Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?  (Read 9494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Carissima

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 782
  • Reputation: +569/-229
  • Gender: Female
Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
« Reply #45 on: February 19, 2019, 10:04:37 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • Well, you seem to speak with absolute confidence, and I, personally, have no reason to doubt you or your source(s).  
    :laugh1:
    You believe a random guy on a forum’s family members over one of the longest running advocates/writers online for Our Lady of Good Success in the US? What’s your agenda? SSPX defender no matter what the circuмstance?


    Offline Carissima

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 782
    • Reputation: +569/-229
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #46 on: February 19, 2019, 10:08:17 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!1
  •   So then, let's just put the topic to rest.  If after over 2500 views, and 40 responses the alleged 'heavy statue' story is a fabrication, and there is not a shred of truth to it, then let's just drop it.
    Sorry, Matthew, too many topics on CI, undeserving of seemingly exhaustless attention, and endless commentary, survive into the indefinite future.  We're talking now about topics which, sometimes, get 10,000 plus views, and hundreds of comments, long after they become irrelevant, long after the victim has died, turned to dust and blown to the wind.  This is fast turning into one of those topics.  Stick a fork in it!
    Are you an armchair moderator for online forums? What do you care where this thread goes? Start a new one with a more valuable topic if you like, it’s a free country  :cheers:


    Offline nottambula

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 182
    • Reputation: +70/-82
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #47 on: February 20, 2019, 06:26:59 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • https://www.traditioninaction.org/Questions/B999_M117_Quito.html


    Statue Changed Her Face




    Dear Marian,

    Re: Sadness of Our Lady in Quito

    Her face looks so different from the way it appeared in 2011.

    I was happy to read about how she became so heavy that the SSPX priests could not lift her. I’m eager to learn more about Atila’s trip.

         In Maria,

         J.M.

    ______________________




    Bravo!



    Atila and Salwa,

    Re: Two Proofs of SSPX’s ‘Temperance’

    BRAVO!!!

    I am sure this will have many positive responses.

         Salve Maria!!!

         C.F.

    ______________________




    In Defense of Dr. Guimarães and Miss Bachar




    Dear Editors,

    Re: Two Proofs of SSPX’s ‘Temperance’

    Well I must say I read with great interest (and sadness) Dr. Atila S. Guimarães's eyewitness account at the Convent of Our Lady of Good Success. And then the story got even more interesting!

    As you may know, my friend James Larson has organized a wonderful endeavor for the purification of the Church consisting of a wordlwide Rosary for that intention on the very Feast of the Purification – Candelaria or Candlemas Day.

    He has also written searchingly of Our Lady of Good Success. So I was, and am, intently following the goings-on there this year, the second of Mr. Larson's endeavor.

    Our Lady's prophecies there regarding our time of apostasy are right in line with the Third Secret of Fatima, where Our Lady of Fatima unambiguously prophesied the Apostasy in the Church "at the highest levels," as all eyewitnesses to the several papal readings of the Secret unanimously confirm (here and here ).

    First, I must state I was very impressed and glad to hear the good Doctor was spending four to five hours a day in silent prayer and vigil before Our Lady of Good Success in the Convent Church. O that we were there!

    Second, I was interested because two small informal delegations went to Quito on pilgrimage – unaffiliated with the SSPX but traditional Catholics – from my own parish in New York City, Our Lady of Mount Carmel (which offers the traditional Latin Mass seven days a week, Lord be praised!), led by Fr. Christopher Salvatore, S.A.C. (the Pallottine Fathers), for the Feast Day.

    Fr. Salvatore lamented immediately upon his return to East Harlem that the nuns were stuck (my word) with the Novus Ordo rite alone. As confirmed by Dr. Guimarães.

    Upon further questioning by me this Sunday, Fr. Salvatore informed me that he felt compelled to celebrate the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass in the Extraordinary Form of the Tridentine Rite in his hotel room – which I found a scandalous state of affairs, frankly – as he was under the understanding that it was forbidden at the Convent and in fact the entire archdiocese of Quito; and further that special permission would have been required. Once again, in confirmation of the observations of Dr. Guimarães.

    Third, the scandal of the child-molesting priest, apparently co-chaplain to the nuns, and the arrest of this priest for wicked predation on an eleven year old child (!!) and a fourteen year old child (!) on or around the day after Candlemas Day itself was shocking and macabre – how could the nuns get saddled with such a miscreant felon! How could such a man be in the holy priesthood of Christ, if there is any truth to the charges! Perhaps another fruit of Vatican II. This sordid tale of the arrest on these grounds is indubitably true, as my wife and I confirmed in the Quito newspapers soon after you brought it to our attention.

    We can only lament for the poor Sisters.

    Finally, I had to chuckle today at the broadside attack upon you for raising these and other interesting questions. I was surprised to see the attack's provenance – the very SSPX just returned from pilgrimage.

    Vox Catholica is a thinly veiled SSPX propaganda organ; and an SSPX priest, one Fr. B. Haenny who doesn't reveal himself as such in his heated letter to you. (That he was ordained by the SSPX in 2016 took about a ten-second internet search.)

