Read an Interview with Matthew, the owner of CathInfo

Author Topic: SSPXS PINK BRANDING  (Read 11876 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline untitled

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • Reputation: +94/-0
SSPXS PINK BRANDING
« on: May 20, 2014, 10:27:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • From the website presumably designed for an SSPX school in the US, have a look at this picture taken of the bottom of the main page: is that a lady in pink jeans? Or is it an efeminate-looking man (with rings and bracelets - and pink jeans!)..?





    http://school.usa.prod.eu.fsspx.net/en


    http://www.therecusant.com/apps/blog/

    Offline Cantarella

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 7153
    • Reputation: +4319/-556
    • Gender: Female
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #1 on: May 20, 2014, 11:19:20 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This is just very wrong... in so many levels. There is no reason for this picture. A young lady should not be dressed like that sitting on the floor and if this happens to be a male, well...then it is an abomination.
    If anyone says that true and natural water is not necessary for baptism and thus twists into some metaphor the words of our Lord Jesus Christ" Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit" (Jn 3:5) let him be anathema.


    Offline parentsfortruth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3820
    • Reputation: +2658/-2
    • Gender: Female
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #2 on: May 21, 2014, 01:32:21 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's just like the "I'm a Mormon" videos... or the "Catholics, come home" stuff! Do you see the resemblance?

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/b-CuPnhJSbo?feature=player_detailpage[/youtube]

    [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/embed/32hJOeU-1fE?feature=player_detailpage[/youtube]

    Now, if you know about mormons (the -actual- mormons), they don't really fit in. Here's the way they carry on.




    And, I don't think I need to remind you what we look like, but for the sake of argument...



    (Yes, ladies, it's an old picture, but it's not new either)

    The point is, they're trying to "fit in" with the modern world, and so they're trying to make stuff "cool" and "hip" because the SSPX thinks that'll bring in more money.

    Welp, have fun. That failed experiment obviously failed before, but then again, all the enemies of the Church convinced everyone at that time (in the 1960s) that it was a good idea to do that. And if they believe we got not one, not two, and not three, but POSSIBLY 4 saints (lol) and all POPES, then, fine, okay, they can just keep posting girls with pants on their website and see how the strategy works...

    OR...

    They know exactly what they're doing. Self-destruction mode is full on.
    Matthew 5:37

    But let your speech be yea, yea: no, no: and that which is over and above these, is of evil.

    My Avatar is Fr. Hector Bolduc. He was a faithful parish priest in De Pere, WI,

    Offline MaterDominici

    • Owner's Wife
    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 4777
    • Reputation: +3580/-40
    • Gender: Female
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #3 on: May 21, 2014, 01:48:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It does seem she's a "she".



    (The picture is likely a stock photo, of course.)
    "If I could only make the faithful sing the Kyrie, the Gloria, the Credo, the Sanctus and the Agnus Dei ... that would be to me the finest triumph sacred music could have, for it is in really taking part in the liturgy that the faithful will preserve their devotion. I would take the Tantum ...

    Offline holysoulsacademy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 591
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #4 on: May 21, 2014, 07:47:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do not think for one second that they do not purposely choose the photos.
    First the girl in pants, or the boy in pink, and then a close up provocative photo of a young boy with his tongue sticking out.
    In this world full of perversion, and with the recent episodes by pederasts within the church, they have no brains to discern what is an appropriate and inappropriate photo?


    Offline hugeman

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 342
    • Reputation: +669/-0
    • Gender: Male
      • h
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #5 on: May 21, 2014, 08:08:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •    Oh-- you people are such conspiracy theorists! It's just an innocent file photo-- that's all. There's no subliminal indication that we are accepting modernism, or that we've "gone pinko", or that or boys and girls are indistinguishable from each other, or that we let our kids troll that Bad, bad internet! Where do you get such crazy ideas ??
         Don't you see how many Novus Ordo schools are closing? Don't you know how many Opus Dei and Ecclesia Dei parents are looking for good, solid schools?? Can 't you see that if we just tweak our image here a little ( Drum Roll, please ), we'll have our schools filled with Novus Ordinarians
    who will then re-fill our pews and replace all you bigoted, old-fashioned, opinionated, disobedient, "americanist", sede-vacantist mentality people we are trying to shake off!  :laugh1:
       

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3736
    • Reputation: +3625/-1041
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #6 on: May 21, 2014, 08:32:47 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: untitled
    From the website presumably designed for an SSPX school in the US, have a look at this picture taken of the bottom of the main page: is that a lady in pink jeans? Or is it an efeminate-looking man (with rings and bracelets - and pink jeans!)..?





    http://school.usa.prod.eu.fsspx.net/en


    http://www.therecusant.com/apps/blog/



    Either way, it is a problem:

    If it is a lady, why is she wearing jeans?

    If it is a man, why is he effeminately dressed?

    My guess is that the design is the brainchild of the branding company, which being pagan/non-trad, would not be aware that they had made a major blunder in posting that picture.

    I would bet that the matter is coming to the attention of the District about now, and will be corrected.
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 15656
    • Reputation: +8263/-2595
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #7 on: May 21, 2014, 08:41:20 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This was clearly developed from a website template that hasn't been completely scrubbed yet.

