The current tally:
I have adduced arguments from Scripture (i.e., God), Cardinal Siri, and St. Thomas Aquinas explicitly prohibiting women from wearing pants.
A pretty good bunch of authorities, that!
Yet Ekim pertinaciously maintains his stubborn opinion in favor of perversion.
What do you do with a guy like that?
If anyone wants to take the baton and run with it, I am passing it off.
This is a bigger time waster than any other subject.
If you want to know how the SSPX softened, women ruling the homestead, and beating their husbands into submission on topics like this, is a good start in diagnosing the roots of the crisis within the SSPX.
Their priests have preached to no avail.
PS: Anyone want to bet that a disproportionately high percentage of those defending pants-wearing "women" also have TV's in their home?
The common denominator:
A fear of being traditional (aka "weird")
They want to be accepted by all, and this deep seated psychological need is what fuels the accordista.