Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9

Author Topic: The 1962 Missal  (Read 1695 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Philip

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #35 on: Yesterday at 09:59:33 AM »
SimpleMan,

The missal rubrics were all changed with the publication of missals after Rubricarum instructum etc.

Your missal will have the old Rubricae Generales of titles I to XX.  These go back to the 1570 missal (and earlier) having been modified, for clarity, and with minor changes over the centuries until Leo XIII.

Depending whether your book was published in the first or second decade of the 20thC it will include Additiones et Variationes titles I - X - if published after 1913.

These sets of rubrics were completely replaced from 1960 with new 'General Rubrics' (1 -137) and 'General Rubrics of the Missal' (269 -530).  (The 1961 Breviary has 138 - 268 not printed in the missal.)
There was also a new Ritus servandus pubished with MR1962 that changed things like bow to the Cross at Oremus, no incensing of the celebrant after the Gospel at a Missa cantata etc.

MusicaSacra have made available a pdf scan of a MR1962 - easy to find on the Web.

It is worth comparing the the new rubrics with the previous sets.
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #36 on: Yesterday at 05:22:24 PM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on March 18, 2026, 07:06:46 PM

Please dont be an idiot. Please.

Read what Plenus posted just above.

"FOR THE SAKE OF CONFORMITY"... "WITHIN THE FRATERNITY"


You dont want to be an idiot do you?


Is the SSPX (the fraternity)  the same thing as tradition?
If, for two or three years, this decision was not applied by some members of the Fraternity, it was
due to personal initiatives contrary to the will of the Founder and the practice of Econe.
But these initiatives have now been suppressed, and liturgical unity is being pursued throughout the
Society. For we rightly believe that the 1962 edition of the Ordo Missae corresponds perfectly to the
Ordo of St. Pius V and of St. Pius X.
To try to establish essential differences between the 1962 edition and the Ordo of St. Pius V and St.
Pius X is to manifest a legalistic and Jansenist mentality.

Econe, 26th of December, 1988
+ Marcel Lefebvre
Founder of the Priestly Fraternity of St Pius X

Yup read it Tommy
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #37 on: Yesterday at 06:21:37 PM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on March 17, 2026, 09:08:16 AM
Bishop Williamson never said anything negative ever once in public or private about priests who said the pre 58.

If a certain group of priests wants to mandate it for their own members, that is their own business.

The link with sedevacantism is spurious.

Archbishop Lefebvre just made the decision to do with that, but it really was not his job to have to decide what missal to "mandate" to others. It was a practical decision obviously for the common good of his Society.

There is not one single quote from the Archbishop speaking negatively about the pre 55 missal. NOT ONE.  Let that sink in folks.

The sudden frowning on it comes from the post 1990s SSPX days. Nowhere else.
It was actually Archbishop Lefebvre's duty!

Archbishop Lefebvre quote from Tarmac Turkey post

"If this does not harm our faith, we must recognize the authority of the Sovereign Pontiff who publishes these books, this new breviary, and we must submit, even if we have some preference for the breviary or the missal of St. Pius X."

You might want to read it again Tommy, page 1 first post on this thread.
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #38 on: Yesterday at 08:32:54 PM »
Except we now know, which they didn't then that Bugnini admitted this liturgy was the precursor to the novus ordo
Logged

Offline SimpleMan

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #39 on: Yesterday at 09:21:50 PM »
Quote from: Philip on Yesterday at 09:59:33 AM
SimpleMan,

The missal rubrics were all changed with the publication of missals after Rubricarum instructum etc.

Your missal will have the old Rubricae Generales of titles I to XX.  These go back to the 1570 missal (and earlier) having been modified, for clarity, and with minor changes over the centuries until Leo XIII.

Depending whether your book was published in the first or second decade of the 20thC it will include Additiones et Variationes titles I - X - if published after 1913.

These sets of rubrics were completely replaced from 1960 with new 'General Rubrics' (1 -137) and 'General Rubrics of the Missal' (269 -530).  (The 1961 Breviary has 138 - 268 not printed in the missal.)
There was also a new Ritus servandus pubished with MR1962 that changed things like bow to the Cross at Oremus, no incensing of the celebrant after the Gospel at a Missa cantata etc.

MusicaSacra have made available a pdf scan of a MR1962 - easy to find on the Web.

It is worth comparing the the new rubrics with the previous sets.

Thanks for the information.  I'll check it out when I get a chance.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9
« previous next »