“The one sole purpose of this step is to dedicate himself to prayer and silence, to celebrate the traditional Mass exclusively, and to work for Tradition, the only way of renewing the Church.”

[Choking on my coffee...]

The one sole step?

What liars!

We already have it from the horses mouth that +Huonder is assigned this task to act as an official liaison between the SSPX and Francis!

Disgraceful for priests to abuse truth so flagrantly.

The gorge rises.

And the idea that this altar girl using, Communion in the hand dispensing bishop is now going to suddenly “work for Tradition” (now that he is retired?) takes you all for idiots!

Of course, in Menzingen they now believe that facilitating an accord between the new-SSPX and ultra-modernist Rome = “working for Tradition!”

I want too join in union of prayer with Bishop Huonder and pray that the situation will develop in which there will be no need for a resistance.

The only situation that could develop which would make the resistance unnecessary is the pope burning the V2 docuмents in St Peter's square and prohibiting the new mass under penalty of excommunication.  (and a correction of the 500,000 other related things to these 2 evils).
.
But this will never happen because this isn't the new-sspx's goal.  They no longer will ACT to CONVERT new-rome.  They only want to become FRIENDS with these HERETICS and hope that new-rome will convert by EXAMPLE.  This is a naive and utopian dream.  It is a moral certainty that if you have bad friends, your morals will be corrupted.

The only situation that could develop which would make the resistance unnecessary is the pope burning the V2 docuмents in St Peter's square and prohibiting the new mass under penalty of excommunication.  (and a correction of the 500,000 other related things to these 2 evils).
.
But this will never happen because this isn't the new-sspx's goal.  They no longer will ACT to CONVERT new-rome.  They only want to become FRIENDS with these HERETICS and hope that new-rome will convert by EXAMPLE.  This is a naive and utopian dream.  It is a moral certainty that if you have bad friends, your morals will be corrupted.

Is it possible that with his new SSPX friends that Bishop Houder's morals will improve?  

Is it possible that with his new SSPX friends that Bishop Houder's morals will improve?  

Who cares?  What about all the other 1,000s of bishops in the world that the new-sspx will not affect because the new-sspx will have to "be positive" and not be able to criticize V2 or the new mass, just like when the FSSP joined new-rome, they couldn't criticize the heretical direction of new-rome.  Every trad group who has joined new-rome has been neutered and not allowed to be critical.  This makes "admonishing the sinners" of new-rome impossible, so the chances of them converting due to the new-sspx's influence, is almost nil.

Posted the following in The Remnant’s “comments” section, but doubt it will see the light of day (and even if they were inclined to publish it, they would get a call from the District within a couple hours to delete it).

Therefore, posting it here:


“Can someone explain to me how the joint declaration’s statement that “the one sole purpose” for Bishop Huonder’s retirement to the sspx school is to dedicate himself to prayer, silence, say the TLM, and work for the restoration of Tradition is compatible with the Diocese of Chur’s Kathnet announcement of a couple months ago, acknowledging that the bishop has been given this assignment by Francis to be a liaison between the SSPX and Rome?

Moreover, am I to believe the same bishop recently pictured celebrating the new Mass with altar girls, and giving communion in the hand, has suddenly changed his spots, and conveniently became a traditionalist on the day of his retirement?

And of what does Bishop Huonder’s newfound “traditionalism” consist, beyond saying the old Mass?  Does he suddenly reject his own former ecuмenism?  Does he reject the errors of Vatican II?  What are his thoughts on the new questionable sacraments (eg., vegetable oil for extreme unction)?  Etc., etc.

Just a few days after tossing cold water on the initiative of theologians who were seeking to continue the deposition process of Francis (initially begun by Cardinal Burke, and continued by the Correctio Fillialis), the SSPX now sends a disturbing message to its faithful:

We are on the same side as the modernists.

The SSPX, which once served as a bastion of truth, today tells a blatant falsehood through its superior general, regarding the purpose of Bishop Huonder’s arrival (contradicted by the bishop himself).

There is only one way this joint declaration is compatible with truth (at least subjectively):

The SSPX today believes that working for a practical accord with unconverted Rome = “working for Tradition.”

The previous generation of SSPXers were indoctrinated by Archbishop Lefebvre after the consecrations to hold such a position as the gravest danger to the faithful (see his 1991 Fideliter interview).

Conversely, the last 20 years of SSPX leadership have striven mightily (and successfully) to inculcate exactly the opposite principle: Legal recognition is the primary goal.

Very few have possessed the perspicacity of mind to detect this reorientation of the SSPX, and those who have have become maligned more than baby murdering devil worshippers.

Will The Remnant possess the journalistic integrity to allow this perspective to aire?  It will gain my respect if it does.”

Is it possible that with his new SSPX friends that Bishop Houder's morals will improve?  

Yes, some of his morals might improve, except for those associated with the 8th Commandment, since the leadership of the SSPX does not hold the 8th Commandment in high regard at all.