Fr Kurtz was assigned to St Mary's Assumption, St Louis and is a fine man and a holy priest. My comment is not intended as a slight to Fr. Zigrang in any way but Fr. Kurtz will be a very welcome addition.
Fr Kurtz is a "company man" because the company is the SSPX.
Any chapel out there would be blessed to have Fr Kurtz.
I can only agree with you to a point. He might have good intentions, he is obviously well-trained (having been trained at an SSPX seminary), and he could be very serious about his priesthood.
But he is at the very least misguided, ignorant, and/or shortsighted about the big picture. He doesn't support the Resistance and that is not a small matter. Remember what the Resistance is. It is nothing more or less than the continuation of the non-Sedevacantist branch of the Traditional movement -- the movement headed by +Lefebvre from the earliest days of the Crisis until his death.
The devil didn't just tempt thousands of priests and faithful to be "discontent" with the SSPX on one fine day. The Resistance certainly has something to resist. The evidence is legion.
So I must disagree with and vocally oppose his sermon of a few months ago, against Fr. Zendejas, as well as any veiled threats he's made to individuals interested in attending Fr. Zendejas' Masses in Houston and San Antonio.
Fr. Zendejas doesn't spend any sermons railing against Bishop Fellay or Fr. Kurtz -- yet he's considered the bad guy. Meanwhile Fr. Kurtz passes over the Gospel of the day to rail against Fr. Zendejas -- and he's the good guy? That's not exactly just or fair.
Topic: SSPX transfers 2015 (Read 42732 times)