    I also note the error of fact in the good Father's letter to you, accusing you of a falsehood regarding the Franciscans carrying the statue: That this happened, you do not deny, as Dr. Guimarães clearly states that the Franciscans ultimately carried the Statue down to the Church. What Fr. Haenny skips, however, is the point at issue: whether in fact the SSPX priests tried but could not lift the Lady.

    Another crucial and related point, Fr. Haenny also ignores. Videlicet (Namely), whether the old guard of good Quito men was evicted from their traditional duty of carrying the Statue on the Procession on the day of the Feast itself, and other sundry traditional honors affiliated with the Feast.

    What a scandal, if so! Could this not be rankest colonialism? – he who has the money calls the tune, aye? Apparently so, that is, if there is any truth to the rumor that these privileges curiously extended to the SSPX alone came for a quid pro quo. If not, how did the SSPX privileges come about? Is one among several perfectly fair questions that Dr. Guimarães raises.

    I don't think that's how Our Lord did it, by the way – kicking out the poor.

    In other regards, I am rather astonished at the good Father's hot response, and its ad hominem tenor, not to mention his failure to reveal straight up that he is an SSPX priest. Ditto, Vox Catholica – on whose behalf it is clearly false to claim no association with any order.

    I would prefer to characterize the young Father's response as excitable rather than "rabid." That said, I certainly look forward to the return of the Matador to the Ring!

         In Corde Christi,

         C.B.

    P.S. My thanks to you and Miss Bachar for the good service of bringing this simple account to the attention of the SSPX readership, and others. It presents a question of fact, and raises questions of fact, to which all men have a right to know. I, for one, would be most interested to hear the detailed SSPX response.
    "I think that he [Pope Benedict] was pushed... he semi-resigned... he didn't completely resign, he semi-resigned... he made way for another pope to take his place... but he kept, nevertheless, the white habit, he kept various things of the Papacy." - Bishop Williamson

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #48 on: February 20, 2019, 09:04:20 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Those are just quotes from individuals like us on CI, absolutely worthless. We'll have to wait till Guimaraes elaborates further on these two amazing miracles (the statue can change its weight and the her facial expressions.), which I for one do not believe.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #49 on: February 20, 2019, 10:21:22 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • Those are just quotes from individuals like us on CI, absolutely worthless. We'll have to wait till Guimaraes elaborates further on these two amazing miracles (the statue can change its weight and the her facial expressions.), which I for one do not believe.
    Last Tradhican: You doubt Our Lady can change her facial expressions. Let's put your doubt to rest: there were witness and news reports on the Miracle of 1941, in which Our Lady of Good Success (the statue) raised and lowered her eyes. I am including both Part I and Part II below for your reading convenience.
    Last Tradhican, after reading this, do you still doubt that the statue has changed (and continues to change) her countenance? Further, if Our Lady can change the statue's countenance, why can't she also change the statue's weight? 

    The Miracle of ‘41 – Part I 

    Our Lady of Good Success 
    Raises & Lowers Her Eyes
     

    Marian Therese Horvat, Ph.D.
    On July 5, 1941, Peru invaded the borders of Ecuador – the western Province of El Oro and the Andean Province of Loja. Fierce fighting broke out, and Ecuador was facing superior forces and what appeared to be a long and bloody war. By mid-July many lives had been lost and it seemed there would be no immediate end to what today is called the War of ‘41.


    The Conceptionist Church, center, next to the Government Palace in the main square of old Quito
    In a plea to Heaven – since there seemed to be no recourse on earth – the Archbishop of Quito, Carlos María Javier de la Torre, ordered that a Triduum (1) of prayers be said in all the churches of Quito addressing the Blessed Virgin to implore her intercession before God to end the hostilities. 

    On July 24, the Triduum in honor of Our Lady of Good Success started in the Church of the Immaculate Conception in downtown Quito, across from the Government's Palace. The life size miraculous statue of Our Lady of Good Success, which usually sits in the Abbess’ seat in the upper choir, was brought down to reign above the main altar so that the faithful could join the cloistered Conceptionist nuns in asking her intercession. 

    On July 27, as the Triduum was coming to its close, Our Lady of Good Success worked a miracle for the Ecuadorian people, offering a great hope to a distressed population, a hope that was very quickly fulfilled. 

    Our Lady lowers & raises her eyes 

    It was around 9 a.m., various ladies were near the main altar praying to Our Lady when they observed that the Statue of the Virgin of Good Success opened her eyes wide, turned them downward at them with a look of great compassion and, then, raised them upward. This happened several times. Visibly moved by the miraculous event, they remained in prayer, several of them weeping, but they did not tell the others present in the church what they had witnessed.



    Our Lady over the altar in the Conceptionist Church
    At around 10 a.m., Fr. Benjamin Rafael Ayra y Cueva, the Chaplain of the Conceptionist Covent and a canon of theology in Loja, arrived to vest for Mass. Fr. Cueva, who had a deep devotion to Our Lady of Good Success, went first to the altar to recommend himself to the Virgin, before the Mass. As he turned toward her Statue, he witnessed the same miracle. 

