http://nonpossumus-vcr.blogspot.com/2018/05/congraciandose-con-roma-apostata-nota.htmlSource (translation, bold and comments in red, from Non Possumus) DEATH OF CARDINAL DARÍO CASTRILLÓN HOYOS
Cardinal Darío Castrillón Hoyos died in Rome on May 18, 2018. Called to the service of the Holy See in 1996, the prelate was gradually imposed as the privileged interlocutor between the Vatican and the Society of Saint Pius X, from 2000 to 2009First Prefect of the Congregation for the Clergy, then President of the Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei, the Cardinal played a fundamental role in the change of attitude of the Vatican towards the traditional liturgy.
At the end of the Roman pilgrimage of the Society of St. Pius X in 2000, he received the bishops consecrated by Bishop Marcel Lefebvre in 1988, putting an end to twelve years of ostracism [read: putting an end to twelve years of the glorious cross of be ignored and treated as lepers to defend the violated rights of Christ]
Two years later, Bishop Hoyos was the first Cardinal of the Church to solemnly celebrate the traditional liturgy in the Liberian Basilica, ignoring the reluctance of many of his brothers.
At the same time, while many bishops continued to launch arbitrary bans against the work of Bishop Lefebvre, he explained that the Act of Consecration of 1988 did not constitute a schism and that the Fraternity was "within the Church", deploring however "the the fact that there is a lack of full, more perfect communion, because communion exists "... [Obviously accordist quote]
Cardinal Hoyos also played a significant role with Benedict XVI in the promulgation of the Motu proprio Summorum pontificuм in 2007, and in the framework of the lifting of unjust sanctions against the Bishops of the Fraternity two years later, without hesitating to defend these last against the media unleashed . [In this interview - given in the days following the lifting of the alleged excommunication and in the context of the uproar caused by the remarks of Bishop Williamson on the so-called "h0Ɩ0cαųst" - we see that the Cardinal did not defend the Bishops, but rather Benedict XVI of media attacks, saying, among others, things like these: It's very simple. Monsignor Marcel Lefebvre committed an act of rebellion by ordering in 1988 four bishops without the pontifical mandate. This is a schismatic action . (...) Like him [Mons. Williamson] is not in full communion, it is not up to us to reprimand or punish him. It's up to Monsignor Fellay, who is his superior, and Fellay did it. " The Cardinal would have wished that a canonical solution for the Fraternity had been found. [Note that the Neo-FSSPX agreementists usually use the language of the enemy. That is why they speak, once again, of a "solution" for the SSPX, but it is the Conciliar Rome - liberal, modernist and apostate - that needs a "solution"] But this was never possible, since there has always been a lack of real will to receive the work of Bishop Lefebvre as he is . Because it is not taking something away from its mission of defending the Tradition -imposing it, for example, the recognition of doctrinal errors or the legitimacy of the new rite- as the Fraternity can work for the restoration of the Church. [Knowing that the Romans will read this note, the FSSPX does not miss the occasion, and asks, for the umpteenth time, the modernists, to be recognized "as is"]
However, it would be unfair not to exercise the virtue of gratitude for the actions of the Colombian prelate. They were brave, meeting the hostility of the progressives and the most bitter enemies of the Church. [Once again the FSSPX speaks like the enemy: the Cardinal - says the Fraternity - confronted the "progressives" (synonymous with liberals and modernists ). What about the Cardinal? Was he a Traditionalist? He was a moderate progressive (a "conservative"), and, then, an internal enemy of the Church, perhaps "less bitter," but an enemy after all; for what the Fraternity should have done is to ask for prayers for his soul instead of slavishly paying tribute]
Requiescat in pace.
The Fraternity forgets:
That Cardinal Castrillón was the head of the Ecclesia Dei Commission, of which Archbishop Lefebvre said : "he is in charge of the recovery of the traditionalists to submit them to the Council" (Month derniers cahiers, première série, n ° 1, Pour saluer Mgr Lefebvre, par F. Brigneau, Public, FB, p.35). That it was he who, in a letter addressed to the General Chapter of the San Pedro Fraternity, ordered them to celebrate the Novus Ordo Mass. That Cardinal Castrillón was the architect of the fall of Campos, who lamented so much the Fraternity before the change of attitude towards Rome. That Cardinal Castrillón is also owed the creation of the Institute of the Good Shepherd, formed by traitors to the work of Bishop Lefebvre. And a long etcetera.
This, what we say to finish, is what the FSSPX should have said:
God have mercy on Cardinal Castrillón.
Topic: SSPX article on DEATH OF CARDINAL DARÍO CASTRILLÓN HOYOS (Read 1447 times)