Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9

Author Topic: The 1962 Missal  (Read 2173 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NIFH

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #25 on: March 18, 2026, 06:36:32 PM »
Quote from: Giovanni Berto on March 18, 2026, 05:55:51 PM
In practical terms, what is the difference between the Sedevacantists and you? You have to ignore your "superiors" if you want to keep the faith.
Lots and lots and lots of prayers for the conversion of the pope.  Also whatever other actions that may help him and all my poor brothers and sisters in Christ wake up to the immense dangers to their faith, peace in the world, and salvation of many souls.

That means 'una cuм' too.

No, I'm not positive he still is pope.  We must agree that neither of us knows for sure.

We don't know = una cuм and obedience when possible--because there's no harm in it, and playing with schism is not funny.
Logged

Offline Giovanni Berto

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #26 on: March 18, 2026, 06:51:40 PM »
Quote from: NIFH on March 18, 2026, 06:36:32 PM
...

No, I'm not positive he still is pope.  We must agree that neither of us knows for sure.

...

At least we agree on something.
Logged

Offline Giovanni Berto

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #27 on: March 18, 2026, 06:53:31 PM »
Quote from: SimpleMan on March 18, 2026, 06:21:17 PM
I thought it was merely made optional, not disallowed categorically.

As another commentator points out, the communion of the faithful isn't really a part of the Mass.  The Mass is complete and integral if only the priest receives communion, thus completing the sacrifice.

Well, if the missal does not mention it, it cannot be added, right? This is how I understand it. The missal must be followed scrupulously. Nothing can be added or removed.
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #28 on: March 18, 2026, 07:06:46 PM »
Quote from: Infirmus on March 18, 2026, 12:27:54 AM
April 1983 - Superior General's Letter #24 | Maison Générale https://share.google/d4Q3K9LLZnF90C8vj

The Archbishop would not speak negatively of the pre 55 liturgy but he spoke negatively of those who chose to reject the obedience to adhere to the legitimacy and use of the 62 liturgy.


Please dont be an idiot. Please.

Read what Plenus posted just above.

"FOR THE SAKE OF CONFORMITY"... "WITHIN THE FRATERNITY"


You dont want to be an idiot do you?


Is the SSPX (the fraternity)  the same thing as tradition?
Logged

Offline NIFH

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #29 on: March 18, 2026, 07:25:57 PM »
Quote from: TomGubbinsKimmage on March 18, 2026, 07:06:46 PM

Please dont be an idiot. Please.

Read what Plenus posted just above.

"FOR THE SAKE OF CONFORMITY"... "WITHIN THE FRATERNITY"


You dont want to be an idiot do you?


Is the SSPX (the fraternity)  the same thing as tradition?
Obeying non-dangerous commands of Christ's Vicar on Earth is Traditional and Catholic.

Playing with schism (sedevacantism) is neither Traditional nor Catholic.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 9
« previous next »