Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => SSPX Resistance News => Topic started by: Last Tradhican on January 15, 2018, 06:56:44 AM
-
The is for the SSPXers who agree with Bishop Fellay's wanting to join the Vatican II church of Bergolio:
Would you attend Fraternity of St. Peter or Institute of Christ the King or Diocese Latin Mass if it was closer to you or had a better priest or better attendance, or a friendlier congregation, or better building and facilities... etc?
-
The is for the SSPXers who agree with Bishop Fellay's wanting to join the Vatican II church of Bergolio:
Would you attend Fraternity of St. Peter or Institute of Christ the King or Diocese Latin Mass if it was closer to you or had a better priest or better attendance, or a friendlier congregation, or better building and facilities... etc?
I know some laity associated with the SSPX who are already attending the Fraternity of St. Peter. They see no difference and the parish of the St. Peter group is much closer, and the people in that parish are much more friendly. As a result, they rarely attend the SSPX.
I predict that the SSPX might lose a lot more of their members if they join the Vatican II church of Bergolio, but perhaps that is what they want.
-
Welcome to the Unified Neo-Trad World
(http://www.institute-christ-king.org/uploads/gallery/2010_ars/pic03.jpg)(https://onepeterfive.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/fssp1.jpg)(http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/content/uploads/2016/04/PA-7506267-800x500.jpg)
ICK FSSP SSPX
newChurch traditional orders that neither Question, Disobey or create Controversy
-
In the area where I live an increasing number of SSPX families are transferring to the FSSP. The old rivalry has started to fade as they are practically becoming indistinguishable.
-
When I attended SSPX chapels it was strongly advised not to attend masses said by the FSSP and other groups approved by Rome because they were compromising the faith . It was almost said as a commandment and not just friendly advice that you could take or leave. You were expected not to attend those masses.
Has the SSPX softened their position on this stance? It seems to me that they would longer be able to advise this if they make an agreement with Rome.
-
When I attended SSPX chapels it was strongly advised not to attend masses said by the FSSP and other groups approved by Rome because they were compromising the faith . It was almost said as a commandment and not just friendly advice that you could take or leave. You were expected not to attend those masses.
Has the SSPX softened their position on this stance? It seems to me that they would longer be able to advise this if they make an agreement with Rome.
I believe it was Bishop Fellay who reported that once the Prelature is created, all of the Indult groups would be under the Prelature, so the FSSP and al the other groups will now be a part of the SSPX and thus now "safe to attend"
-
The is for the SSPXers who agree with Bishop Fellay's wanting to join the Vatican II church of Bergolio:
Would you attend Fraternity of St. Peter or Institute of Christ the King or Diocese Latin Mass if it was closer to you or had a better priest or better attendance, or a friendlier congregation, or better building and facilities... etc?
Another question to ask "If the next Superior General where to admit that the previous SSPX leadership was wrong in trying to make a deal with unconverted Rome, would you then agree with the new Superior General or would you admit he is wrong since you currently admit that a deal is good at this present time?"
-
I know many members of the SSPX who will go to FSSP or diocesan Latin Mass when more convenient and will go to those priests for confession because their "times" are more convenient. SSPX officially accepts the validity of the NO so of course most wouldn't think twice about going with the other options.