I don't know Sean, there are discernable patterns and events which say that that is precisely what they are trying to do. A different set of clothes perhaps, but the same substance under it all.
I was indeed comfortable with it for a fairly long time but that was a time when I never looked beneath the surface to more fundamental issues. And the new incarnation is identical in almost all things and its orientation. As I said, the same house, different room.
Carrying on the same apostolate is essentially replacing the failed thing with as close an approximation can be made.
1) By "more fundamental issues," are you referring to issues regarding the "recognize and resist" position generally?
2) Yes, we definitely started in 2011 by trying to ensure the "failed thing" would carry on in a new incarnation (and some like me, or supporters of the SAJM, still do). Our position is that it is not the "thing" (i.e., religious congregations, hierarchy, and authority
per se) that failed, but the people running them that failed.
We believe there is simply no precedent for independence in a Church which is constituted hierarchically.
Even in Benson's "Lord of the World," amidst the final persecution, and a crisis which exceeds ours in magnitude, with the priesthood whittled down to a half dozen cardinals, priests, and Pope, there was still hierarchy.
Perhaps we are wrong, but that is what we believe.
Not trying to argue; just trying to understand your perspective.