    Deeply moved but fearful that he was experiencing some optical illusion, he went to tell the ladies who were praying so fervently in the church what he had witnessed. They confirmed it, telling him that they had seen the same miracle only about an hour earlier. (2) 

    The news rapidly spread through the whole city. One person told another, “A miracle at the Church of the Conception!” “Hurry, Our Lady is moving her eyes at the Conceptionist Church!” 

    In a short time, it seemed that all the inhabitants of Quito, a city known for its piety and devotion to Our Lady, were heading toward the Conceptionist Church with the hope to see for themselves the miracle, as the Statue continued to raise and lower her eyes at intervals throughout the day. 

    Learning of the prodigy, a reporter from the Quito daily El Commercio hurried to the crowded square to interview witnesses of the marvel. He spoke with the distinguished Señora Matilde Chiriboga de Salvador, who told him with great excitement: “I saw the Blessed Virgin open and close her eyes, just as thousands of persons have seen it today.” (3) 



    Many said that the Statue took on a rosy hue, illuminated with a heavenly light
    Señor Hugo Argüello Yépes heard about the miracle from a friend and immediately went to the Conceptionist Church. Breaking through the enormous crowd, he made his way to the foot of the altar. He said he contemplated the Statue for a space of 10 minutes and also witnessed the Statue moving her eyes along with the many others present who filled the church. (4) 

    Many witnesses said that the face of the image would take on a rosy color. Then, her eyelids, which are normally half-closed, would open wider and she would turn her gaze downward on the people. Afterwards, she would raise them to Heaven and, then, lower them to their natural position. Throughout the miracle, the Statue was permeated with a supernatural light, glowing with a heavenly aura. (5) 

    Almost all the persons who came to view the Statue – some believers, others not – saw the miraculous Virgin raise and lower her eyes. There were some few, however, who said that they could not see anything, notwithstanding their religious predisposition, even though all those around them – men, ladies and children – were witnessing the marvel. 

    For example, there was the curious case of two university students, one a devout Catholic youth and the other a socialist, who entered the church out of curiosity over the event that everyone was speaking about. The Catholic saw nothing, while the socialist saw the miracle. Filled with emotion, he fell to his knees, his face bathed in tears. (6) 



    On Our Lady’s Feast day of February 2, the people of Quito fill the Church to honor her
    When the bell tolled for the 7 p.m. evening Mass and final prayers of the Triduum, several thousand of the faithful were milling about in front of the church trying to enter, there to verify for themselves whether the Virgin of Good Success was moving her eyelids. The police was called to keep order and prevent the impatient people from damaging the doors of the Conceptionist church. (7) 

    This marvelous maternal sign of Our Lady's concern for her people continued through the evening and night, only ending at around 3 in the morning of the next day. Thousands of persons witnessed the miracle. 

    Clearly, Our Lady had interceded for the Ecuador people, for on that day, Monday, July 28, it was reported that a ceasefire had been called. The war was over. On July 29, Peru and Ecuador signed the Rio Protocol and the Peruvian forces withdrew from Ecuadorian soil. There was no doubt in the minds of the faithful that this prodigious event was a sign that the Mother of God had heard their prayers and come to their aid in that time of dire distress. 



    1. A Triduum is three days of prayers before some important Feast Days in the Church calendar to honor Our Lord, Our Lady or some Saint. When it is a simple Triduum of petition, like the one ordered by the Archbishop of Quito, it normally begins with liturgy on Thursday and ends with evening prayer on Sunday.
    2. These details come from the first media account of the miracle published one day after its occurrence in the July 28, 1941, edition of El Commercio, the Quito daily newspaper (n. 13.002). The long headline read "The Statue of the Virgin of Good Success moved her eyelids yesterday various times. This was affirmed by numerous persons who witnessed this extraordinary event. Thousands of the faithful enter the church to ascertain the truth of the portentous event." 
    This article along with numerous other media docuмents were collected and published in a work by Fr. Benjamin Rafael Ayora y Cueva, the Convent Chaplain and one of the first witnesses of the miracle. In the first part of the book he made a compilation of the many articles published throughout Ecuador reporting the Miracle of ‘41; these included articles from the following newspapers: El Comercio of Quito, July 28-29 and August 3, 1941, Últimas Noticias, July 28, 1941, El Telégrafo of Guayaquil, July 28, 1941, El Universo of Guayaquil, July 28, 1941, El Debate, July 27-28-29, 1941, La Sociedad, August 3, 1941, La Corona de Maria, n. 505, February of 1943, La Voz Católica de Loja, October 5 & 12, 1941, La Voz Obrera, August 10, 1941, as well as press pamphlets that circulated in the city of Quito. 
    The second part of his work records sermons on the miracle preached by various clergy in the city. 
    The work is titled Nuestra Señora de 'El Buen Suceso' y el Conflicto Internacional con el Peru en 1941 [Our Lady of Good Success of Quito and the International Conflict with Peru in 1941] and was published with ecclesiastical approval (Quito, Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1946) n. IV, pp. 17-19. I thank Mr. Mathieu Charles Gillory, Director of Excelsior Tours, who provided me with a copy of this book.
    3. Ibid.
    4. Ibid.
    5. La Sociedad, n. 193, August 3, 1941, in ibid., n. X, pp. 26-28.
    6. Ibid.
    7. El Universo of Guayaquil, July 28, 1941, in Ibid., pp. 26-27.


