Author Topic: Anyone care to summarize? (Read 4586 times)

Adolphus · « **Reply #10 on:** November 06, 2014, 09:06:32 AM »

Quote from: Fortitudo

Quote from: pbax
Basically 75% which is made up of Sedes […]

About another 10% are also against but they are from the SSPX […]

Now there is 10% that neither take the Sede nor neoSSPX […]

Oh the other 5% just like to stir and not worth commenting about […]

Thank you for breaking down the perception, I appreciate that.

I would count myself amongst the 10% that is not sede nor neoSSPX who support the Bishop and the idea we should wait and see.

I personally feel it is quite a limb for him to have hung out upon, and I do not think he would do so lightly. So, he must take it very seriously for some reason.

I do subscribe to his EC's and when I first read them I chuckled to myself about the problem it causes the sedes to have Our Lady talking about the Pope. Kinda funny when you think about it.

I would have expected to have 95% of the so-called resistance opposing the messages, regardless of the position one may have about the Holy See, because such messages said that the motu proprio Summorum pontificuм was a fruit of the Rosary Crusade, that Our Lady blessed the first Rosary Crusade, that the first Rosary Crusade was successful.

All this is so wrong, that His Excellency had to try to correct it in the third part of his "Inside Story".

Elizabeth · « **Reply #11 on:** November 06, 2014, 09:10:55 AM »

Quote from: Fortitudo

Quote from: Elizabeth
Quote from: Fortitudo

and also why does everyone hate her so much?

Nobody hates her. (although I doubt you meant the word in its sin against the 5th Commandment sense)

In fact, I am sure a lot of people love her.

Coulda fooled me! It seems an awful lot of vitriol is slung her way, and that is why I was wondering.

I guess I was wondering if the vitriol is because she claims an apparition, or if it occurred before the apparition because she had some unpopular position on something.

A good place to begin understanding might be to study what the Church has always taught regarding the endless stream of people claiming to speak for Heaven, or read a little of St. John of the Cross.

Thurifer · « **Reply #12 on:** November 06, 2014, 09:28:36 AM »

Quote from: Fortitudo

I guess I was wondering if the vitriol is because she claims an apparition, or if it occurred before the apparition because she had some unpopular position on something.

I would think the vitriol you perceive is merely criticism. Most normal people would not consider it bitter at all if you knew this "seer" as a poster over the years.

What has been lost, or not mentioned in these threads, is the absolute obnoxiousness of this person as a poster. On the old Angel Queen she managed to embed herself in with that very incestuous group that used to run roughshod over anyone who dared not see everything as they did. Back in the day at AQ, you could be in agreement with someone at a level of 99.9%. But that .1% difference would bring out the posse and before you knew it, you may say something that would get you banned.

Simple disagreements made politely, be myself and many others, were met by rude and nasty posts. And when you would get her in a corner and explain in a nice way how she wasn't necessarily right about something, a guy like gpmtrad would come around and work on you. So honestly, it was not all her fault. It was the nature of that board and I think she has a natural talent for manipulating others. And I mean natural as in garden variety. It wasn't based on any super intelligence or intellectual gifts.

She also monopolized the board and it was not uncommon for her to make 40 posts per day. Many of us eventually started referring to the board as the Dawn Marie Show. I honestly don't know where she got the time to be so active and still receive visions.

That triggers another thought. I always found it odd that so many women who claim to have large families and also homeschool have so much time for being busy bodies on forums. But that is just an aside. But a topic I have been meaning to broach for quite awhile.

Fortitudo · « **Reply #13 on:** November 06, 2014, 04:48:13 PM »

Quote from: Thurifer

Quote from: Fortitudo
I guess I was wondering if the vitriol is because she claims an apparition, or if it occurred before the apparition because she had some unpopular position on something.

I would think the vitriol you perceive is merely criticism. Most normal people would not consider it bitter at all if you knew this "seer" as a poster over the years.

What has been lost, or not mentioned in these threads, is the absolute obnoxiousness of this person as a poster. On the old Angel Queen she managed to embed herself in with that very incestuous group that used to run roughshod over anyone who dared not see everything as they did. Back in the day at AQ, you could be in agreement with someone at a level of 99.9%. But that .1% difference would bring out the posse and before you knew it, you may say something that would get you banned.

Simple disagreements made politely, be myself and many others, were met by rude and nasty posts. And when you would get her in a corner and explain in a nice way how she wasn't necessarily right about something, a guy like gpmtrad would come around and work on you. So honestly, it was not all her fault. It was the nature of that board and I think she has a natural talent for manipulating others. And I mean natural as in garden variety. It wasn't based on any super intelligence or intellectual gifts.

She also monopolized the board and it was not uncommon for her to make 40 posts per day. Many of us eventually started referring to the board as the Dawn Marie Show. I honestly don't know where she got the time to be so active and still receive visions.

That triggers another thought. I always found it odd that so many women who claim to have large families and also homeschool have so much time for being busy bodies on forums. But that is just an aside. But a topic I have been meaning to broach for quite awhile.

A worthy topic indeed. I am only able to duck in at morning coffee or nap.