Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4

Author Topic: The 1962 Missal  (Read 714 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline NIFH

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2026, 08:56:28 PM »
It's like the man chewing on beef jerky who says, "I'm a vegetarian."

"We're continuing the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre," while everyone knows His Excellency expelled the priests who wouldn't use the '62.

All this after receiving orders from the white martyr Bishop Williamson, who used the '62 exclusively.
Logged

Offline Infirmus

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2026, 11:47:14 PM »
Quote from: bvmariae on March 16, 2026, 09:33:39 AM
.

- Source: Rev. Fr. Anthony Cekada; Work of Human Hands - A Theological Critique of the Mass of Paul VI; Appendix; pg. 403ff (emphasis added)
Typical! A sede using a sede lying about Archbishop Lefebvre! Matthew take this crap off!
Logged

Offline Lazarus

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #7 on: Yesterday at 08:11:50 AM »
Quote from: Infirmus on March 16, 2026, 11:47:14 PM
Typical! A sede using a sede lying about Archbishop Lefebvre! Matthew take this crap off!
Can you explain the meaning of your sentence? I re-read it several times, despite considerable efforts, I was unable to uncover the undoubtedly profound signification of your words. 
Logged

Offline Godefroy

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #8 on: Yesterday at 08:41:19 AM »
Quote from: Lazarus on Yesterday at 08:11:50 AM
Can you explain the meaning of your sentence? I re-read it several times, despite considerable efforts, I was unable to uncover the undoubtedly profound signification of your words.
Is english your first language?
Logged

Offline TomGubbinsKimmage

Re: The 1962 Missal
« Reply #9 on: Yesterday at 09:08:16 AM »
Bishop Williamson never said anything negative ever once in public or private about priests who said the pre 58.

If a certain group of priests wants to mandate it for their own members, that is their own business.

The link with sedevacantism is spurious.

Archbishop Lefebvre just made the decision to do with that, but it really was not his job to have to decide what missal to "mandate" to others. It was a practical decision obviously for the common good of his Society.

There is not one single quote from the Archbishop speaking negatively about the pre 55 missal. NOT ONE.  Let that sink in folks.

The sudden frowning on it comes from the post 1990s SSPX days. Nowhere else.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
« previous next »