https://traditioninaction.org/Questions/B999_M108_Jose.html

So Mr. McFarland, would you like to defend this too?






TIA,

 The following photos were taken from the site Syllabus. They are also available on the official site of the SSPX/Spain (here).

 The artwork is terribly and strikingly modernistic and seemingly Masonic. The church itself appears to be something more like a nightclub, though we should wait until it is finished, the façade indicates this as well. When put in juxtaposition with the atrocious art of the Vatican 2 sect, there is little or no difference.

 The SSPX has picked up the new trend of creating images of the Virgin (if indeed we can call it that) out of junk and scrap metal. Bishop De Galarreta appears smiling in the pictures.

 The Neo-SSPX needed a tasteless scrap metal rendering of the Virgin in order to reflect their new position.

 It seems that the Neo-SSPX has dedicated this church to St. James (on his feast day, July 25th) and the construction is complete. It is still difficult to believe that this church belongs to the SSPX.

      K.J.


[color][size][font]


 Update

 Below is a picture of the altar after having been dedicated. This, obviously, appears to be anything but Traditional Catholic. Notice the short hair of the 'Virgin' with no veil. Notice that the 'crucifix' lacks the INRI inscription and the lack of Blood on the figure. It certainly has the neo-Pagan, modernist signature all over it. It's hard to imagine what the superiors were thinking.

      K.J.


[/font][/size][/color]