all about faith, it isn't. He’ll never be part of the bishop’s clique.  As ggreg said ”Dressing up in tweed and Wishing they were dukes.”, playing at Brideshead etc. faith is almost secondary to them.

Now the faithful in England are either following the bishop or returning to the Society. It's game over for The Recusant.

Most of the content is the work of others, until recently not even the editorial was his, and his other half does the layout. And as others have pointed out, he's found time for forum posting.

Is that a problem ? Is it a shame to publish the writings of Archbishop Lefebvre and others defending the Faith ? Is it a shame to get help in editing and doing the layout ? Is it a shame to find time posting on a forum ?

Do you think you are doing the world a greater favour by publishing your very own venom on this forum ?

The problem is he thinks this is all about faith, it isn't.

Obviously, for you it isn't about the Faith. You simply have some vices you can't control.

He’ll never be part of the bishop’s clique.  As ggreg said ”Dressing up in tweed and Wishing they were dukes.”, playing at Brideshead etc. faith is almost secondary to them.

Now the faithful in England are either following the bishop or returning to the Society. It's game over for The Recusant

Is that the knot in your knickers ? Being part of this or that clique ? So then, for you it's not about the Faith is it ? Is that where you spend your time and energy, throwing stones at people who don't belong to your little clique ?

What a big boy you are ..

1st Mansion:

Your (Peterp's) not-so-hidden agenda is showing.

His (her) studied anonymity is also showing, and has been showing for a long time. :scratchchin:

Your comments are unbalanced and judgemental :

Work is not preventing publishing and website updates – it would only take a few seconds to update the Mass schedule, for example.

Do you know why some updates that you expected to happen did not happen ? Did you ask the webmaster ? Or do you assume bad motives, because you have a bone to pick, or because as they say, it takes one to know one ?

Do you think it right for a layman to decided who the bishop (or priest for that matter) can say Mass for?

How do you know this is the reason behind your 'missed' updates ? Assumption is the mother of all error.

Yes they have created an approved list; they are the authority chosen by God to maintain a list of the remaining handful of valid priests left upon this each.  Or even (over at “CatholicCandle”) to determine which traditional priests are validly ordained?

Is it unreasonable to question the validity of a priest, in these times where plenty of good reasons exists to do so ? Can this not be brought up against many other Trad groups ? Is not the SSPX to be faulted for being too negligent and accepting NO priests without regarding their doubtful past ?

This is the arrogant nature of the Resistance and why they continue to split

Another empty blanket accusation. The same nonsense can be brought against the SSPX, and in fact has been brought against the Catholic Church itself.

The Recusant faithful are recanting and returning to the Society.

What makes you say that ? Any proof, or is it just wishful thinking ?

And if it were true, what exactly does it prove ? Is not the SSPX right now recanting the Archbishops fight and returning to the Conciliar Church ? So, where does that leave YOU ?

There remain a few who will blindly following the bishop anywhere, hence the new London venue.

There remain a few who are willing to keep up the good fight and refuse to "howl with the Jєωs for the flesh pots of Egypt".

But it is over for the Recusant. Their congregation has collapsed.

Has it ? Maybe in your little world it has, but not in my world and that of many others. You sound like chicken little.

They can't cover the costs to fly in priests, rent halls etc.

Now, there's a sound theological argument against those rebels..

Soo… there's really only one update that can occur and that is to close down the website. It really is all over for The Recusant.

Why don't you go tell the King that the sky is falling.. :scared2: :king:

So it is now The Yankeesant. The Recusant is dead. A new life beckons state-side (assuming Mr. Pablo can sort out the visas) for a Boston Seminary Latin teacher. It's over for the Recusant resistance, that didn't last long. But at least he's will to 'put his money where his mouth is'. How many of Bp.Williamson's followers can say the same?