    -------------------------



    The Miracle of ‘41 – Part II 

    News Reports & Testimonies of Witnesses 

    Marian Therese Horvat, Ph.D.
    In the last article, we saw that Our Lady of Good Success started to make herself better known in the middle of the 20th century, as she had promised she would, when she worked a miracle witnessed by thousands of Ecuadorians in the Conceptionist Church in Quito.


    Above, Peruvian troopers invade Ecuador; below, its superior air force bombs the borderland 

    Ecuador was engaged in a border war with Peru, the aggressor with a better equipped army. As losses escalated and no truce seemed in sight, Card. Carlos Maria Torres ordered that a Triduum of Masses and prayers should be said before Our Lady in all the churches in Quito. 

    On Sunday, July 27, 1941, the last day of the Triduum, the miraculous statue of Our Lady of Good Success raised and lowered her eyes numerous times. Believers and nonbelievers alike flocked to the church to witness this miracle that signaled the Queen of Heaven's intercession in that bitter war. 

    The miracle continued throughout the day and into the early hours of the next morning. Then, the statue returned to the upper choir, where she sits over the Abbess chair, governing her predilect Convent until the end of the world, another promise she made to Mother Mariana de Jesus Torres in the 16th century. 

    The Ecuadorian people soon felt the effect of her intercession: By Monday afternoon, the daily newspapers were announcing that a ceasefire had been called. A truce was signed on July 29, and the Peruvian forces withdrew from Ecuador's soil. 

    Testimonies of witnesses 

    The facts of this stunning miracle were published in numerous papers throughout Ecuador. These news reports were collected by Fr. Benjamin Rafael Ayora y Cueva, a Doctor of Theology, in a booklet titled Our Lady of Good Success of Quito and the International Conflict with Peru in 1941. In his work, we find moving testimonies of witnesses of the miracle of 1941: (1)



    Thousands witnessed the miracle of Our Lady moving her eyes
    Señor Juan Bautista Jaramillo gave this account: "I was hearing Mass at 10 a.m. in the Conceptionist Church, when I noticed that people were gathering in crowds around the statue of the Virgin of Good Success. At first, I paid no importance to this, but, then, I saw that some were weeping and others fainting and I inquired about the cause. 

    "One lady, pointing toward the statue, said between sobs and tears, 'Don't you see the great miracle the Virgin is working?' Then, I saw the Virgin open her eyes, turn them in the direction of the altar and, then, return them to their former position. It was something supernatural and I will never in my whole life forget it." 

    Another lady asserted that she, together with her husband, saw at the distance of about six feet the miracle. She explained that her husband was a retired military officer and a Freemason and that when he saw the statue's eyes move, he almost fainted because it proved something he had never believed. They were blessed, she affirmed, to be actual witnesses of this great event that had contributed to the conversion of her husband. 

    "Upon returning to our home," she said, "he swore he would do all he could to convert his companions at the Lodge to the Catholic Religion. I asked him to pray with me, and he knelt and prayed with me." 

    Another witness, Señor Rafael Pérez, gave this testimony: "My whole life I have been an unbeliever. I never believed the miracles of the saints and always thought they were the inventions of priests to exploit the religious sentiment of the foolish believing people. But, what I saw on Sunday night at 8:30 p.m. changed me.



    As Our Lady foretold, Masonry took charge in Ecuador, propelling revolutions against Spain & the Church
    "'I was going down Chile Street to the corner of Independence Plaza and saw a huge crowd, which made me think that there was some new patriotic manifestation against the cowardly aggression of the Peruvians. 

    "'I arrived at the corner and saw that the crowd was milling around, trying to enter the Church of the Conception. A lady explained to me that inside the church the Statue of the Virgin of Good Success was working a miracle. In my eagerness to confirm the fact, I managed to get in the church, opening a way with great difficulty and situated myself as close as I could to the statue. There, I experienced a sensational surprise. 

    "'I observed the Virgin turn her eyes to Heaven and, then, lower them several times. It seemed to me it could just be an optical illusion so, rubbing my eyes, I fixed them again on those of the Virgin and the same thing took place again. After calmly observing the statue for one hour, I was convinced of the veracity of this great event and I left, musing that the national and international misfortunes of the time could well have caused the Virgin and God to have mercy on the Ecuadorian people, who at that moment were suffering one of the greatest misfortunes of their history." 

    Another reliable witness, Señora Isabel de Ramírez, affirmed that she also saw the miracle of Blessed Virgin of Good Success. On the night of Sunday, July 27, after hearing the news, she went to the Conceptionist Church with her sister, two of her sister's children and a servant. They entered the church and, after situating themselves very close to the sacred Statue, she experienced a strange sensation.



    Our Lady over the main altar in the Conceptionist Church
    She stated: "A type of mist covered the statue, which gradually faded away and, then, the Blessed Virgin could be seen surrounded by a splendor that one could only call supernatural. Her face was extremely beautiful and bathed in a light never seen before, with her eyes open very wide and her gaze directed toward Heaven in an attitude of supplication. This was something unusual since the Blessed Virgin always has her eyelids half-closed and turned toward the people below." 

