Agree.  And the True Mass has all 3 elements contained in it.  (1)  It is a liturgical style of Divine origin (the liturgy is a completion of the Jєωιѕн liturgy),  (2) it directly and indirectly communicates the catholic theology (the Mass is the re-enactment of Calvary),  (3)  It is a form of prayer that is consistent with Tradition of thousands of years.

I interpreted your comments about "pragmatic politics" and "producing chaos in the interim" to refer to the confusion that people would have by being forced back into Tradition.  I interpreted your approach as trying to maximize the # of people to accept Tradition.  If that's wrong, i'm sorry.

Interesting perspective on the relationship between these two errors.  Except that Modernism came long before the rampant ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity crisis (at least in a public knowledge sense).  However, I agree with you that the connection between heresy and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a good one, being that almost all the progressive Cardinals/bishops of the Church are freemasons/communists, who have no moral code, and who practice Satanism in secret, therefore their moral boundaries are almost non-existent, since they never entered the Church to serve Christ but to destroy Catholicism.  In other words, Modernists existed since before Pope St Pius X in the early 1900s, as he warned us all then.  Ergo, so did such moral deviancy, because most freemasons/modernists practice such activity, being it is a natural progression of their loss of morality, the closer they come to satan and away from God.  The stranglehold that these deviants have on new-rome is just a function of time, as during the 1960s, the # of good Cardinals outnumbered the bad, except that the evil faction was more organized and able to control the V2 council and its outcome.  Since the 60s, gradually and gradually, more deviants have been appointed by new-rome's popes.