http://www.miamiarch.org/ip.asp?op=Article_13102810144642

A Conciliar Cardinal describes their religion.  Where is the condemnation from Menzingen? Where is the condemnation from the Resistance in Florida?

An example:
"  The Second Vatican Council was the main event in the Church in the 20th Century. In principle, it meant an end to the hostilities between the Church and modernism, which was condemned in the First Vatican Council. On the contrary: neither the world is the realm of evil and sin –these are conclusions clearly achieved in Vatican II—nor is the Church the sole refuge of good and virtue. Modernism was, most of the time, a reaction against injustices and abuses that disparaged the dignity and the rights of the person. "


Is this your Church?

http://www.miamiarch.org/ip.asp?op=Article_13102810144642

A Conciliar Cardinal describes their religion.  Where is the condemnation from Menzingen? Where is the condemnation from the Resistance in Florida?

An example:
"  The Second Vatican Council was the main event in the Church in the 20th Century. In principle, it meant an end to the hostilities between the Church and modernism, which was condemned in the First Vatican Council. On the contrary: neither the world is the realm of evil and sin –these are conclusions clearly achieved in Vatican II—nor is the Church the sole refuge of good and virtue. Modernism was, most of the time, a reaction against injustices and abuses that disparaged the dignity and the rights of the person. "


Is this your Church?

Where is the condemnation from Bishop Williamson or Fr. Pfeiffer?

My point:

This trash just came out on the 28th.

Do you expect the SSPX or the Resistance to keep up with, and denounce, every utterance of modernism that comes out of Rome?

They would have to employ 50 full-time staffers to keep up with all the garbage Rome is putting out.

It is a new religion where it believes in universal salvation and accepts the Second Vatican Council but rejects all the other councils.

It has a Catholic history and the errors subsist in mass ignorance, so those who are not ignorant of the faith who are within the conciliar church could have the faith - the usual orthodox indult priest for example.

No, this isn't my Church.

My Church is the One, True Church, not the Counciliar Church, which began a new religion.

Quote from: SeanJohnson

Quote from: J.Paul

http://www.miamiarch.org/ip.asp?op=Article_13102810144642

A Conciliar Cardinal describes their religion.  Where is the condemnation from Menzingen? Where is the condemnation from the Resistance in Florida?

An example:
"  The Second Vatican Council was the main event in the Church in the 20th Century. In principle, it meant an end to the hostilities between the Church and modernism, which was condemned in the First Vatican Council. On the contrary: neither the world is the realm of evil and sin –these are conclusions clearly achieved in Vatican II—nor is the Church the sole refuge of good and virtue. Modernism was, most of the time, a reaction against injustices and abuses that disparaged the dignity and the rights of the person. "


Is this your Church?

Where is the condemnation from Bishop Williamson or Fr. Pfeiffer?

My point:

This trash just came out on the 28th.

Do you expect the SSPX or the Resistance to keep up with, and denounce, every utterance of modernism that comes out of Rome?

They would have to employ 50 full-time staffers to keep up with all the garbage Rome is putting out.

The dog won't hunt.   It seems that there are enough staffers to keep them apprised of every utterance of the Roi de Menzigen.
It is a matter of focus and what is deemed important enough to know.

It is the time now to hound and harass these apostate Bishops every time that they begin to spout their heresies and errors on the national and international level.
Is there no one left who will defend the Church from these predations???

I am reminded of the ACLU and the ADL -- whenever someone comes
out with a public statement that these types don't like, their rubber
meets the road with howls of "anti-Semitism!!"  They're so predictable
that way, to the point where you just know that it won't take but a few
hours for their reaction to go public.  

The fact that they are relentless is what has gradually brought down
their opposition, because eventually it gets to be tiresome to see the
reaction happen, to the point where you just know that it will happen.  

If the Resistance took that approach, maybe it would have an impact,
but like SeanJohn says, it would require a staff of sentries whose job
it is to keep tabs day in and day out.  


.

J. Paul,

I appreciated your and Holly's comments on the resistance thread. I believe that you are undertaking a good work by trying to bring to light the overarching problem with the traditionalist movement as a whole.

Your soul is Catholic and so is your thinking.

To answer your question: The conciliar sect is the ѕуηαgσgυє of satan, and antichrist, and quintessentially not Catholic. Were it Catholic we would never have gone out from the visible structure, which it captured and enslaved, to upbuild the Church and transmit the Faith in the hinterlands.

The Catholic Church has one mark, which is the summa of the Four Marks; and that is the mark of the transmission of the Faith. Wherever the Faith is transmitted, there is the Church - because it is impossible to transmit the Faith without the Mystical Union of the Head with His Members: the Vine with the attached branches.  

It its Holy Essence, the Church is a fecundity.
 
Now does the conciliar sect transmit the Faith? A resounding 'no' is the answer. The conciliar sect has for its raison d'etre to abort the Faith before it can come to fruition in souls and/or to murder it in souls who once believed. Ergo the conciliar sect is not the Church.

As you are so wise to point out, too, too many traditional priests are content to fiddle with puerile, internecine grudges and grievances while the Church burns to the ground, were that possible.

There has come into the world an indescribable and manifold abyss of satanic error, which the Church is ordained by God to engage in mortal combat. You talked about the need for the formation of a new and dynamic Catholic order, not some retread of the old SSPX, to defend against the onslaught of error choking the very life out of the lungs of the all the nations.  

Let's face it - the SSPX, good though it was, did not defend against all the errors. It mainly defended against the errors of religious indifferentism. It never waged war against the heresy and schism of theological, philosophical, and scientific evolution, which is the arch principle of the revolution against the Lord and against His Christ.

The hour is late. Five more years of SSPX-style "defense" of the Faith, and the world of 2013 will look like Christendom.

Either we seriously re-calibrate and start defending the entire deposit of the Faith - either we attack the errors of scientism head on - or God will pour down fire from Heaven to purge the earth of all the filth.  

The resistance has no trouble being an SSPX ADL and sermonizing over every stutter of Bishop Fellay.

The real battle for the faith awaits outside of the confines of the SSPX sphere. The question is when are they going to leave the training ground  and join it?

Should there be Catholic congregations and groups which are on a constant offensive against the Conciliar sect and its Father? You bet! relentless and unceasing, dedicated and of singular purpose. But are there any?

I don't think that there will be any at any time soon. There is apparently no stomach for the larger fight.

I would ask again, Is there no one left who will defend the Church from these predations?

From the last few responses, I would conclude the answer to be no.

Awesome post!