Yes, that means putting it down as law, not rewriting it as in the novus ordo.  Right!  They still mentioned the name of the current Pope, if there was a current Pope before it was codified.  My question was if anyone knows whose name was mentioned during the Great Western Schism, or for that matter whenever the pope dies and while waiting for the new successor of Peter.  During the interregnum.

From Sancta Missa

...The Canon that we say is always the one finally restored by Pius V, that remains as it was in the days of Gregory I, and that goes back far behind his time till its origin is lost in the mists that hang over the first centuries when the Roman Christians met together to "do the things the Lord commanded at appointed times" (I Clem., xl)....

It is observed throughout the Canon. The priest prays first for the Church, then for the pope and diocesan ordinary by name. Antistes, from antisto (proistemi), is one of the many older words for "bishop". At the pope's name a slight inclination is made. When the Roman See is vacant, the mention of the pope is left out. In Rome the bishop's name is left out; the pope is local bishop there. The bishop must be canonically appointed and confirmed, otherwise he is not mentioned. But he need not yet be consecrated. It is always the ordinary of the diocese, even in the case of regulars who are exempt. A diocesan bishop in saying Mass changes the form "et Antistite nostro N." into "et me indigno servo tuo". The pope naturally uses these words instead of "una cuм famulo tuo Papa nostro N.", and omits the clause about the bishop. The mention of the pope always occurs at this place. Otherwise in the Middle Ages there was a great variety in the names. A very old custom was to name the sovereign after the bishop ("et pro rege nostro N." or "Imperatore nostro N."). Pope Celestine I (422-32) refers to it in a letter to Theodosius II. Boniface I (418-22) writes to Emperor Honorius: "Behold in the very mysteries, among the prayers which the bishop offers for your Empire . . ." (Drews, Entstehungsgesch., 7). So also the "De Sacramentis" says: "Prayer is offered for the people, for the king, for the others" (IV, iv). Throughout the Middle Ages the sovereign was always named. Pius V removed the clause from the Missal. In the case of Catholic princes a privilege is given by which they are put in. In Austria the clause "et pro Imperatore nostro Francisco Josepho" is always added by the celebrant, and in Hungary it becomes of course "pro rege nostro". At one time the priest went on to pray for himself at this place (Bona, Rerum liturg., II, 11). Ebner quotes as the commonest form: "Mihi quoque indignissimo famulo tuo propitius esse digneris et ab omnibus me peccatorum offensionibus emundare" (Miss. Rom., 401). We have already noted this as being almost exactly a version of the Alexandrineform. The word "orthodoxi" that follows is very rare in the West. It is a link between our Canon and the Antiochene Anaphora.

Myrna, I see what you're saying yet I'm arguing against those sedes who would disagree with your view.  It is this group who are extremists and who anathematize anyone who doesn't view the world as they see it.  This is the problem, the scandal and the point of the thread. 

Myrna, I see what you're saying yet I'm arguing against those sedes who would disagree with your view.  It is this group who are extremists and who anathematize anyone who doesn't view the world as they see it.  This is the problem, the scandal and the point of the thread.

Thank you, Pax and I have been thinking all these extremists are their own worst enemy.  Why do so many, especially men, want to be the person that has the answer with their particular theory.  They want to be the theologian with the loudest voice as to what Traditional Bishop we have to pay mind to because after all THIS particular Bishop thinks like "I do", so he has to be correct. At least Bishop Pivarunas when asked if we can attend an Una cuм Mass, said, (paraphrasing)<<< if you are not worried about losing your faith, it's your decision.>>>>  He also doesn't add ...<<<< but if you attend don't come back to CMRI and expect to receive the Sacraments>>>>.   
The truth the way I see it, God does not expect any of us to be Canon lawyers or theologians, all these quotes sometimes make my head spin because they are either taken out of context or were spoken by good and holy people decades ago who couldn't imagine what we are going through...
...With the Roman See being vacant unless you want to admit Stubborn that it's okay that Freemasons, Modernists, and Protestants are allowed to have a voice in a Papal election.  Hey!  Why not after all the Truth only subsists in the Catholic Church. (Your pope's new teaching, not mine)  
I pray during Te Igitur Just as Christ asked the Father to guide and protect the Church that He instituted, the priest prays for the Catholic Church as during the time of interregnum.
God knows exactly how and when He will end this crisis, why not just relax and allow Him to grant this peace and protection, to unite and guide her the whole world over. 
Keep the Faith, stop tearing down this Bishop or that Bishop just because his theory doesn't fit the agenda.  Trust in God!  

Stubborn you see what you want to see, a Catholic sitting in the Chair, I don't!  Therefore if there isn't a Catholic sitting there it is vacant in the eyes of God.  In that sense it is vacant!

Just remember Stubborn that God Himself called St.Peter Satan, and for what reason, just because Peter merely suggested to Jesus that "Far be it from thee, O Lord; this will never happen to thee."  Jesus turned to Peter and said, "Get behind me, Satan, thou art a scandal to me; for thou dost not mind the things of God, but those of men."  Matthew 16; 21-23

You are a good servant, Stubborn, to Satan, because Francis does not mind the things of God but those of men.  

Peter's intention was mistaken, but not evil as is Francis and his ilk.  

So let this be a warning from the Bible to put God first.

Actions, not words.   

St. Thomas More said those words when we had a Catholic Pope, do you not see the difference?

You are a good servant, Stubborn, to Satan, because Francis does not mind the things of God but those of men.  

Let's stay on topic---  

Myrna, Are you suggesting that to name Francis in the Te Igitur prayer is to worship Satan?  Or are you suggesting that it's wrong?  I say it's not wrong to name Francis because his papacy's status is doubtful.  If it was absolutely certain that he wasn't the pope, then it would be a sin, but it's not certain, so, by default, a priest should pray for him.