    Señora Isabel continued: "After some moments of devout observation, I noted with great astonishment that the pupils of her eyes as well as her eyelids returned to their natural position. This marvel repeated itself several times in intervals of some few minutes. I witnessed it. The same miracle was seen by all my family members who were present." 

    The report concludes: "This grand miracle was confirmed by many honorable matrons of our society, who also viewed it with great admiration and emotion. These ladies include Señoras Elvira Chiriboga de Salvador, Lola Lasso de Uríbe, María Lasso de Eastman Cox, Victoria Pérez de Quiñones, María Luisa Muñoz de Mancheno, Señorita Gangotena Jijón and many others. 

    "Other witnesses include Canons Ayora, Arcos and Andrade as well as a group of guards and military men." (2) 

    General acceptance of the miracle 

    A journal in Ibarra asked Fr. J. E. Vásquez, a Jesuit priest who lived in Quito, to confirm the reports of the miracle. Although he did not view the prodigy himself, the priest told the reporter that it was certainly worthy of belief, given the many credible witnesses of the miracle of Our Lady of Good Success. The interview follows: (3)



    On April 20, 1906, the image of Our Lady of Sorrows worked a miracle in Quito
    Reporter: Living so near the Conceptionist Convent, Your Reverence can certainly testify to the truth of the prodigious manifestation of Our Lady of Good Success at the end of the last July. We would like to know here [in Ibarra] how the priests and other competent persons in the Capital interpreted this celestial phenomenon since not everyone understands and admits it in the same way. 

    Fr. Vásquez: "I did not learn all the facts about it until the following day. Here in the house we heard news of what was taking place in the Conceptionist Church, but none of us could get into the Church when the doors opened that evening because the crowds were too large. The final word on this, as on any miracle or supernatural thing, falls strictly to the Ecclesiastical Authority and to us, according to the official ruling. 

    "But, in the meantime, we can certainly accept the testimony of so many persons of sound mind, good judgment and reliable faith who reported what they saw and persevere in their statements, notwithstanding some few differences in details, as has happened in so many other apparitions, since that of Our Lord Jesus Christ to St. Paul to the one of the Blessed Virgin in Lourdes and, even more recently, the miracle of our Sorrowful Mother at the Jesuit College. 

    "Similar manifestations prove that Mary, the August Mother of God, to whose Son's Sacred Heart our Republic is consecrated, has not abandoned us and that, thanks to her most powerful patronage, we should expect good success in our efforts and enterprises, in all that does not depart from the holy Law of God and the teachings of the Church." 

    In the next and final article we will look at the meaning of the miracle as interpreted in 1941, as well as its significance for our times. 

    To be continued

    Quote
    1. "Prodigioso milagro em Quito - Declaraciones de testigos presenciales del milagroso suceso acontecido en la Igresia de la Concepción de Quito, el domingo 27 de Julio de 1941," La Vox Catolica, Loja, October 12, 1941, in Fr. Benjamin Rafael Ayora y Cueva, Nuestra Señora de 'El Buen Suceso' y el Conflicto Internacional con el Peru en 1941 [Our Lady of Good Success of Quito and the International Conflict with Peru in 1941] and was published with ecclesiastical approval (Quito, Editorial Ecuatoriana, 1946) n. XII, pp. 31-33. 
    2. Ibid.
    3. "Consultas y centellas," La Corona de Maria, n. 505, February of 1943, in ibid., No. XIII, pp. 33-34 



    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #50 on: February 20, 2019, 10:22:25 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here are the links to the articles.

    Part 1: https://www.traditioninaction.org/OLGS/A019olgsMiracle_1.htm
    Part 2: https://www.traditioninaction.org/OLGS/A020olgsMiracle_2.htm

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6293
    • Reputation: +3327/-1937
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #51 on: February 20, 2019, 12:10:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Quote
    Last Tradhican: You doubt Our Lady can change her facial expressions. Let's put your doubt to rest: there were witness and news reports on the Miracle of 1941, in which Our Lady of Good Success (the statue) raised and lowered her eyes.
    The statue is said to have raised and lowered its eyes once in 1941, and look at all that was written. That was almost 80 years ago. Now Guimaraes says that it changed facial expressions and raised and lowered its weight, in a few lines. I'll believe it after years of verification by a multiplicity of investigators like the 1941 eye movement.
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #52 on: February 20, 2019, 12:25:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0




  • "There is surely a scientific explanation to the statue's perceived changes!"
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi


    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #53 on: February 20, 2019, 01:09:18 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • The statue is said to have raised and lowered its eyes once in 1941, and look at all that was written. That was almost 80 years ago. Now Guimaraes says that it changed facial expressions and raised and lowered its weight, in a few lines. I'll believe it after years of verification by a multiplicity of investigators like the 1941 eye movement.
    First your excuse for doubting the article is because you doubt Our Lady can work miracles through the statue. Now you acknowledge that she can work miracles, but you switch your excuse by saying we only know for sure unless there has been copious amounts of docuмentation.
    Suit yourself, sir. You are entitled to your doubts. We will all know the truth about this story in due time.