    If you look at the bottom of the page near the photo cited by the OP, you'll even see the phrase "lorem ipsum" ... that's pseudo Latin that has become customary to use as filler text in website templates.

    Let's not go nuts here.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorem_ipsum


    Offline JPaul

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3832
    • Reputation: +3712/-282
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #8 on: May 21, 2014, 08:56:43 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The Church continues to crumble while we are busying ourselves with  the SSPX conversion to the world of Jewish advertising.

    Folks, start looking to the source not the symptom.

    Offline PerEvangelicaDicta

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2051
    • Reputation: +1285/-0
    • Gender: Female
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #9 on: May 21, 2014, 09:13:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote
    If you look at the bottom of the page near the photo cited by the OP, you'll even see the phrase "lorem ipsum" ... that's pseudo Latin that has become customary to use as filler text in website templates.


    ^^this.

    and JPaul hit the nail on the head,  In all these matters, we must stay hyper focused on the big picture.  The devil is indeed in the details.

    also, just fyi, you can identify the sex of someone by their index-to-ring-finger ratio.  In this case, the person pictured is female - shorter ring finger.

    (this finger length ratio is one of the compelling components of the argument that Mrs. Presidemt is a male)

    Offline holysoulsacademy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 591
    • Reputation: +0/-0
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #10 on: May 21, 2014, 09:45:51 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • The webpage still has many dead links, so it has yet to be completed, maybe someone will pass them the messages and maybe they will change things IF they are TRULY oblivious to it.

    As for subliminal messages in branding/advertising, of course there is, there always is, otherwise they would take photos from families and plaster them all over like some family photo album.
     
    All media imaging is staged, choreographed and planned.
    And if not, why bother with a branding company?
    Advertising is a school of study unto itself because of the power of multi-media in our society.
    They study the different ways and means to implant THEIR desired message.

    The photo of that child was innocent in the eyes of that child.
    The photos in general are most probably random photos, but filtered down to the ones we now see on their website, chosen from amongst many.

    But placing it side by side with the term Catechism implies instruction, tutelage by a priest (knowingly a man).
    They DID NOT place a picture of a child or children:
    - praying
    - reading
    - studying
    - or even writing.  
    They chose an extreme close-up shot of young boy with his tongue sticking out  (not girls, not boys and girls).
    And they chose to use that picture (the one picture to exemplify a catholic boy) alongside the terminology Catechism?
    You are fooling yourselves!

    Just like the photos put out to the press of the first lesbian "couple" who had their daughter baptized.


    They set the stage with a stark white room, no color, no windows, no trim, no decor. (This sets the stage for a modernist household, no traditional architecture here)
    This is to to focus your attention on three things:

    1) The police uniform -
    On their right hand side (not on the left, not behind them) on a chair they show the police vest of one of the girls, hanging it ever so carefully so the word POLICE is clear and legible.

    2) The painting - crying out to the world of their pride
    On the left hand side a very large modern painting of what is obviously two women (as evidenced by their exposed chest) "making out".

    3) The couple dressed and posed so there is no doubt as to their relationship
     
    Now can you understand what they are saying?
    They are saying they have the law on their side, they are the law, and that their lifestyle is now the law.

    One thing we teach our teens is to discern and understand if any, the propaganda in media.  In fact a common phrase that gets passed around by the teens is -"What's bad about it?" which we then follow with "What's good about it?"

    We also teach them to discern and analyze art - Fra Angelico has very meaningful pieces that the children love to dissect.  
    Teaching the faith through visual representation is also used by the enemy to destroy the faith.


    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 558
    • Reputation: +693/-29
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #11 on: May 21, 2014, 05:43:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't EVER remember reading anything from ABL or the pre Vatican II church condemning pants on woman.  Modesty in dress, yes.  But no official church statement saying that woman must never ware pants.

    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3736
    • Reputation: +3625/-1041
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #12 on: May 21, 2014, 05:58:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Ekim
    I don't EVER remember reading anything from ABL or the pre Vatican II church condemning pants on woman.  Modesty in dress, yes.  But no official church statement saying that woman must never ware pants.


    Here we go again.... :facepalm:
    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-


    Offline SeanJohnson

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3736
    • Reputation: +3625/-1041
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #13 on: May 21, 2014, 06:07:10 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "When we see a woman in trousers [that is, pants], we should think not so much of her as of all mankind, of what it will be when women will have masculinized themselves for good. Nobody stands to gain by helping to bring about a future age of vagueness, ambiguity, imperfection and, in a word, monstrosities." (Notification Concerning Men's Dress Worn by Women, Cardinal Siri, 1960 A.D.)

    Romans 5:20 "But where sin increased, grace abounded all the more."

    -I retract any and all statements I have made that are incongruent with the True Faith, and apologize for ever having made them-


    Offline Ekim

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 558
    • Reputation: +693/-29
    • Gender: Male
    SSPXS PINK BRANDING
    « Reply #14 on: May 21, 2014, 06:08:31 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Well?
    Name one official pre VII document or one ABL document that condemned woman for wearing pants.

     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16