That "interview" was cooked by a tone-deaf neo-con ( is there any other kind? ) commiting agitprop.
Total fake.
I think, as far as I'm concerned anyway, that you'll have to provide a bit of solid evidence for your claims that it is a "fake." It may well be, but not because you say it is.
'Course not. Even if I had any, arguing from authority is still a crap shoot.
Anyway, if you read the alleged Bergoglio quotes, the idioms used are not at all similar to anything I've watched him use on TV or in print.
Annnnndddd... since so much of the "initial take" by the media has come from later-discredited "sources", odds favor anything as false to the very grammar of the man as this - in my pontifically humble opinion - to be discreditable, as well.
Better?