    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #54 on: February 20, 2019, 01:22:41 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0



  • "There is surely a scientific explanation to the statue's perceived changes!"
    Incredulous, I just want to point out that this SSPX book was published by a Novus Ordo publishing company (http://www.gracewing.co.uk/). Its foreword (written by a Novus Ordo priest, Fr. Paul Haffner) mentions "Saint John Paul II" and "Blessed Paul VI".


    The Novus Ordo foreword situation apparently caused such a scandal that Fr. Robinson had to issue a disclaimer in which he says he "was not provided an opportunity to read the foreword before the publication of his book", which I find very hard to believe. What author does not read the foreword to his book before getting it published, especially when it might contain serious errors (since it was written by a Novus Ordo priest)? At the very least it's extremely irresponsible, at most it's deceitful and duplicitous.


    The disclaimer is here: http://sspx.org/en/news-events/news/sspx-seminary-professor-releases-new-book-realist-guide-religion-and-science-35424

    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2790
    • Reputation: +2894/-513
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #55 on: February 20, 2019, 08:12:18 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0


  • Quote
    Carrisima: You believe a random guy (Cosmas) on a forum’s family members over one of the longest running advocates/writers online for Our Lady of Good Success in the US? What’s your agenda? SSPX defender no matter what the circuмstance?
    Quote
    Cosmas: OKAY, I'll make this as simple as I can, The Society Priests did not attempt to carry The Statue. The Franciscans carried the Statue.
    This thread has now over 3021 views, with 54 replies, and more, probably, queuing up to present long paste and copy screeds in large letters, taking us deeper into the weeds.

    Carrisima, you don’t know me, and I don’t know you. We are both “random guy(s)” on this forum.
    I tend to think, however, that more of the old hands may know me better than they do you, since I’ve been around for a while, and I don’t think you have. When you suggest that I may be a “defender” of SSPX, it should be obvious to those here, who know me and my views, that I am anything but a defender of SSPX.

    We’ve still got a bit of a problem, though, as I see it. After loads of wordy, breathless posts, expressing a plethora of opinions, we still can’t be sure what exactly happened. That “random guy,” Cosmas, whose views from the past I have sometimes found helpful, and whose credibility I have no reason to challenge, declares unequivocally that Society priests did not carry the statue, nor, apparrently, did they even make an “attempt” to do so.

    Mr. Guimaraes, on the other hand, whose credibility and good faith I also have no reason to dispute, offers a totally different take. He writes:

    Quote
    I also heard from well-informed persons that, when the SSPX priests tried to lift the Statue from the choir to bring her down to the Church, the Statue became so heavy that they were unable to do so.
    Both can’t be right. One of these two people has to be misinformed.






    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #56 on: February 20, 2019, 08:37:57 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Both can’t be right. One of these two people has to be misinformed.
    You are right hollingsworth, I'm sure we will see the result of all this very soon. In the meantime I'm going to keep an eye on the website for further updates. 

    Offline Incredulous

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8901
    • Reputation: +8675/-849
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #57 on: February 21, 2019, 12:54:54 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • I don't think Father embraced modernism by his own free will?

    I like to think his strange SSPX French spiritual mentor hypnotized him.
    "Look into my eyes Paul...you are getting sleepy...very sleepy"

    And we pray, one day, he'll snap out of it :pray: but until then, we'll slam him every chance we get!
    "Some preachers will keep silence about the truth, and others will trample it underfoot and deny it. Sanctity of life will be held in derision even by those who outwardly profess it, for in those days Our Lord Jesus Christ will send them not a true Pastor but a destroyer."  St. Francis of Assisi

    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #58 on: February 26, 2019, 09:49:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • TIA just responded!

    https://traditioninaction.org/bev/229bev02_25_2019.htm



    Bird’s Eye View of the News
    Atila Sinke Guimarães
    THE ‘GOOD’ ARCHBISHOP TRAVEZ – After writing an article on the Sadness of the Statute Our Lady of Good Success, describing her visage as I encountered it in Quito, I was furiously attacked by two SSPX representatives. One is the anonymous editor of Vox Catholica, who I suspect is a priest, and the other is Fr. B. Haenny. I gave a brief answer to the latter, postponing my reply. It will start now. 

    The “courageous” anonymous Vox Catholica editor attacked me indirectly in a brutal and disgusting physical threat against Miss Salwa Bachar, who is in charge of the TIA social media and had recommended my article to the readers of that media outlet. Both attacks revealed a total lack of self-control, which made me wonder if that arrogant intemperance is something common among SSPX priests. 

    I dispense myself from refuting each of those accusations, because a very competent reader, who I do not have the pleasure to know personally, spontaneously defended Miss Bachar and me, putting their false indictments to rest. His answers can be read here

    In this article I will expose some background data that may help my reader to understand better what is behind those accusations, the SSPX presence in Quito and more particularly in the Convent of the Immaculate Conception of the contemplative nuns. 

