I attended 2 Masses this past Sunday and heard 2 sermons, but they did not hold
a candle to the one Fr. Pfeiffer gave. I know we shouldn't compare priests, and I am
not mentioning names, but for reference, I really do appreciate hearing the
"real meat" because I think I need it. I really don't like being uninformed. I want
to be able to prepare for what's coming, if at all possible. I'd much rather know
in advance than find out too late that I should have known something.
If I'm appreciating the sermons of Fr. Pfeiffer that much, it's only right that I should
send in a contribution!
The new declarations from the GC include a "condition" that says the SSPX can be
allowed one (new?) bishop. First off, we don't make "conditions" for obedience to
legitimate superiors. But the declarations make conditions, 6 of them, but 3 of
those are not really conditions, so that means there are 3 conditions, and a
bishop is one of the three. What happens if +Williamson is going to be expelled
from the SSPX: is the "one bishop" someone who will replace him? Is that what
+Fellay has in mind? Is that why he is so terrified of "rumors" on the Internet?
Here's an idea: IF YOU DON'T LIKE RUMORS, THEN SHOW UP ON THE INTERNET
YOURSELF AND EXPLAIN IT SO WE DON'T HAVE TO ASK THESE QUESTIONS!
But +Fellay won't do that. His safe bubble is hiding behind secrecy. The Internet
is much to up-front and honest, so it wouldn't work for him. No, he'll be much
happier punishing +Williamson for his ECs, and for answering ALL his mail, while
+Fellay doesn't dare do any such thing.