.
Thank you, LourdesFatima for posting the link to the source, for it was not
entirely looking like the words of Fr. Morgan to me. And as John Grace, above,
points out, "certainly Fr Morgan is not the same man since the General Chapter."
To begin with, is this the way any educated person addresses a letter to
someone or something, with "quotation marks" around their name?
"The Recusant"
"The Recusant" presents itself ‘as an unofficial SSPX newsletter, fighting a guerrilla war for the soul of Tradition.’ This ‘guerrilla war’ is now coming out into the open in that a signed ‘Letter of Entreaty’ has appeared on its website which attacks the Society in no uncertain terms. Addressed to ‘Fr Morgan and the Clergy of the British District,’ the open letter, dated 21st May 2013, accuses the Society of having deviated from its essential mission of fidelity to Catholic Tradition and opposition to Modernism due to the betrayal of its liberal leadership!
Perhaps "Fr. Morgan" could use a dictionary to look up the meaning of the
word "entreaty" -- it is not an "attack" at all, but the pronouncement of an
option to face reality, "Fr. Morgan," or, do you persist in your error of denial?
Ignoring the fact that there has not been a false deal with modernist Rome, and in spite of his public withdrawal in Ireland of the questionable April 2012 ‘Doctrinal Declaration,’ the dialectical letter pretends there is no option for us now but to show true leadership and to follow its proponents in seceding from the Society!
The pot calls the kettle 'black' - the dialectical retort says the Letter of
Entreaty is dialectical! You can't make this stuff up! HAHAHAHAHAHA
And who, pray tell, is this
"his" to whom you refer? Another attempt at
being vague? Did you even bother to read the
Letter of Entreaty? -OR,
(which is more likely) are you merely regurgitating that which you have
been required to "swallow?"
Because if you HAD read it, you might then be capable of recognizing the
fact that 'WITHDRAWAL' of an announcement of what one believes - some
FOUR MONTHS LATER (AFD on 4-15 to di Noia secret conversation of 8-28)
does not make any sense to a THINKING person. How does one retract that
which he believes?
If one declares something, surely one declares it in public and not in secret? How can one have 'secret doctrine'? Furthermore, since it is a declaration of doctrine, i.e. Bishop Fellay's “Declaration of what I believe”, it is perfect nonsense for him to say that he has “withdrawn it” - in what meaningful sense can one possibly “withdraw” doctrine? If Bishop Fellay was prepared to believe those things recently, but claims to have “withdrawn” his secret docuмent now that it has come to light, then we can take it that he as good as believes them still today. Since he has been caught betraying the Society, it would be “optimistic” to the point of reckless irresponsibility simply to pretend to ourselves that he is one of us once again. Neither he nor any of his allies can be trusted, and we think that if you are honest with yourselves you must admit that.
In recent months, such as in his last Letter to Friends and Benefactors and his recent conferences in Ireland, Bishop Fellay has clarified that he does not accept the legitimacy of the New Mass nor the errors of Vatican II nor the ‘hermeneutic of continuity’ which pretends to reconcile them with Tradition.
Oh, Exuuuuse mmmeeee! I got it all wrong! How silly of me! Here "he" is,
parading around "his" excuse-generator, saying that "he has clarified" everything
by
saying the EXACT OPPOSITE of what "he"
wrote in an OFFICIAL DOcuмENT
that "he" was ever-so-diligent in HIDING FROM THE WORLD for an ENTIRE
YEAR.
I'm so sorry. How could I be so myopic? Why would I just not be willing to
abandon all common sense and lap-dog swallow the nonsense that this
inveterate liar has most recently dished out?
Gee - if I can answer that one, I'll be sure to get right back to you.
Hint: "Don't hold your breath!"
With regard to the ‘Letter of Entreaty,’ Bishop Fellay has stated that "the paragraph which claims to prove everything, that is of 'my April (2012) declaration,' is wrong and false from the beginning to end; there is not one phrase which presents correctly what I have written…Poor people who are so misled by their mistrust." Hence, rather than boycotting the Superior General’s forthcoming visit, I would urge the concerned individuals in particular to attend Bishop Fellay’s conferences and to consider carefully what he has to say.
This is the language of a GANG BANGER in Los Angeles. This is not an abjuration
of error. "HE" is not coming clean. "HE" is not acknowledging that "he" was
wrong. "HE" is not admitting to have been in error.
IT'S ALL SOMEONE ELSE'S FAULT. IT'S THE FAULT OF WHAT THEY SAY
ABOUT MY AFD! YEAH. THAT'S THE TICKET!! I DIDN'T DO IT --- THE
LOUSY TYPEWRITER DID IT!
Whilst acknowledging the serious issues surrounding the Society’s negotiations with the Roman authorities, it is excessive and indeed offensive to claim ‘that the SSPX is now a sinking ship’ which is beyond repair.
These are the same guys whose ancestors announced on the Titanic,
"Everyone remain calm! There is no problem! Everything is under control."
Only they left out one important word: DAMAGE. They should have said,
"Everything is under damage control."
Far from abandoning the legacy of Archbishop Lefebvre, we need staunch clergy and faithful to help keep the Society faithful to its providential mission, for the glory of God and the salvation of souls.
Uuuuhh.. no.. what we need is staunch clergy and a Superior General who will
STOP LYING and REPENT, so as to keep the Society directed to its providential
mission, for the glory of God and the salvation of souls.
May the Blessed Virgin Mary, Queen of the Clergy, pray for us!
Saint Pius X, pray for us!
Sancte Pie Decime, Glorioso Patrone
O-ra, o-o-ra pro no-o-bis!Father Paul Morgan
District Superior
Saint Augustine of Canterbury, 28th
http://www.sspx.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=1
Last Updated ( Tuesday, 28 May 2013 11:27 )
Topic: Statement by Fr. Paul Morgan, District Superior, (Read 7981 times)