    Both attacks against me have a suspicious twist. I wrote that it was common talk in Quito that the SSPX had paid the debt incurred by Arch. Fausto Travez during Francis' visit in 2015. My aggressors instead of simply saying: “No, SSPX did not pass any money to Travez,” tried to divert the attention of their followers by pretending that to accuse Travez of receiving money would be absurd. That Prelate would be so good and so far above any suspicion that I would be committing a mortal sin by even suggesting that the Quito common talk could be true. 

    It is surprising that I have to prove to traditionalists that a progressivist Prelate can not be a saint… But since it is necessary, let me do so. 

    Travez, pedophilia & ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity 

    When I mentioned that two girls had been sɛҳuąƖly abused by a priest on February 3, I was mistaken. The abuse that triggered the scandal took place on February 2, the same day of the feast of Our Lady of Good Success. This lends more gravity to the fact that the Franciscan priest who committed the abuse was one of the two who say Masses for the nuns. However, there is more. 


    Fr. Nestor Genaro Bustos with his face blurred

    That priest was Fr. Nestor Genaro Bustos, know in Quito only as Fray Bustos. He is a trusted friend of Arch. Travez and is constantly at his Palace, a well-informed university professor told me. Confirming this is the fact that Fr. Bustos was one of the few persons chosen by Travez to offer public Masses for the Feast day of Our Lady of Good Success at the Church of the Immaculate Conception. 

    I was actually present at the church when a man very similar to the one who appears in the photos at right started a Mass at 9:30 a.m. I left the church and returned at 11:30 a.m. and he was still at the altar saying a New Mass with his stentorian voice. I am not sure if he said just one Mass or two. 

    The other New Mass was said by a Bishop, who I believe, by comparing his photo with the Prelate I saw there, is the Auxiliary Bishop Rene Coba. 

    Fr. Bustos left that Mass and went to his parish in Guápulo where he abused a 14-year-old girl by touching her intimate parts and asking her to kiss him; before he tried to lure her with some candy. The parents of the girl were informed and learned that their other daughter, age 10, had also been abused by Bustos. 

    The news spread and the furious parents and a group of neighbors gathered to lynch the priest. He took refuge in the church but was caught by that group who beat him soundly. Good job! The police came after 20 minutes to arrest (and save) the criminal. The man is in jail and a 30-day investigation is in motion. (El Telegrafo, February 6, 2019, in Spanish, in English

    The Franciscan Province condemned the abuse committed by Frey Bustos and promised to collaborate with the civil authorities. The “good” Archbishop Travez, who is also a Franciscan, kept silent. 

    The dramatic blow of this scandal on the same day of Our Lady’s Feast of the Purification, perpetrated by the same priest that said her Mass at the Convent of the Immaculate Conception, seems symbolic to show us how rotten the whole situation of the clergy in Quito is.



    The ‘good’ Arch. Travez with a girl on his lap

    A highly placed diplomat spontaneously told me that it is known everywhere in Quito that the Franciscan Monastery is infected with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. The “good” Travez, however, enlisted those same Franciscans to replace the Ecuadorian lay Catholics who for decades had been helping to transport the Statue of Our Lady from the Convent's upper choir to the church twice a year. 

    Curiously, in one of the sermons at the solemn Mass that the SSPX said in the Conceptionist Church on that same day, the English-speaking priest did not spare eulogies to both the “good” Arch. Travez and those Franciscan Friars… 

    There have been other cases of pedophilia in Ecuador, but it is not rare for the judicial suits to be dismissed by the civil authorities. Very well-informed sources told me that there is an agreement between the Catholic Hierarchy and the government: the recent communist governments – of Rafael Correa and, now, of Lenin Moreno – allegedly have a dossier with a large number of clerical scandals of pedophilia and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity ready to be released. But, according to these sources, they made a deal with the Catholic Hierarchy to hold it back so long as the Bishops and clergy do not attack the communist agenda of the government. And, in fact, the Hierarchy is not attacking it. 

    This would be the reason why there are relatively few cases of clerical pedophilia and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity reported and why the few that are disclosed are often dismissed. 

    Some furious priests of the SSPX could object: “You did not present direct evidence against the ‘good’ Arch. Travez.” 

    I list what I presented:



    With these data in mind, I believe that it is absolutely licit and even normal in political calculations – applying the same Socratic method (1) – to speculate that SSPX helped the progressivist archbishop to pay his debts in order to have access to the Convent of the Immaculate Conception. Nothing seems more probable, given that SSPX had no noticeable presence in Quito and its main characteristic – to say the Traditional Latin Mass – had been forbidden in the Quito Archdiocese for a long time. 

    As we see, the strong suspicions about Archbishop Travez’ morality do not provide any guarantee of virtuous behavior. On the contrary, they induce any impartial observer to raise the possibility I raised. 

    Unfortunately, I am running out of space. I still need to address other points regarding the presence of SSPX in Quito. One of them is the agent it infiltrated into the Convent in order to poison the nuns and expel those good Catholics who used to provide assistance for the Feast day ceremonies. I plan to address this matter shortly. 

