CathInfo.com

Here's the thing:

Some see Jєωs coming out of the woodwork, therefore Msgr. Vigano is controlled by Jєωs.

Some see Opus Dei coming out of the woodwork, therefore, Msgr. Vigano is controlled by Opus Dei.

Some see Msgr. Vigano giving Trump a pass on the vax, and therefore we can't listen to anything he says against the vax.

Some see him not condemning Putin, therefore, he must be in cahoots with Russia.

And whatever your pet positions are (flat/round earth; sedevacantisme, sedeprivationisme, Bennyvacantisme, R&R, indult, or Novus Ordo, episcopal orders, etc.), whatever he isn't doing to promote them, its natural, therefore, to consider he is compromised in some way.

Let me tell you what I see (voicing opinions is what a forum is for; you needn't agree with me):

I see a shepherd who, with nothing more than a poison pen, has knocked the entire conciliar edifice off its axis, such that large sections of it, and chunks of all the aforementioned parties have -to one degree or another- gravitated towards him.

And why?

Because whatever other faults he might possess -objectively, or merely according to our chosen crisis orrientation- the sheep hear the voice of the shepherd in his writings and doctrine.

The only precedent I can think of who was able to unite -in some degree- all the parties under the banner of true doctrine was Msgr. Lefebvre (particularly before 1983).

I am not blind to some of the particular concerns this or that faction has regarding Msgr. Vigano, but from my perspective, whatever truth there may be in these complaints, he possesses the two most important qualities necessary in our time:

1) He is somehow able to get through to conciliarists, and drag them to the right, to varying degrees, and in the process

2) He is dismantling the credibility of conciliarism (just look what Bergoglio has been forced to do in the last couple years to stop the drift toward some flavor of traditionalism).

These are arguably the two qualities most essential for the restoration of tradition, and we will not have a Catholic pope until this happens (i.e., they are prerequisites).

For these reasons, I support him (without being blind to the objections some have about him).

Having him arise on the scene is good for the Church and for souls.

And how did Vigano convert?    Even the "miraculous marrano", Roy Schoeman has a conversion cover story.