    To be continued 




    Offline CestMoiJeanneMarie

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 57
    • Reputation: +56/-58
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Statue of Our Lady of Good Success shows disfavor to SSPX priests?
    « Reply #59 on: February 26, 2019, 09:51:22 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • This was a continuation of their previous article: https://traditioninaction.org/Questions/B999_M116_Sad.html

    Two Proofs of SSPX’s ‘Temperance’



    Vox Catholica’s Attack




    Re: The Sadness of Our Lady in Quito 2019 

    Note from the Editor: Miss Salwa Bachar is in charge of TIA social media. What follows is a report I asked her to write after an irrational attack she suffered from the editor of the blog Vox Catholica, who I am not sure is a priest or not. After her reply, he found it more prudent to not answer her and made his comment and her reply invisible. A.S.G. 

    On Saturday, Feb. 9, TIA’s staff writer Salwa Bachar posted this comment on the channel Vox Catholica’s YouTube Video. It reads: 

    “I believe your viewers will benefit from reading this article that gives more details about what happened in Quito last week: 

    Vox Catholica’s attack 

    Not even 10 minutes later, Vox Catholica’s editor replied to Salwa’s comment. His reply not only included false representations of Mr. Atila’s article (straw man fallacies) and accusations that Salwa was spreading “dirty propaganda from the non-Catholic sect called TFP,” but it was also rife with intimidations and threats of physical violence. The reply was the following: 

    This article is Slanderous, and frankly whoever wrote it is in grave sin. The author falsely accuses the Archbishop of simony (accepting bribes for religious privileges etc.), it totally mischaracterizes the TFP (Tradition Family Property, who has been illegally forcing themselves on the sisters of the convent), and it states that the SSPX moved the statue from the upper choir and that is also a DIRTY LIE. I have video footage of the Franciscan Friars 1) Leading the procession, 2) Carrying our lady down from the upper choir and placing her on the altar, 3) I have video footage of the Archbishop attending the dawn procession on Feb. 2, which is the first time EVER that he has participated in this devotion 4) and the idea that the Society has enough money to go around the world bribing bishops for privileges is a sick lie. How dare you accuse a good bishop of sin! How dare you spread this dirty propaganda from the NON-CATHOLIC SECT known as the TFP

    “+Salwa Bachar, if I wasn't posting this response from my channel's account, I'd be using much stronger language, and if we ever met in real life, believe me, I'd take you behind the convent and share a couple of fist fulls of the truth with you. You need to seriously re-consider where you get your news from, and you need to do some fact checking before you go around accusing Bishops of grave sin. I'll be praying for you.” [emphasis added

    Salwa’s reply 

    After some hours, Salwa Bachar posted this comment in response to Vox Catholica’s threats: 

    “If you are so courageous, why don’t you present your grievances to the author of that article? I believe he stands behind what he affirmed. I am a lady who just advised your viewers to see the other side of the picture. 

    “The unruly fury you showed against me for just suggesting another point of view shows that you believe you are infallible and you punish violently with words and physical threats those who are not on your side. This behavior is what scholars say characterizes the belonging to a sect. The exposition of the truth is normally calm and rational, not what you did, resorting to baseless personal attacks and labels. 

    “The violence of your reaction also confirms suspicion that you are directly linked with SSPX, contrary to your website’s claim that you are 'not affiliated to any Catholic order or diocese.'” 

    To date, Vox Catholica has not responded. 

    For a snapshot of the Vox Catholica page, click here 

    ______________________





    Fr. B. Haenny’s Attack



    Dear Sir, 

    I have read your article on the “Sadness of Our Lady in Quito – 2019.” Having been there myself for the lowering, I can tell you that the SSPX priests did NOT bring down the statue but it was the Franciscans. Perhaps some of the video and pictures I took of the event will be helpful to expose your lie. 

    Accusing the archbishop of simony and accepting a large donation of money based on the “talk of the town” is a calumny and a grave sin. If you have the proof, offer the evidence. If you don’t, retract your lie immediately. What kind of a Catholic man throws baseless and unproven accusations against a prelate of the Church? You talk of Catholic “knighthood” and “honor.” Such is not in the example of Catholic honor and chivalry that your mentor, Dr. Plinio taught you, I am sure, and that TFP so self-righteously claims to uphold. It is the tactic of Freemasons and all those who justify the means by the end. It is the tactic of all those in history who disregard morality, all those who serve as agents of the prince of lies. I can think of no other reason to publish such lies except that getting control of a convent of sisters and control of Our Lady is more important for you or for whoever you work for than honoring Our Lady’s requests and obedience to the hierarchy of the Catholic Church. 

    If you have any decency and honor you will retract this article and publish a full apology immediately and may God have mercy on you if you do not. 

    Fr. B. Haenny 


    ______________________
    [color][size][font][size]


    The Editor responds: 

    Rev. Fr. Haenny, 

    It will be my great pleasure to answer your rabid diatribe when I find some spare time. Unfortunately for me, I have to postpone this pleasure for about 20 days since I am busy with two other ongoing projects. 

    To put some weeks between your message and my answer can give you time to cool your fury and check with your superiors to be sure that your points reflect well their position. It also will allow other like-minded protesters to come forth, so that I may answer all the objections together. 

    I like many aspects of bullfights and I am glad you assumed the role of the bull charging at the red cape in the ring. 

        Cordially, 

        Atila S. Guimarães[/size]
    [/font][/size][/color]